Recent work suggests that memory representations may guide basic perceptual functions, such as figure-ground perception. In three studies we assessed top-down contributions to figure-ground perception in typical development and in two developmental disorders: Down syndrome (DS) and autism (ASD). We investigated how figure-ground segregation is modulated by high-level cues (i.e., memory representations) and low-level cues (i.e., convexity and surface integration). Study 1 results showed that both high-level and low-level contributions to figure-ground perception are functional by the age of 4 years. In Study 2, individuals with DS exhibited intact figure-ground segregation based on low level cues when compared with mental age–matched participants, but they showed attenuated effects of high-level memory cues on figure-ground assignment. In Study 3, individuals with ASD showed intact effects of both high-level and low-level cues on figure-ground perception, counter to previous suggestions that high-level influences on perception are usually impaired in ASD.
AlinkA.SchwiedrzikC. M.KohlerA.SingerW.MuckliL. (2010). Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 2960–2966. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3730-10.2010
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AndersonJ. S.NielsenJ. A.FergusonM. A.BurbackM. C.CoxE. T.DaiL.. . . KorenbergJ. R. (2013). Abnormal brain synchrony in Down syndrome. NeuroImage, 24, 703–715. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.006
4.
BarenseM. D.NgoJ. K.HungL. H.PetersonM. A. (2012). Interactions of memory and perception in amnesia: The figure–ground perspective. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2680–2691. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr347
5.
BehrmannM.PetersonM. A.SuzukiS.MoscovitchM. (2006). Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: Evidence from integrative agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1169–1184.
BrownJ. H.JohnsonM. H.PatersonS. J.GilmoreR.LonghiE.Karmiloff-SmithA. (2003). Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1037–1046.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Autism information center. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/
9.
CherkasskyV. L.KanaR. K.KellerT. A.JustM. A. (2006). Functional connectivity in a baseline resting-state network in autism. NeuroReport, 17, 1687–1690.
10.
ClarkA. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204.
11.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
12.
CraftE.SchützeH.NieburE.von der HeydtR. (2007). A neural model of figure-ground organization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 4310–4326. doi:10.1152/jn.00203.2007
13.
Di MartinoA.KellyC.GrzadzinskiR.ZuoX. N.MennesM.MairenaM. A.. . . MilhamM. P. (2011). Aberrant striatal functional connectivity in children with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 847–856.
14.
EdginJ. O. (2013). Cognition in Down syndrome: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 307–317. doi:10.1002/wcs.1221
15.
EdginJ. O.PenningtonB. F. (2005). Spatial cognition in autism spectrum disorders: Superior, impaired, or just intact?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 729–745.
16.
EdginJ. O.SpanòG.KawaK.NadelL. (2014). Remembering things without context: Development matters. Child Development, 85, 1491–1502.
17.
FidlerD.HepburnS.RogersS. (2006). Early learning and adaptive behaviour in toddlers with Down syndrome: Evidence for an emerging behavioural phenotype?Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 9(3), 37–44.
18.
GerbinoW.SalmasoD. (1987). The effect of amodal completion on visual matching. Acta Psychologica, 65, 25–46.
19.
GolaraiG.GhahremaniD. G.Whitfield-GabrieliS.ReissA.EberhardtJ. L.GabrieliJ. D.Grill-SpectorK. (2007). Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 512–522.
20.
GoldreichD.PetersonM. A. (2012). A Bayesian observer replicates convexity context effects in figure-ground perception. Seeing and Perceiving, 25, 365–395.
21.
GrafP. (1990). Life-span changes in implicit and explicit memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 353–358.
22.
GrahamK. S.BarenseM. D.LeeA. C. (2010). Going beyond LTM in the MTL: A synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception. Neuropsychologia, 48, 831–853.
23.
Grill-SpectorK.KanwisherN. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16, 152–160.
24.
HadjikhaniN.JosephR. M.SnyderJ.ChabrisC. F.ClarkJ.SteeleS.. . . Tager-FlusbergH. (2004). Activation of the fusiform gyrus when individuals with autism spectrum disorder view faces. NeuroImage, 22, 1141–1150.
25.
JohnsonS. P. (2001). Visual development in human infants: Binding features, surfaces, and objects. Visual Cognition, 8, 565–578.
26.
JolicoeurP. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461–478.
27.
JouR. J.JackowskiA. P.PapademetrisX.RajeevanN.StaibL. H.VolkmarF. R. (2011). Diffusion tensor imaging in autism spectrum disorders: Preliminary evidence of abnormal neural connectivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 153–162.
