This qualitative study explores how college women interpret and negotiate body positivity messages that appear alongside unattainable body image ideals on social media. The sample consisted of 44 undergraduate college women between the ages of 18 and 23. Methods included semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Using content analysis, the following key themes were identified: a persistent culture of comparison online that reinforced a narrow body ideal alongside an imperative to love your body at any size; skepticism about whether the body positivity movement could create meaningful or enduring cultural change; and the use of fat talk and other self-disparaging online strategies to mitigate critique from others and elicit compliments. Results suggest that women endeavored to internalize the values of body positivity even as they struggled to enact them online. Social media, an ever-changing environment, emerged as a key social and developmental context within which emerging adults negotiate body image ideologies.
AlhabashS.MaM. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544
3.
AndoK.GiorgianniF. E.DanthinneE. S.RodgersR. F. (2021). Beauty ideals, social media, and body positivity: A qualitative investigation of influences on body image among young women in Japan. Body Image, 38(6), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.05.001
4.
ArnettJ. (2024). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. (3rd ed.) Oxford University Press.
BakerN.FersztG.BreinesJ. G. (2019). A qualitative study exploring female college students’ Instagram use and body image. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(4), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0420
7.
Banet-WeiserS. (2015). “Confidence you can carry!”: Girls in crisis and the market for girls' empowerment organizations. Continuum, 29(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1022938
8.
Banet-WeiserS. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
9.
BernardH. R. (2018). Text analysis II: Schema analysis, grounded theory, content analysis and analytic induction. In Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed., pp. 459–490). Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BurnetteC. B.KwitowskiM. A.MazzeoS. E. (2017). I don’t need people to tell me I’m pretty on social media: A qualitative study of social media and body image in early adolescent girls. Body Image, 23(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.09.001
11.
ButkowskiC.DixonT.WeeksK. (2019). Body surveillance on Instagram: Examining the role of selfie feedback investment in young adult women’s body image concerns. Sex Roles, 81(5-6), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0993-6
12.
CairnsK.JohnstonJ. (2015). Choosing health: Embodied neoliberalism, postfeminism, and the “do-diet”. Theory and Society, 44(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9242-y
13.
CapodilupoC. M. (2015). One size does not fit all: Using variables other than the thin ideal to understand Black women’s body image. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037649
CohenR.FardoulyJ.Newton-JohnT.SlaterA. (2019). #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1546–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819826530
16.
CraigM. L. (2002). Ain't I a beauty queen? Black women, beauty, and the politics of race. Oxford University Press.
17.
Cwynar-HortaJ. (2016). The commodification of the body positive movement on Instagram. Stream: Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication, 8(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21810/strm.v8i2.203
EngelnR.LoachR.ImundoM.ZolaA. (2020). Compared to Facebook, Instagram use causes more appearance comparison and lower body satisfaction in college women. Body Image, 34(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.04.007
20.
FardoulyJ.VartanianL. R. (2015). Negative comparisons about one’s appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image, 12(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004
21.
FardoulyJ.WillburgerB. K.VartanianL. R. (2018). Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectification: Testing mediational pathways. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1380–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817694499
22.
GarciaR. L.BinghamS.LiuS. (2022). The effects of daily Instagram use on state self-objectification, well-being, and mood for young women. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000350
GillR.ScharffC. (Eds.), (2013). Introduction. In New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
GreenhalghS. (2015). Fat-talk nation: The human costs of America’s war on fat. Cornell University Press.
26.
GriffinM. K.BaileyA.LopezK. J. (2022). #BodyPositive? A critical exploration of the body positive movement within physical cultures taking an intersectionality approach. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.908580
27.
HaferkampN.EimlerS. C.PapadakisA.-M.KruckJ. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0151
28.
HenninkM. M.KaiserB. N.MarconiV. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
29.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
30.
JacksonS.VaresT. (2015). ‘Perfect skin’, ‘pretty skinny’: Girls' embodied identities and post-feminist popular culture. “pretty skinny”: Girls’ embodied identities and post-feminist popular culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2013.841573
31.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of Focus Groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
32.
LeaheyT. M.CrowtherJ. H. (2008). An ecological momentary assessment of comparison target as a moderator of the effects of appearance-focused social comparisons. Body Image, 5(3), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.03.002
33.
LeaheyT. M.CrowtherJ. H.CieslaJ. A. (2011). An ecological momentary assessment of the effects of weight and shape social comparisons on women with eating pathology, high body dissatisfaction, and low body dissatisfaction. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.07.003
34.
Leyrer-JacksonJ. M.WilsonA. K. (2018). The associations between social-media use and academic performance among undergraduate students in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 52(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1307246
35.
MarkovaI.AzocarC. (2021). Body ideals of undergraduate women and the proliferation of social media: An exploratory study. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 50(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12412
36.
McClureS. M. (2017). Symbolic body capital of an “other” kind: African American females as a bracketed subunit in female body valuation. In Anderson FyeE. P.BrewisA. (Eds.), Fat planet: Obesity, culture, and symbolic body capital (pp. 97–124). School for Advanced Research Press & University of New Mexico Press.
37.
MillsJ.Fuller-TyszkiewiczM. (2018). Nature and consequences of positively-intended fat talk in daily life. Body Image, 26(2), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.05.004
38.
MingoiaJ.HutchinsonA.WilsonC.GleavesD. (2017). The relationship between social networking site use and the internalization of a thin ideal in females: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(8), 1351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01351
39.
MorganD. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
ReineckeL.TrepteS. (2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030
45.
RodgersR. F.LavewayK.ZalvinoJ.CardoneW.WangL. (2023). # Body Positive: A qualitative exploration of young people’s responses to body positive social media content. Body Image, 47(1), 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.08.005
ScottC.Bay-ChengL.PrinceM.NochajskiT.CollinsL. (2017). Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults’ social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75(2), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.026
SladekM. R.SalkR. H.EngelnR. (2018). Negative body talk measures for Asian, Latina (o), and white women and men: Measurement equivalence and associations with ethnic-racial identity. Body Image, 25(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.02.005
StevensA.GriffithsS. (2020). Body positivity (#BoPo) in everyday life: An ecological momentary assessment study showing potential benefits to individuals’ body image and emotional wellbeing. Body Image, 35(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.09.003
52.
Sturtz SreetharanC. L.AgostiniG.BrewisA. A.WutichA. (2019). Fat talk: A citizen sociolinguistic approach. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 23(3), 262–283.
53.
TaylorN. (2016). Schooled on fat: What teens tell us about gender, body Image, and obesity. Routledge.
54.
TaylorN.NichterM. (2017). Studying body image and food consumption practices. In BrettJ. A.ChrzanJ. (Eds.), Research methods in the anthropology of food and nutrition (pp. 58–69). Berghahn Books.
55.
TaylorN.NichterM. (2022). A filtered life: Social media use among college students. Routledge.
56.
ToffolettiK.ThorpeH. (2018). Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies in “economies of visibility.”. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517726705
57.
TwengeJ.MartinG. N. (2020). Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well-being: Evidence from three large data sets. Journal of Adolescence, 79(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.018
58.
VannucciA.OhannessianC. M.GagnonS. (2019). Use of multiple social media platforms in relation to psychological functioning in emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 7(6), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818782309
59.
WaterlooS. F.BaumgartnerS. E.PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2018). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1813–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707349
60.
WebbJ. B.VinoskiE. R.BonarA. S.DaviesA. E.EtzelL. (2017). Fat is fashionable and fit: A comparative content analysis of fatspiration and health at every size® Instagram images. Body Image, 22(5), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.05.003
61.
WiddowsH. (2018). Perfect me. Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
