The present study analyzes whether and how the most common diagnoses within the specific learning disorder (SLD) category are characterized by different intellectual profiles. The issue is relevant to the current debate on the unitary versus decomposable nature of the SLD category and may help define specific interventions. Intellectual profiles were obtained using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–IV (WISC-IV) on 1,049 children diagnosed with SLD using the ICD-10 codes. Four major subsamples were compared: reading disorder, spelling disorder, disorder of arithmetical skills, and mixed disorder of scholastic skills. The four main WISC-IV indexes (verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed) were considered. Results showed that all SLD subgroups share similar weaknesses in working memory and processing speed, but they also showed that the subgroups are characterized by partly different intellectual profiles. These specificities should be considered in the definition of SLD.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BenjaminiY. (2010). Discovering the false discovery rate. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 72, 405–416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00746.x
3.
BishopD. V. M.SnowlingM. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different?Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858
Branum-MartinL.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K. (2013). Classification and identification of reading and math disabilities: The special case of comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 490–499. doi:10.1177/0022219412468767
6.
BullR.EspyK. A.WiebeS. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228. doi:10.1080/87565640801982312
7.
ButterworthB. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia. In CampbellJ. D. (Ed.), The handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 455–469). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.LambertW.HamlettC. (2012). The cognitive and academic profiles of reading and mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 79–95. doi:10.1177/0022219410393012
10.
CornoldiC.GiofrèD.OrsiniA.PezzutiL. (2014). Differences in the intellectual profile of children with intellectual vs. learning disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 2224–2230. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.013
11.
D’AngiulliA.SiegelL. S. (2003). Cognitive functioning as measured by the WISC-R: Do children with learning disabilities have distinctive patterns of performance?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 48–58. doi:10.1177/00222194030360010601
12.
De Clercq-QuaegebeurM.CasalisS.LemaitreM.-P.BourgoisB.GettoM.ValléeL. (2010). Neuropsychological profile on the WISC-IV of French children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 563–574. doi:10.1177/0022219410375000
13.
De WeerdtF.DesoeteA.RoeyersH. (2013). Working memory in children with reading disabilities and/or mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 461–472. doi:10.1177/0022219412455238
14.
EversA.MuñizJ.BartramD.BobenD.EgelandJ.Fernández-HermidaJ. R., . . . UrbánekT. (2012). Testing practices in the 21st century. European Psychologist, 17, 300–319. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000102
15.
FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K.LyonG. R.ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98–108. doi:10.1177/00222194050380020101
16.
GiofrèD.CornoldiC. (2015). The structure of intelligence in children with specific learning disabilities is different as compared to typically development children. Intelligence, 52, 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.07.002
17.
GiofrèD.StoppaE.FerioliP.PezzutiL.CornoldiC. (2016). Forward and backward digit span difficulties in children with specific learning disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 38, 478–486. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1125454
LanderlK.FusseneggerB.MollK.WillburgerE. (2009). Dyslexia and dyscalculia: Two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 309–324. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006
20.
MercerC. D.JordanL.AllsoppD. H.MercerA. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217–232. doi:10.2307/1511208
21.
OrsiniA.PezzutiL.PiconeL. (2012). WISC-IV: Contributo alla taratura Italiana. [WISC-IV Italian edition]. Florence, Italy: Giunti O. S.
22.
PengP.FuchsD. (2016). A meta-analysis of working memory deficits in children with learning difficulties: Is there a difference between verbal domain and numerical domain?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 3–20. doi:10.1177/0022219414521667
23.
PietersS.DesoeteA.RoeyersH.VanderswalmenR.Van WaelveldeH. (2012). Behind mathematical learning disabilities: What about visual perception and motor skills?Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 498–504. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.014
24.
PolettiM. (2016). WISC-IV intellectual profiles in Italian children with specific learning disorder and related impairments in reading, written expression, and mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 320–335. doi:10.1177/0022219414555416
25.
RourkeB. P.FinlaysonM. A. J. (1978). Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 121–133. doi:10.1007/BF00915788
26.
SavageR.LaversN.PillayV. (2007). Working memory and reading difficulties: What we know and what we don’t know about the relationship. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 185–221. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9024-1
27.
SiegelL. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215. doi:10.1037/h0084184
28.
SwansonH. L.JermanO. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249–274. doi:10.3102/00346543076002249
29.
SzucsD.DevineA.SolteszF.NobesA.GabrielF. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49, 2674–88. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007
30.
von KárolyiC.WinnerE.GrayW.ShermanG. F. (2003). Dyslexia linked to talent: Global visual-spatial ability. Brain and Language, 85, 427–431. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00052-X
31.
WechslerD. (2003). WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Association.
32.
WillcuttE. G.PetrillS. A.WuS.BoadaR.DeFriesJ. C.OlsonR. K.PenningtonB. F. (2013). Comorbidity between reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 500–516. doi:0.1177/0022219413477476
33.
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