28.
JustM. A.CherkasskyV. L.KellerT. A.KanaR. K.MinshewN. J. (2007). Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: Evidence from an FMRI study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 951–961.
29.
JustM. A.CherkasskyV. L.KellerT. A.MinshewN. J. (2004). Cortical activation and synchronization during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: Evidence of underconnectivity. Brain, 127, 1811–1821.
30.
JustM. A.KellerT. A. (2013). A theory of autism based on frontal-posterior underconnectivity. In JustM. A.PelphreyK. A. (Eds.), Development and brain systems in autism (pp. 35–64). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
31.
KanizsaG.GerbinoW. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization. In HenleM. (Ed.), Vision and artifact (pp. 25–32). New York, NY: Springer.
32.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2004). Kaufmann Brief Intelligence Test. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Pearson.
33.
KennedyD. P.CourchesneE. (2008). Functional abnormalities of the default network during self-and other-reflection in autism. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 177–190.
34.
KeownC. L.ShihP.NairA.PetersonN.MulveyM. E.MüllerR. A. (2013). Local functional overconnectivity in posterior brain regions is associated with symptom severity in autism spectrum disorders. Cell Reports, 5, 567–572.
35.
KoshinoH.KanaR. K.KellerT. A.CherkasskyV. L.MinshewN. J.JustM. A. (2008). fMRI investigation of working memory for faces in autism: Visual coding and underconnectivity with frontal areas. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 289–300.
36.
KravitzD. J.SaleemK. S.BakerC. I.UngerleiderL. G.MishkinM. (2013). The ventral visual pathway: An expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 26–49.
37.
LeeA. C.YeungL. K.BarenseM. D. (2012). The hippocampus and visual perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(91). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00091/abstract
MacEvoyS. P.EpsteinR. A. (2011). Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex. Nature, 14, 1323–1329. doi:10.1038/nn.2903
40.
MitchellP.MottronL.SoulièresI.RoparD. (2010). Susceptibility to the Shepard illusion in participants with autism: Reduced top-down influences within perception?Autism Research, 3, 113–119.
41.
MonkC. S.PeltierS. J.WigginsJ. L.WengS. J.CarrascoM.RisiS.LordC. (2009). Abnormalities of intrinsic functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders. NeuroImage, 47, 764–772.
42.
MosseE. K.JarroldC. (2011). Evidence for preserved novel word learning in Down syndrome suggests multiple routes to vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1137–1152.
43.
MottronL.DawsonM.SoulièresI.HubertB.BurackJ. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 27–43.
44.
MüllerC. M.NussbeckS. (2008). Do children with autism spectrum disorders prefer to match pictures based on their physical details or their meaning?Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 1, 140–155.
45.
MurrayE. A.BusseyT. J. (1999). Perceptual–mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 142–151.
46.
MurrayE. A.BusseyT. J.SaksidaL. M. (2007). Visual perception and memory: A new view of medial temporal lobe function in primates and rodents. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 99–122. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113046
47.
MurrayS. O.KerstenD.OlshausenB. A.SchraterP.WoodsD. L. (2002). Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 15164–15169.
48.
NadelL.PetersonM. A. (2013). The hippocampus: Part of an interactive posterior representational system spanning perceptual and memorial systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1242–1254. doi:10.1037/a0033690
49.
NakayamaK.ShimojoS.SilvermanG. H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception, 18, 55–68.
50.
NavonD. (2011). The effect of recognizability on figure–ground processing: Does it affect parsing or only figure selection?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 608–624. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.516834
51.
NeedhamA.BaillargeonR. (1997). Object segregation in 8–month-old infants. Cognition, 62, 121–149.
52.
NoonanS. K.HaistF.MüllerR. A. (2009). Aberrant functional connectivity in autism: Evidence from low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations. Brain research, 1262, 48–63.
53.
PanichelloM. F.CheungO. S.BarM. (2012). Predictive feedback and conscious visual experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 620.
54.
PasupathyA.ConnorC. E. (1999). Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 2490–2502.
55.
PellicanoE.BurrD. (2012). When the world becomes too real: A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 504–510.
56.
PenningtonB. F.MoonJ.EdginJ.StedronJ.NadelL. (2003). The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: Evidence for hippocampal dysfunction. Child Development, 74, 75–93.
57.
PerezL. A.PeynircioğluZ. F.BlaxtonT. A. (1998). Developmental differences in implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 167–185.
