This study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Emotion Efficacy Scale – 2 (EES2) among 763 emerging adults. To examine the factor structure of the Turkish version of the EES2, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted. EFA revealed a one-factor solution. After implementing some modifications, CFA of the one-factor structure demonstrated adequate model fit indices and good internal consistencies. Two items were removed from the scale due to a low factor loading and a low item total correlation coefficient. Correlational analyses supported the criterion validity of the Turkish EES2 with relations to emotion regulation difficulties, acceptance and action, and valued action in expected directions. Furthermore, test-retest reliability indicated good reliability of the scale. Overall, the results revealed that the 8-item Turkish EES2 is a promising measurement tool that can be used by researchers and mental health practitioners.
AldaoA.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2010). Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(10), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. The American psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
3.
ArnettJ. J.ŽukauskienėR.SugimuraK. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.28551-304621
4.
AydinY.AydinG. (2017). Değer Verme Ölçeği (DVÖ)’ni Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
5.
BjurebergJ.LjotssonB.TullM. T.HedmanE.SahlinH.LundhL.-G.BjarehedJ.DiLilloD.Messman-MooreT.GumpertC. H.GratzK. L. (2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: The DERS-16. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(2), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
6.
BondF. W.HayesS. C.BaerR. A.CarpenterK. M.GuenoleN.OrcuttH. K.WaltzT.ZettleR. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
7.
CarpenterR. W.TrullT. J. (2013). Components of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder: A review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(1), 335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0335-2
8.
CarverC. S.JohnsonS. L.JoormannJ. (2008). Serotonergic function, two-mode models of self-regulation, and vulnerability to depression: What depression has in common with impulsive aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 912–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013740
9.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272
10.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
11.
GarnefskiN.KraaijV. (2007). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
12.
GratzK. L.RoemerL. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–47.
13.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
14.
JohnO. P.GrossJ. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality, process, individual differences, and life span development|. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1301–1333, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x
15.
KashdanT. B.FarmerA. S. (2014). Differentiating emotions across contexts: Comparing adults with and without social anxiety disorder using random, social interaction, and daily experience sampling. Emotion, 14(3), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035796
16.
KleimanE. M.RiskindJ. H.SchaeferK. E.WeingardenH. (2012). The moderating role of social support on the relationship between impulsivity and suicide risk. Crisis, 33(5), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000136
17.
KnektaE.RunyonC.EddyS. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 18(1), rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
18.
LeBlancS.UzunB.AydemirA. (2021). Structural relationship among mindfulness, reappraisal and life satisfaction: The mediating role of positive affect. Current Psychology, 40(9), 4406–4415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00383-x
19.
LeblancS.UzunB.AydemirA.MohiyeddiniC. (2019). Validation of an emotion regulation training program on mental well-being. Psychological Reports, 123(5), 1518–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119878399
20.
LeblancS.UzunB.PourseiedK.MohiyeddiniC. (2016). Effect of an emotion regulation training program on mental well-being. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 67(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2016.1203585
21.
LeeS.Urban-WojcikE. J.CharlesS. T.AlmeidaD. M. (2022). Rich and balanced experiences of daily emotions are associated with activity diversity across adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 77(4), 710–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab144
22.
LinehanM. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. The Guilford Press.
23.
Lorenzo-SevaU. (2021). Solomon: A method for splitting a sample into equivalent subsamples in factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2665–2677. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01750-y
MarxB. P.SloanD. M. (2002). The role of emotion in the psychological functioning of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Behavior Therapy, 33(4), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(02)80017-X
27.
McCrackenL. M.SpertusI. L.JaneckA. S.SinclairD.WetzelF. T. (1999). Behavioral dimensions of adjustment in persons with chronic pain: Pain-related anxiety and acceptance. Pain, 80(1-2), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00219-X
28.
McKayM.WestA. (2016). Emotion efficacy Therapy: A brief exposure-based treatment for emotion regulation integrating ACT & DBT. New Harbinger Publications.
29.
NunnallyJ. O. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
30.
OrcanF. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Which one to use first?Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323
31.
PedhazurE. J.SchmelkinL. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach (1st ed.). Psychology Press & Routledge.
32.
PeughJ.FeldonD. F. (2020). How well does your structural equation model fit your data?": Is Marcoulides and Yuan's equivalence test the answer?CBE-Life Sciences Education, 19(3), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-01-0016
33.
RichardsJ. M.GrossJ. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one's cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.410
34.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR Online, 8(2), 23–74.
35.
SchulenbergJ. E.ZarrettN. R. (2006). Mental health during emerging adulthood: Continuity and discontinuity in courses, causes, and functions. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 135–172). American Psychological Association.
36.
ShannonM. (2018). Measuring emotion regulation, psychological flexibility and valued living through the emotion efficacy scale: A validation study. Doctoral dissertation, the Wright Institute. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
37.
SmoutM.DaviesM.BurnsN.ChristieA. M. (2014). Development of the valuing questionnaire (VQ). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.001
38.
SternN. D. (2004). The present moment. In psychotherapy and everyday life. W W Norton & Co.
39.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
WestA. (2021). What you feel is not all there is: Free your choices and your life from the default world of the emotional matrix. Enmasse Media.
43.
YavuzF.UlusoyS.IskinM.EsenF. B.BurhanH. S.KaradereM. E.YavuzN. (2016). Turkish version of acceptance and action questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): A reliability and validity analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 26(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20160223124107
44.
Yiğitİ.Guzey YiğitM. (2017). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of difficulties in emotion regulation scale-brief form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38(6), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9712-7
45.
ZimmermannP.IwanskiA. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(238), 182–194.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
