Exploratory analyses were used to identify a unique constellation of variables that are associated with marijuana use outcomes among college students. We used recursive partitioning to examine more than 100 putative antecedents of lifetime marijuana user status, past-month marijuana user status, and negative marijuana-related consequences. Participants (N = 8,141) completed measures online across 11 sites in the United States. Norms (descriptive, injunctive, and internalized norms) and marijuana identity best distinguished marijuana users from nonusers (i.e., lifetime/past month), whereas marijuana use frequency, use of protective behavioral strategies, and positive/negative urgency best distinguished the degree to which users reported negative consequences. Our results demonstrate that tree-based modeling is a useful methodological tool in the selection of targets for future clinical research. Additional research is needed to determine if these factors are causal antecedents, rather than consequences or epiphenomena. We hope this large sample study provides the impetus to develop intervention strategies targeting these factors.
BlumensteinB. A. (2005). A comment on the utility of recursive partitioning. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 4254–4255.
2.
BravoA. J.AnthenienA. M.PrinceM. R.PearsonM. R. & Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. (2017). Marijuana protective behavioral strategies as a moderator of the effects of risk/protective factors on marijuana-related outcomes. Addictive Behaviors, 69, 14–21.
3.
BravoA. J.PrinceM. A.PearsonM. R. & Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. (2017). Can I use marijuana safely? An examination of distal antecedents, marijuana protective behavioral strategies, and marijuana outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78, 203–212.
4.
BreimanL.FriedmanJ.StoneC. J.OlshenR. A. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5.
BucknerJ. D. (2013). College cannabis use: The unique roles of social norms, motives, and expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74(5), 720–726.
6.
CaldeiraK. M.ArriaA. M.O’GradyK. E.VincentK. B.WishE. D. (2008). The occurrence of cannabis use disorders and other cannabis-related problems among first-year college students. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 397–411.
7.
ChiuM.AustinP. C.ManuelD. G.TuJ. V. (2010). Comparison of cardiovascular risk profiles among ethnic groups using population health surveys between 1996 and 2007. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(8), E301–E310.
8.
ConnerB. T. (2015). Sensation Seeking Personality Trait Questionnaire. Unpublished scale.
9.
ConnerB. T.HellemannG. S.RitchieT. L.NobleE. P. (2010). Genetic, personality, and environmental predictors of drug use in adolescents. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38(2), 178–190.
10.
CydersM. A.SmithG. T.SpillaneN. S.FischerS.AnnusA. M.PetersonC. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.
11.
DvorakR. D. (2016). Beliefs Regarding Marijuana Scale. Unpublished scale.
12.
FestingerL. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
GalbraithT.ConnerB. T. (2015). Religiosity as a moderator of the relation between sensation seeking and substance use for college-aged individuals. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29, 168–175.
14.
GratzK. L.RoemerL. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.
15.
HasinD. S.SahaT. D.KerridgeB. T.GoldsteinR. B.ChouS. P.ZhangH.. . . HuangB. (2015). Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 1235–1242.
16.
HellemannG.ConnerB. T.AnglinM. D.LongshoreD. (2009). Seeing the trees despite the forest: Applying recursive partitioning to the evaluation of drug treatment retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36, 59–64.
17.
HillJ. C.FritzJ. M. (2011). Psychosocial influences on low back pain, disability, and response to treatment. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 712–721.
18.
JamesG.WittenD.HastieT.TibshiraniR. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning (Vol. 6). New York, NY: Springer.
19.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E.MiechR. A. (2016). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2015: Volume 2, college students and adults ages 19–55. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
20.
KingM. W.ResickP. A. (2014). Data mining in psychological treatment research: A primer on classification and regression trees. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(5), 895–905.
21.
LindgrenK. P.NeighborsC.TeachmanB. A.WiersR. W.WestgateE.GreenwaldA. G. (2013). I drink therefore I am: Validating alcohol-related implicit association tests. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1–13.
22.
MarshallR. J. (2001). The use of classification and regression trees in clinical epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(6), 603–609.
23.
MeehlP. E. (1957). When shall we use our heads instead of the formula?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4(4), 268–273.
24.
MichalskiR. S.CarbonellJ. G.MitchellT. M. (Eds.). (2013). Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
25.
NapperL. E.HummerJ. F.ChithamboT. P.LaBrieJ. W. (2015). Perceived parent and peer marijuana norms: The moderating effect of parental monitoring during college. Prevention Science, 16, 364–373.
26.
OsbergT. M.AtkinsL.BuchholzL.ShirshovaV.SwiantekA.WhitleyJ.. . . OquendoN. (2010). Development and validation of the College Life Alcohol Salience Scale: A measure of beliefs about the role of alcohol in college life. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(1), 1–12.
27.
PearsonM. R.BravoA. J.ConnerB. T. & Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. (2017). Distinguishing subpopulations of marijuana users with latent profile analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 172, 1–8.
28.
PearsonM. R.KholodkovT.GrayM. J. & Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. (2017). Perceived Importance of Marijuana to the College Experience Scale (PIMCES): Initial development and validation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(2), 319–324.
29.
PearsonM. R.KholodkovT.HensonJ. M.ImpettE. A. (2012). Pathways to early coital debut for adolescent girls: A recursive partitioning analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 49(1), 13–26.
30.
PearsonM. R.LieseB. S.DvorakR. D.& Marijuana Outcomes Study Team. (2017). College student marijuana involvement: Perceptions, use, and consequences across 11 college campuses. Addictive Behaviors, 66, 83–89.
31.
PedersenE. R.HummerJ. F.RinkerD. V.TraylorZ. K.NeighborsC. (2016). Measuring protective behavioral strategies for marijuana use among young adults. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77, 441–450.
32.
PerkinsH. W.BerkowitzA. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 961–976.
33.
ShadelW. G.MermelsteinR. (1996). Individual differences in self-concept among smokers attempting to quit: Validation and predictive utility of measures of the smoker self-concept and abstainer self-concept. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 151–156.
34.
SimonsJ.CorreiaC. J.CareyK. B.BorsariB. E. (1998). Validating a five-factor marijuana motives measure: Relations with use, problems, and alcohol motives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 265–273.
35.
SimonsJ. S.DvorakR. D.MerrillJ. E.ReadJ. P. (2012). Dimensions and severity of marijuana consequences: Development and validation of the Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (MACQ). Addictive Behaviors, 37, 613–621.
36.
StroblC.MalleyJ.TutzG. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14, 323–348.
37.
WhitesideS. P.LynamD. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.
38.
WoicikP. A.StewartS. H.PihlR. O.ConrodP. J. (2009). The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale: A scale measuring traits linked to reinforcement-specific substance use profiles. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 1042–1055.
39.
YarkoniT.WestfallJ. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1100–1122.
40.
ZapolskiT. C.CydersM. A.SmithG. T. (2009). Positive urgency predicts illegal drug use and risky sexual behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 348–354.
41.
ZhangH.SingerB. (2013). Recursive partitioning in the health sciences. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
