Recent findings suggest biases of emotional attention (BEA) may be expressed dynamically, fluctuating from moment to moment between overengagement and avoidance of emotional stimuli. We attempted to modify these temporal dynamics of BEA to threat among trait-anxious adults (N = 61) using Attention Feedback Awareness and Control Training (A-FACT). A-FACT is a novel intervention methodology that delivers real-time feedback to a person concurrent with her/his dynamic BEA expression. We found that relative to a placebo control condition, A-FACT led to significantly reduced BEA dynamics toward and away from threat, temporal variability in BEA, and emotional reactivity to an anxiogenic stressor. Findings illustrate that BEA may be optimally conceptualized and quantified as a dynamic process in time and that intervention methods sensitive to and capable of targeting BEA process dynamics in real time—as in A-FACT—represent a promising new direction for cognitive bias modification research.
BardeenJ. R.OrcuttH. K. (2011). Attentional control as a moderator of the relationship between posttraumatic stress symptoms and attentional threat bias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 1008–1018.
2.
Bar-HaimY. (2010). Research review: Attention bias modification (ABM): A novel treatment for anxiety disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 859–870.
3.
BeardC.SawyerA. T.HofmannS. G. (2012). Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy, 43, 724–740.
4.
BernsteinA.HadashY.LichtashY.TanayG.ShepherdK.FrescoD. M. (in press). Decentering and related constructs: A critical review and meta-cognitive processes model. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
5.
BernsteinA.ZvielliA. (2014). Attention Feedback Awareness and Control Training (A-FACT): Experimental test of a novel intervention paradigm targeting attentional bias. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 55, 18–26.
6.
BradleyB. P.MoggK.WrightT.FieldM. (2003). Attentional bias in drug dependence: Vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 66–72.
7.
CarretieL. (2014). Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: A review. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 1228–1258. doi:10.3758/s13415–014–0270–2.
8.
CislerJ. M.KosterE. H. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in the anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 203–216.
9.
ClarkeP. J.NotebaertL.MacLeodC. (2014). Absence of evidence or evidence of absence: Reflecting on therapeutic implementations of attentional bias modification. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 8.
10.
DemmeJ. (Director). Silence of the lambs (1991). [Motion Picture] Orion Pictures.
11.
DerakshanN.AnsariT. L.HansardM.ShokerL.EysenckM. W. (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness. An investigation using antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56, 48–55.
12.
EdwardsD.BerryJ. J. (1987). The efficiency of simulation-based multiple comparisons. Biometrics, 43, 913–928.
FieldM.CoxW. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030
15.
HallionL. S.RuscioA. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958.
16.
HeerenA.De RaedtR.KosterE. H.PhilippotP. (2013). The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: Proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 119.
17.
HertelP. T.MathewsA. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 521–536.
18.
HuR. (2003). Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 3527–3541.
19.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Statistical abstract of Israel. Retrieved from www.cbs.gov.il
20.
KronmalR. A. (1993). Spurious correlation and the fallacy of the ratio standard revisited. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 156, 379–392.
21.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
22.
LeyroT. M.ZvolenskyM. J.BernsteinA. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 576–600.
23.
LinetzkyM.Pergamin-HightL.PineD. S.Bar-HaimY. (2015). Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/da.22344
24.
MacLeodC.ClarkeP. J. (2015). The attentional bias modification approach to anxiety intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 58–78.
25.
MacLeodC.MathewsA.TataP. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.
26.
MacLeodC.RutherfordE.CampbellL.EbsworthyG.HolkerL. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107–123.
27.
MassarS. A.MolN. M.KenemansJ. L.BaasJ. M. (2011). Attentional bias in high-and low-anxious individuals: Evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 805–817.
28.
MathewsA.MacLeodC. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.
29.
MikelsJ. A.FredricksonB. L.LarkinG. R.LindbergC. M.MaglioS. J.Reuter-LorenzP. A. (2005). Emotional category data on images from the international affective picture system. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 626–630.
30.
MoggK.McNamaraJ.PowysM.RawlinsonH.SeifferA.BradleyB. P. (2000). Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 375–399.
31.
MogoaşeC.DavidD.KosterE. H. W. (2014). Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70, 1133–1157.
32.
PretzJ. E.TotzK. S.KaufmanS. B. (2010). The effects of mood, cognitive style, and cognitive ability on implicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 215–219.
33.
RottenbergJ.RayR. D.GrossJ. J. (2007). Emotion elicitation using films. In CoanJ. A.AllenJ. J. B. (Eds.), The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 9–28). London, England: Oxford University Press.
34.
SAS Institute. (2008). SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s guide. Cary, NC: Author.
35.
SchmukleS. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19, 595–605.
ShechnerT.BrittonJ. C.Pérez-EdgarK.Bar-HaimY.ErnstM.FoxN. A.. . . PineD. S. (2012). Attention biases, anxiety, and development: Toward or away from threats or rewards?Depression and Anxiety, 29, 282–294.
38.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR.VaggP. R.JacobsG. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
39.
Van BockstaeleB.VerschuereB.TibboelH.De HouwerJ.CrombezG.KosterE. H. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 682–721.
40.
VuilleumierP. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 585.
41.
WaechterS.NelsonA. L.WrightC.HyattA.OakmanJ. (2013). Measuring attentional bias to threat: Reliability of dot probe and eye movement indices. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 313–333.
42.
WaechterS.StolzJ. A. (2015). Trait anxiety, state anxiety, and attentional bias to threat: Assessing the psychometric properties of response time measures. Cognitive Therapy and Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10608-015-9670-z
43.
WiersR. W.GladwinT. E.HofmannW.SaleminkE.RidderinkhofK. R. (2013). Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 192–212.
44.
ZvielliA.BernsteinA.KosterE. H. (2014a). Dynamics of attentional bias to threat in anxious adults: Bias towards and/or away?PLoS ONE, 9, e104025.
45.
ZvielliA.BernsteinA.KosterE. H. W. (2014b). Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clinical Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2167702614551572
46.
ZvolenskyM. J.LeyroT. M.BernsteinA.VujanovicA. A. (2011). Historical perspectives, theory, and measurement of distress tolerance. In ZvolenskyM. J.BernsteinA.VujanovicA. A. (Eds.), Distress tolerance: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Guilford.