58.
PerrettD. L.OramM. W.AshbridgeE. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67, 111–145.
59.
PetersonM. A. (1994). Object recognition processes can and do operate before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 105–111.
60.
PetersonM. A. (2003). Overlapping partial configurations in object memory: An alternative solution to classic problems in perception and recognition. In PetersonM. A.RhodesG. (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 269–294). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
PetersonM. A. (2012). Plasticity, competition, and task effects in object perception. In WolfeJ.RobertsonL. (Eds.), From perception to consciousness (pp. 253–262). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
PetersonM. A.CacciamaniL.BarenseM. D.ScalfP. E. (2012). The perirhinal cortex modulates V2 activity in response to the agreement between part familiarity and configuration familiarity. Hippocampus, 22, 1965–1977.
63.
PetersonM. A.de GelderB.RapcsakS. Z.GerhardsteinP. C.Bachoud-LéviA.-C. (2000). Object memory effects on figure assignment: Conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient. Vision Research, 40, 1549–1567.
64.
PetersonM. A.GerhardsteinP. C.MennemeierM.RapcsakS. Z. (1998). Object-centered attentional biases and object recognition contributions to scene segmentation in left-and right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Psychobiology, 26, 357–370.
65.
PetersonM. A.GibsonB. S. (1994a). Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253–259.
66.
PetersonM. A.GibsonB. S. (1994b). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 551–564.
67.
PetersonM. A.HarveyE. M.WeidenbacherH. J. (1991). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: Which route counts?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1075–1089.
68.
PetersonM. A.LampignanoD. W. (2003). Implicit memory for novel figure-ground displays includes a history of cross-border competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 808–822. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.4.808
69.
PetersonM. A.SalvagioE. (2008). Inhibitory competition in figure-ground perception: Context and convexity. Journal of Vision, 8(16), 4–4. doi:10.1167/8.16.4
70.
PetersonM. A.SkowE. (2008). Inhibitory competition between shape properties in figure-ground perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 251–267. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.251
71.
QuinnP. C.SchynsP. G. (2003). What goes upmaycome down: Perceptual process and knowledge access in the organization of complex visual patterns by young infants. Cognitive Science, 27, 923–935.
72.
RaoR. P.BallardD. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 79–87.
73.
RennerP.KlingerL. G.KlingerM. R. (2000). Implicit and explicit memory in autism: Is autism an amnesic disorder?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 3–14.
74.
RensinkR. A.EnnsJ. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489–2505.
75.
RoparD.MitchellP. (2002). Shape constancy in autism: The role of prior knowledge and perspective cues. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 647–653.
76.
Rovee-CollierC. (1997). Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Review, 104, 467–498.
77.
SanguinettiJ. L.AllenJ. J. B.PetersonM. A. (2014). A repetition paradigm with figure-ground stimuli reveals that both semantic and shape representations can be accessed outside of awareness. Psychological Science, 25, 256–264.
78.
SanguinettiJ. L.TrujilloL. T.SchnyerD. M.AllenJ. J.PetersonM. A. (2014). Increased alpha band activity indexes inhibitory competition across a border during figure assignment. Journal of Vision, 14(10), 49–49.
79.
StokesM. G.AthertonK.PataiE. Z.NobreA. C. (2012). Long-term memory prepares neural activity for perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, E360–E367.
80.
SuddendorfT. (2010). Linking yesterday and tomorrow: Preschoolers’ ability to report temporally displaced events. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 491–498.
81.
SupekarK.UddinL. Q.KhouzamA.PhillipsJ.GaillardW. D.KenworthyL. E.. . . MenonV. (2013). Brain hyperconnectivity in children with autism and its links to social deficits. Cell Reports, 5, 738–747.
82.
TarrM. J.PinkerS. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 233–282.
83.
TrujilloL.AllenJ.SchnyerD.PetersonM. A (2010). Neurophysiological evidence for the influence of past experience on figure–ground perception. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–21.
84.
UddinL. Q. (2015). Idiosyncratic connectivity in autism: developmental and anatomical considerations. Trends in Neurosciences, 38, 261–263. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.03.004
85.
VeceraS. P.FarahM. J. (1997). Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process?Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1280–1296.
86.
WengS. J.WigginsJ. L.PeltierS. J.CarrascoM.RisiS.LordC.MonkC. S. (2010). Alterations of resting state functional connectivity in the default network in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Research, 1313, 202–214.
87.
ZhouH.FriedmanH. S.von der HeydtR. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6594–6611.
