In this rejoinder, we discuss the commonalities and differences of the commentaries to our target article. Each commentary agreed with our basic message that intervention science needs to move from the DSM-governed protocols-for-syndrome approach to process-based treatments. Functional analysis has been a guiding principle since the early days of behavior therapy but lost its dominance with the rise of the latent disease model of psychiatry. This model gave rise to disorder-specific treatments with limited benefit to patients and science. We now have the tools and expertise to study human complexity grounded in an understanding of processes of change drawn from and fully applicable to the psychological level of analysis.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BarlowD. H.HayesS. C.NelsonR. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York, NY: Pergamon.
4.
BeltzA. M.WrightA. G. C.SpragueB. N.MolenaarP. C. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447-458. doi:10.1177/1073191116648209
5.
ChamblessD. L.OllendickT. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685
6.
DavisonG. (2019). A return to functional analysis, the search for mechanisms of change, and the nomothetic-idiographic issue in psychosocial interventions. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 51–53. doi:10.1177/2167702618794924
7.
FisherA. J.MedagliaJ. D.JeronimusB. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subject research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, E6106–E6115. doi:10.1073/pnas.1711978115
8.
HayesS. C.HofmannS. G. (2018a). (Eds.) Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
9.
HayesS. C.HofmannS. G. (2018b). A psychological model of the use of psychological intervention science: Seven rules for making a difference. Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice, 25(3), Article e12259. doi:10.1111/cpsp.12259
10.
HayesS. C.HofmannS. G. (2018c). Survival circuits and therapy: From automaticity to the conscious experience of fear and anxiety. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 24, 21–25. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.02.006
11.
HayesS. C.MonestèsJ.-L.WilsonD. S. (2017). Evolutionary principles for applied psychology. In HayesS. C.HofmannS. G. (Eds.), Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 155–171). Oakland, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger.
12.
HayesS. C.SanfordB. (2015). Modern psychotherapy as a multidimensional multilevel evolutionary process. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 16–20. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.009
13.
HofmannS. G. (2011). An introduction to modern CBT: Psychological solutions to mental health problems. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
HofmannS. G.CurtissJ.McNallyM. J. (2016). A complex network perspective on clinical science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 597–605. doi:10.1177/1745691616639283
15.
HofmannS. G.HayesS. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. doi:10.1177/2167702618772296
16.
HollonS. D. (2019). Process trumps protocol: What I liked so much about Hofmann and Hayes. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 54–56. doi:10.1177/2167702618797111
17.
InselT.CuthbertB.CarveyM.HeinssenR.PineD. S.QuinnK.. . . WangP. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
18.
KazdinA. E.BlaseS. L. (2011). Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 21–37.
19.
KlepacR. K.RonanG. F.AndrasikF.ArnoldK. D.BelarC. D.BerryS. L.. . . StraumanT. J. (2012). Guidelines for cognitive behavioral training within doctoral psychology programs in the United States: Report of the inter-organizational task force on cognitive and behavioral psychology doctoral education. Behavior Therapy, 43, 687–697. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.05.002
20.
LeDouxJ. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 155–184. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155
21.
SapolskyR. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. New York, NY: Penguin.
22.
TeachmanB. A. (2019). Commentary on Hofmann and Hayes: The water looks inviting, but how and when do we jump in?Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 57–59. doi:10.1177/2167702618797104
23.
TeetersL.DimidjianS. (2019). The promise of a participatory approach in clinical psychology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 60–62. doi:10.1177/2167702618805082
24.
WilsonD. S.HayesS. C. (Eds.). (2018). Evolution and contextual behavioral science: An integrated framework for understanding, predicting, and influencing human behavior. Oakland, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger.
