Interpersonal theories of depression postulate that depressed individuals’ experience of social isolation is attributable, in part, to their tendency to behave in ways that elicit rejection from others. Depression contagion has been implicated as a factor that may account for the rejection of depressed individuals. In the current study, we revisit this hypothesis by using a controlled, but realistically motivated, setting: speed dating. Approximately 2 weeks before the speed-dating event, participants’ depression levels were assessed. During the event, participants had 4-min “dates” with opposite-sex partners. After each date, they responded to items that measured their affect and romantic attraction. At the end of the evening, participants indicated which partners they wanted to see again. Our results did not support depression contagion: After 4 min of interaction with partners with high levels of depressive symptoms, participants did not experience increased negative affect; instead, they experienced reduced positive affect, which led to the rejection of these partners.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
2.
BerriosR.TotterdellP.NivenK. (2015). Why do you make us feel good? Correlates and interpersonal consequences of affective presence in speed-dating. European Journal of Personality, 29, 72–82.
3.
CacioppoJ. T.HughesM. E.WaiteL. J.HawkleyL. C.ThistedR. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 140–151.
4.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.
5.
CoyneJ. C. (1976). Depression and the response of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 186–193.
6.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264.
7.
FerrariA. J.CharlsonF. J.NormanR. E.PattenS. B.FreedmanG.MurrayC. J. L.. . . WhitefordH. A. (2013). Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS Medicine, 10(11), e1001547. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547
8.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.MatthewsJ. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14, 149–166.
9.
GotlibI. H.LeeC. M. (1989). The social functioning of depressed patients: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 223–237.
10.
GurtmanM. B. (1986). Depression and the response of others: Reevaluating the reevaluation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 99–101.
11.
HamesJ. L.HaganC. R.JoinerT. E. (2013). Interpersonal processes in depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 355–377.
12.
HowesM. J.HokansonJ. E.LoewensteinD. A. (1985). Induction of depressive affect after prolonged exposure to a mildly depressed individual. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1110–1113.
13.
JoinerT. E.AlfanoM. S.MetalskyG. I. (1992). When depression breeds contempt: Reassurance seeking, self-esteem, and rejection of depressed college students by their roommates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 165–173.
14.
JoinerT. E.KatzJ. (1999). Contagion of depressive symptoms and mood: Meta-analytic review and explanations from cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal viewpoints. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 149–164.
15.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (2010). Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling. In HoxJ. J.RobertsJ. K. (Eds.), The handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 355–371). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
16.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
17.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J.FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation Analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
18.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
19.
MillerG. F.ToddP. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198.
20.
MarcusD. K.NardoneM. E. (1992). Depression and interpersonal rejection. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 433–449.
21.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
22.
SegrinC. (2000). Social skills deficits associated with depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 379–403.
23.
SegrinC.DillardJ. P. (1992). The interactional theory of depression: A meta-analysis of the research literature. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 43–70.
24.
ShroutP. E.LaneS. P. (2012). Psychometrics. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–320). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
ToddP. M.PenkeL.FasoloB.LentonA. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 15011–15016.
26.
TofighiD.MacKinnonD. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700.
27.
VittenglJ. R.HoltC. S. (2000). Getting acquainted: The relationship of self-disclosure and social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 53–66.
28.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.McIntyreC. W.HamakerS. (1992). Affect, personality, and social activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1011–1025.
29.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
