The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a widely used framework for predicting behavior. Considering that technology supported sexual behavior (e.g., sexting) is widespread among emerging adults, it is logical to assume that it is driven by existing social norms, accepted standards of behavior, and the opinions of others, all of which are core constructs of TPB. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine whether intention to sext can be predicted by the constructs of the theory of planned behavior. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted with 314 emerging adults aged 18–29 years who completed a self-report questionnaire online. The modified Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire for the sexting context, which measures attitudes toward sexting, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, and sexting intention, was used. The results of the path analyses mainly confirmed the model proposed by the Theory of planned behavior. Of the three TPB core factors, only subjective norm did not significantly have effect on sexting intention. Our results show that attitude, normative beliefs, and control directly predict sexting intention, and control beliefs indirectly predict sexting intention via perceived behavioral control, partially confirming the sequential relationship proposed by the Theory of planned behavior.
AjzenI. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
3.
AjzenI. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
4.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031930
5.
AnzaniA.Di SarnoM.PrunasA. (2018). Using smartphone apps to find sexual partners: A review of the literature. Sexologies, 27(3), e61–e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2018.05.001
6.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(Pt 4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
7.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
8.
AsareM. (2020). Using the theory of planned behavior to determine the condom use behavior among college students. American Journal of Health Studies, 30(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.47779/ajhs.2015.168
9.
Baete KenyonD.Silverberg KoernerS. (2009). Examining emerging-adults’ and parents’ expectations about autonomy during the transition to college. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(3), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558409333021
10.
BenotschE. G.SnipesD. J.MartinA. M.BullS. S. (2013). Sexting, substance use, and sexual risk behavior in young adults, Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 52(3), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.011
11.
BentlerP. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
12.
BrodieZ. P.WilsonC.ScottG. G. (2019). Sextual intercourse: Considering social-cognitive predictors and subsequent outcomes of sexting behavior in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2367–2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w
13.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
14.
BurénJ.Holmqvist GattarioK.LundeC. (2021). What do peers think about sexting? Adolescents’ views of the norms guiding sexting behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 37(2), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211014837
15.
BurkettM. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0
16.
CastañedaD. M. (2017). Sexting and sexuality in romantic relationships among Latina/o emerging adults. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2017.1298069
17.
ChilisaB.MohiemangI.MpetaK. N.MalingaT.NtshwarangP.KoyabeB. W.HeerenG. A. (2016). Contextualized theory-based predictors of intention to practice monogamy among adolescents in Botswana junior secondary schools: Results of focus group sessions and a cross-sectional study. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 26(6), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2015.1114820
18.
CroftsT.LeeM.McGovernA.MilivojevicS. (2015). Sexting and young people. Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
CurrinJ. M.GoldenB. L.HubachR. D. (2020). Predicting type of sext message sent in adults 25 and older using motivations to sext and relational attachment. Current Psychology, 41(3), 1526–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00680-w
20.
CurrinJ. M.HubachR. D.SandersC.HammerT. R. (2017). Sexting leads to “risky” sex? An analysis of sexting behaviors in a nonuniversity-based, older adult population. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(7), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1246390
21.
DavidsonK. G. (2020). Love on the telephone: Sexting and intimacy in committed couple relationships. Intuitio: The BYU Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 5.
DodajA.SesarK.NovakT. (2022). A cross-cultural examination of the sexting motives and attitudes: Bosnia and Herzegovina vs. Croatia. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7606949
24.
DöringN.KrämerN.MikhailovaV.BrandM.KrügerT. H. C.VoweG. (2021). Sexual interaction in digital contexts and its implications for sexual health: A conceptual analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 769732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769732
25.
DrouinM.LandgraffC. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015
26.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (2004). Attachment and sexuality in close relationships. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 183–201). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
27.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
28.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis Group.
29.
FisherW. A.FisherJ. D. (1992). Understanding and promoting aids preventive behaviour: A conceptual model and educational tools. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1(3), 99–106.
30.
Gewirtz-MeydanA.WalshW.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2018). The complex experience of child pornography survivors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80(1), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.031
31.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. D.BiddleS. J. H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.24.1.3
32.
HouckC. D.BarkerD.RizzoC.HancockE.NortonA.BrownL. K. (2014). Sexting and sexual behavior in at-risk adolescents. Pediatrics, 133(2), e276–e282. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1157
33.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
34.
HudsonH. K.FetroJ. V. (2015). Sextual activity: Predictors of sexting behaviors and intentions to sext among selected undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(1), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.048
35.
IsraelashviliM.KimT.BukobzaG. (2012). Adolescents’ over-use of the cyber world – Internet addiction or identity exploration?Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.015
36.
KaestleC. E.HalpernC. T. (2007). What’s love got to do with it? Sexual behaviors of opposite-sex couples through emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1363/3913407
37.
KellyL.Miller-OttA. E.DuranR. L. (2017). Sports scores and intimate moments: An expectancy violations theory approach to partner cell phone behaviors in adult romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 81(5), 619–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1299206
38.
KlettkeB.HallfordD. J.MellorD. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007
39.
LeeM.CroftsT.McGovernA.MilivojevicS. (2015). Sexting among young people: Perceptions and practices.
40.
LeeC. H.MoakS.WalkerJ. T. (2016). Effects of self-control, social control, and social learning on sexting behavior among South Korean youths. Youth & Society, 48(2), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X13490762
41.
LenhartA. (2009). Teens and mobile phones over the past five years: Pew internet looks back (pp. 1–17). Pew Internet and American Life Project.
42.
LimM. S. C.VellaA. M.HoryniakD. R.HellardM. E. (2016). Exploring attitudes towards sexting of young people: A cross sectional study. Sexual Health, 13(6), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16029
43.
LiongM.ChengG. H.-L. (2017). Sext and gender: Examining gender effects on sexting based on the theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(7), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1276965
44.
LippmanJ. R.CampbellS. W. (2012, May 24–28).Teenagers and sexting: Perceived norms and sexual double standard. [Paper presentation]. ICA conference 2012, Phoenix, AZ.
45.
LippmanJ. R.CampbellS. W. (2014) Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…If you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009
46.
MaddenM.LenhartA.CortesiS.GasserR.DugganM.SmithA.BeatonM. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Research Center.
47.
MaheuxA. J.EvansR.WidmanL.NesiJ.PrinsteinM. J.Choukas-BradleyS. (2020). Popular peer norms and adolescent sexting behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 78(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.002
48.
MoriC.CookeJ. E.TempleJ. R.LyA.LuY.AndersonN.RashC.MadiganS. (2020). The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
49.
NurmalaI.AhiyanasariC. E.WulandariA.PertiwiE. D. (2019). Premarital sex behavior among adolescent: The influence of subjective norms and perceived behavioral control toward attitudes of high school student. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15(3), 110–116.
50.
ParkS.OhS. (2023). The relationships of perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and subjective norms with COVID-19 preventive behaviors: A secondary data analysis comparing adolescents and emerging adults in South Korea. Child Health Nursing Research, 29(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2023.29.2.149
51.
ParkerT. S.BlackburnK. M.PerryM. S.HawksJ. M. (2013). Sexting as an intervention: Relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.635134
52.
PotardC.CballeroE.CourtoisR. (2017). Determinants of condom use among young adults: The role of preparatory behavioral strategies in the theory of planned behavior. Behavioral Psychology, 25(1), 111–128.
53.
PrinsteinM. J.MeadeC. S.CohenG. L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsg012
54.
RenfrowD. G.RolloE. A. (2014). Sexting on campus: Minimizing perceived risks and neutralizing behaviors. Deviant Behavior, 35(11), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.897122
55.
RingroseJ.GillR.LivingstoneS.HarveyL. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’: A report prepared for the NSPCC. National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.
56.
RingroseJ.HarveyL.GillR.LivingstoneS. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853
57.
Sompolska-RzechułaA.Kurdyś-KujawskaA. (2022). Generation of young adults living with their parents in European Union countries. Sustainability, 14(7), 4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074272
58.
SpenoA. G.AubreyJ. S. (2018). Adolescent Sexting: The roles of self-objectification and internalization of media ideals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318809383
59.
SpringstonK. M. (2017). Gender Differences in participation in and motivations for sexting: The effects of gender role attitudes, masculinity, and femininity. Butler Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3(1), 9.
60.
TsengY. H.ChengC. P.KuoS. H.HouW. L.ChanT. F.ChouF. H. (2020). Safe sexual behaviors intention among female youth: The construction on extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(3), 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14277
61.
Van OuytselJ.Punyanunt-CarterN. M.WalraveM.PonnetK. (2020). Sexting within young adults’ dating and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.007
62.
Van OuytselJ.Van GoolE.WalraveM.PonnetK.PeetersE. (2016). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
63.
VasilenkoS. A.LefkowitzE. S. (2018). Sexual behavior and daily affect in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 6(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818767503
64.
WalkerS.SanciL.Temple-SmithM. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 52(6), 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.026
65.
WalraveM.HeirmanW.HallamL. (2013). Under pressure to sext? Applying the theory of planned behaviour to adolescent sexting. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2013.837099
66.
WalraveM.PonnetK.Van OuytselJ.Van GoolE.HeirmanW.VerbeekA. (2015). Whether or not to engage in sexting: Explaining adolescent sexting behaviour by applying the prototype willingness model. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.008
WilsonC.van SteenT.AkinyodeC.BrodieZ. P.ScottG. G. (2021). To sext or not to sext. The role of social-cognitive processes in the decision to engage in sexting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(4), 1410–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521995884
69.
WysockiD. K.ChildersC. D. (2011). Let my fingers do the talking”: Sexting and infidelity in cyberspace. Sexuality & Culture, 15(3), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
