Recent theories of stress reactivity posit that, when stressed, individuals tend to seek out opportunities to affiliate with and nurture others to prevent or mitigate the negative effects of stress. However, few studies have tested empirically the role of prosocial behavior in reducing negative emotional responses to stress. The current analyses used daily diary data to investigate whether engaging in prosocial behavior buffered the negative effects of naturally occurring stressors on emotional well-being. Results showed that on a given day, prosocial behavior moderated the effects of stress on positive affect, negative affect, and overall mental health. Findings suggest that affiliative behavior may be an important component of coping with stress and indicate that engaging in prosocial behavior might be an effective strategy for reducing the impact of stress on emotional functioning.
AlmeidaD. M.WethingtonE.KesslerR. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events an interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55.
2.
BolgerN.DeLongisA.KesslerR. C.SchillingE. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808–818.
3.
BrownS. L.NesseR. M.VinokurA. D.SmithD. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320–327.
4.
CarloG.FabesR. A.LaibleD.KupanoffK. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior II: The role of social and contextual influences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 133–147.
5.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
6.
DiamondL. M.FagundesC. P.ButterworthM. R. (2012). Attachment style, vagal tone, and empathy during mother–adolescent interactions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 165–184.
7.
DulinP. L.HillR. D. (2003). Relationships between altruistic activity and positive and negative affect among low-income older adult service providers. Aging and Mental Health, 7, 294–299.
8.
FaravelliC.PallantiS. (1989). Recent life events and panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 622–626.
9.
FirstM. B.SpitzerR. L.GibbonM.WilliamsJ. W. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
10.
FloydK.MikkelsonA. C.TafoyaM. A.FarinelliL.La ValleyA. G.JuddJ.. . . WilsonJ. (2007a). Human affection exchange: XIII. Affectionate communication accelerates neuroendocrine stress recovery. Health Communication, 22, 123–132.
11.
FloydK.MikkelsonA. C.TafoyaM. A.FarinelliL.La ValleyA. G.JuddJ.. . . WilsonJ. (2007b). Human affection exchange: XIV. Relational affection predicts resting heart rate and free cortisol secretion during acute stress. Behavioral Medicine, 32, 151–156.
12.
GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD.Simon-ThomasE. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351–374.
13.
HammenC. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319.
14.
HeinrichsM.DomesG. (2008). Neuropeptides and social behaviour: Effects of oxytocin and vasopressin in humans. Progress in Brain Research, 170, 337–350.
15.
JacobsonL. K.SouthwickS. M.KostenT. R. (2001). Substance use disorders in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1184–1190.
16.
KendlerK. S.HettemaJ. M.ButeraF.GardnerC. O.PrescottC. A. (2003). Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and danger in the prediction of onsets of major depression and generalized anxiety. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 789–796.
17.
KesslerR. C.MageeW. J. (1994). Childhood family violence and adult recurrent depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 13–27.
18.
KrauseN. (2006). Exploring the stress-buffering effects of church-based and secular social support on self-rated health in late life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, S35–S43.
19.
LeporeS. J.EvansG. W.SchneiderM. L. (1991). Dynamic role of social support in the link between chronic stress and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 899–909.
20.
McGinleyM.CarloG.CrockettL. J.RaffaelliM.Torres StoneR. A.IturbideM. I. (2009). Stressed and helping: The relations among acculturative stress, gender, and prosocial tendencies in Mexican Americans. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 34–56.
21.
MidlarskyE. (1991). Helping as coping. In ClarkM. S. (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 238–264). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
MorelliS. A.RamesonL. T.LiebermanM. D. (2014). The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 39–47.
23.
MroczekD. K.AlmeidaD. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72, 355–378.
24.
PoulinM. J.BrownS. L.DillardA. J.SmithD. M. (2013). Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1649–1655.
25.
PoulinM. J.BrownS. L.UbelP. A.SmithD. M.JankovicA.LangaK. M. (2010). Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychology and Aging, 25, 108–117.
26.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2003, September). Probing interactions in multiple linear regression, latent curve analysis, and hierarchical linear modeling: Interactive calculation tools for establishing simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance. Available from http://quantpsy.org
27.
PrestonS. D. (2013). The origins of altruism in offspring care. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1305–1341.
28.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. SCongdonR. (2004). HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
30.
ScholzU.KliegelM.LuszczynskaA.KnollN. (2012). Associations between received social support and positive and negative affect: Evidence for age differences from a daily-diary study. European Journal of Ageing, 9, 361–371.
31.
SchwartzC. E.SendorR. M. (1999). Helping others helps oneself: Response shift effects in peer support. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1563–1575.
32.
SinhaR. (2008). Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1141, 105–130.
33.
StellarJ. E.CohenA.OveisC.KeltnerD. (2015). Affective and physiological responses to the suffering of others: Compassion and vagal activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 572–585.
34.
TaylorS. E.KleinL. C.LewisB. P.GruenewaldT. L.GurungR. A.UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.
35.
ThompsonE. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242.
36.
von DawansB.FischbacherU.KirschbaumC.FehrE.HeinrichsM. (2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological Science, 23, 651–660.
37.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
