“I Love My Body,but Hers is Better!” Body Positivity and Social Media Among College Women

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how college women interpret and negotiate body positivity messages that appear alongside unattainable body image ideals on social media. The sample consisted of 44 undergraduate college women between the ages of 18 and 23. Methods included semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Using content analysis, the following key themes were identified: a persistent culture of comparison online that reinforced a narrow body ideal alongside an imperative to love your body at any size; skepticism about whether the body positivity movement could create meaningful or enduring cultural change; and the use of fat talk and other self-disparaging online strategies to mitigate critique from others and elicit compliments. Results suggest that women endeavored to internalize the values of body positivity even as they struggled to enact them online. Social media, an ever-changing environment, emerged as a key social and developmental context within which emerging adults negotiate body image ideologies.

Keywords

body positivity body image social media emerging adulthood fat talk qualitative methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agar

MacDonald

(1995). Focus groups and ethnography. Human Organization, 54(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282

Alhabash

(2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544

Ando

Giorgianni

F. E.

Danthinne

E. S.

Rodgers

R. F.

(2021). Beauty ideals, social media, and body positivity: A qualitative investigation of influences on body image among young women in Japan. Body Image, 38(6), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.05.001

Arnett

(2024). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. (3rd ed.) Oxford University Press.

Asurion . (2019). Americans check their phones 96 times a day. Cision PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/americans-check-their-phones-96-times-a-day-300962643.html (21 November 2019).

Baker

Ferszt

Breines

J. G.

(2019). A qualitative study exploring female college students’ Instagram use and body image. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(4), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0420

Banet-Weiser

(2015). “Confidence you can carry!”: Girls in crisis and the market for girls' empowerment organizations. Continuum, 29(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1022938

Banet-Weiser

(2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.

Bernard

H. R.

(2018). Text analysis II: Schema analysis, grounded theory, content analysis and analytic induction. In Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed., pp. 459–490). Rowman & Littlefield.

10.

Burnette

C. B.

Kwitowski

M. A.

Mazzeo

S. E.

(2017). I don’t need people to tell me I’m pretty on social media: A qualitative study of social media and body image in early adolescent girls. Body Image, 23(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.09.001

11.

Butkowski

Dixon

Weeks

(2019). Body surveillance on Instagram: Examining the role of selfie feedback investment in young adult women’s body image concerns. Sex Roles, 81(5-6), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0993-6

12.

Cairns

Johnston

(2015). Choosing health: Embodied neoliberalism, postfeminism, and the “do-diet”. Theory and Society, 44(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9242-y

13.

Capodilupo

C. M.

(2015). One size does not fit all: Using variables other than the thin ideal to understand Black women’s body image. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037649

14.

Cibean

(2022). Adults in the U.S. check their phones 352 times a day on average, 4 times more often than in 2019. Techspot. https://www.techspot.com/news/94828-adults-us-check-their-phones-352-times-day.html

15.

Cohen

Fardouly

Newton-John

Slater

(2019). #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1546–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819826530

16.

Craig

M. L.

(2002). Ain't I a beauty queen? Black women, beauty, and the politics of race. Oxford University Press.

17.

Cwynar-Horta

(2016). The commodification of the body positive movement on Instagram. Stream: Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication, 8(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21810/strm.v8i2.203

18.

Darwin

Miller

(2021). Factions, frames, and postfeminism(s) in the body positive movement. Feminist Media Studies, 21(6), 873–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1736118

19.

Engeln

Loach

Imundo

Zola

(2020). Compared to Facebook, Instagram use causes more appearance comparison and lower body satisfaction in college women. Body Image, 34(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.04.007

20.

Fardouly

Vartanian

L. R.

(2015). Negative comparisons about one’s appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image, 12(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004

21.

Fardouly

Willburger

B. K.

Vartanian

L. R.

(2018). Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectification: Testing mediational pathways. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1380–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817694499

22.

Garcia

R. L.

Bingham

Liu

(2022). The effects of daily Instagram use on state self-objectification, well-being, and mood for young women. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000350

23.

Gill

Orgad

(2017). Confidence culture and the remaking of feminism. New Formations, 91(2), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.3898/newf:91.01.2017

24.

Gill

Scharff

(Eds.), (2013). Introduction. In New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.

25.

Greenhalgh

(2015). Fat-talk nation: The human costs of America’s war on fat. Cornell University Press.

26.

Griffin

M. K.

Bailey

Lopez

K. J.

(2022). #BodyPositive? A critical exploration of the body positive movement within physical cultures taking an intersectionality approach. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.908580

27.

Haferkamp

Eimler

S. C.

Papadakis

A.-M.

Kruck

J. V.

(2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0151

28.

Hennink

M. M.

Kaiser

B. N.

Marconi

V. C.

(2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

29.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

30.

Jackson

Vares

(2015). ‘Perfect skin’, ‘pretty skinny’: Girls' embodied identities and post-feminist popular culture. “pretty skinny”: Girls’ embodied identities and post-feminist popular culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2013.841573

31.

Kitzinger

(1994). The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023

32.

Leahey

T. M.

Crowther

J. H.

(2008). An ecological momentary assessment of comparison target as a moderator of the effects of appearance-focused social comparisons. Body Image, 5(3), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.03.002

33.

Leahey

T. M.

Crowther

J. H.

Ciesla

J. A.

(2011). An ecological momentary assessment of the effects of weight and shape social comparisons on women with eating pathology, high body dissatisfaction, and low body dissatisfaction. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.07.003

34.

Leyrer-Jackson

J. M.

Wilson

A. K.

(2018). The associations between social-media use and academic performance among undergraduate students in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 52(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1307246

35.

Markova

Azocar

(2021). Body ideals of undergraduate women and the proliferation of social media: An exploratory study. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 50(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12412

36.

McClure

S. M.

(2017). Symbolic body capital of an “other” kind: African American females as a bracketed subunit in female body valuation. In Anderson Fye

E. P.

Brewis

(Eds.), Fat planet: Obesity, culture, and symbolic body capital (pp. 97–124). School for Advanced Research Press & University of New Mexico Press.

37.

Mills

Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

(2018). Nature and consequences of positively-intended fat talk in daily life. Body Image, 26(2), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.05.004

38.

Mingoia

Hutchinson

Wilson

Gleaves

(2017). The relationship between social networking site use and the internalization of a thin ideal in females: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(8), 1351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01351

39.

Morgan

D. L.

(1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.

40.

Morse

(2015). Data were saturated. Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587–588. [Editorial].https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699

41.

Nichter

(2000). Fat talk: What girls and their parents say about dieting. Harvard University Press.

42.

Perrin

Atske

(2021). About three-in-ten U.S. adults say they are “almost constantly” online. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/03/26/about-three-in-ten-u-s-adults-say-they-are-almost-constantly-online/

43.

Pew Research Center . (2021). Mobile fact Sheet, April 7, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/#who-owns-cellphones-and-smartphones

44.

Reinecke

Trepte

(2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030

45.

Rodgers

R. F.

Laveway

Zalvino

Cardone

Wang

(2023). # Body Positive: A qualitative exploration of young people’s responses to body positive social media content. Body Image, 47(1), 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.08.005

46.

Salam

(2017). Why “radical body love” is thriving on Instagram. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/09/style/body-positive-instagram.html

47.

Scott

Bay-Cheng

Prince

Nochajski

Collins

(2017). Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults’ social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75(2), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.026

48.

Shannon

Mills

J. S.

(2015). Correlates, causes, and consequences of fat talk: A review. Body Image, 15(5), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.09.003

49.

Sladek

M. R.

Salk

R. H.

Engeln

(2018). Negative body talk measures for Asian, Latina (o), and white women and men: Measurement equivalence and associations with ethnic-racial identity. Body Image, 25(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.02.005

50.

Squarespace . (2022). Squarespace survey reveals Gen Z find digital life more important and memorable than in-person life. https://newsroom.squarespace.com/blog/squarespace-survey-reveals-genz

51.

Stevens

Griffiths

(2020). Body positivity (#BoPo) in everyday life: An ecological momentary assessment study showing potential benefits to individuals’ body image and emotional wellbeing. Body Image, 35(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.09.003

52.

Sturtz Sreetharan

C. L.

Agostini

Brewis

A. A.

Wutich

(2019). Fat talk: A citizen sociolinguistic approach. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 23(3), 262–283.

53.

Taylor

(2016). Schooled on fat: What teens tell us about gender, body Image, and obesity. Routledge.

54.

Taylor

Nichter

(2017). Studying body image and food consumption practices. In Brett

J. A.

Chrzan

(Eds.), Research methods in the anthropology of food and nutrition (pp. 58–69). Berghahn Books.

55.

Taylor

Nichter

(2022). A filtered life: Social media use among college students. Routledge.

56.

Toffoletti

Thorpe

(2018). Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies in “economies of visibility.”. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517726705

57.

Twenge

Martin

G. N.

(2020). Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well-being: Evidence from three large data sets. Journal of Adolescence, 79(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.018

58.

Vannucci

Ohannessian

C. M.

Gagnon

(2019). Use of multiple social media platforms in relation to psychological functioning in emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 7(6), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818782309

59.

Waterloo

S. F.

Baumgartner

S. E.

Peter

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2018). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1813–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707349

60.

Webb

J. B.

Vinoski

E. R.

Bonar

A. S.

Davies

A. E.

Etzel

(2017). Fat is fashionable and fit: A comparative content analysis of fatspiration and health at every size® Instagram images. Body Image, 22(5), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.05.003

61.

Widdows

(2018). Perfect me. Princeton University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB