We experimentally investigated the influence of sexual orientation, gender, relationship type, and partner gender on emerging adults’ gender-typed conflict management strategies. Our 2 Participant Gender (between-subjects) x 2 Sexual Orientation (between-subjects) x 3 Relationship Context (within-subjects) mixed factorial design addressed whether findings of prior research (Keener & Strough, 2017) with heterosexual emerging adults generalized to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer/Questioning (LGBQ) men and women. Participants (N = 227; LBQ women = 49; GBQ men = 33; heterosexual women = 70; heterosexual men = 75) were emerging adults from the United States. They read hypothetical conflict scenarios and rated their likelihood of using communal/other-focused or agentic/self-focused strategies. Endorsement of agentic strategies varied depending on sexual orientation, participant gender, and relationship type. However, endorsement of communal strategies only varied by participant gender and relationship type. Our findings support social contextual developmental approaches emphasizing that individual and contextual factors interact to influence gender-typed behavior.
Abu-HilalM. M.AldhafriS.Al-BahraniM.KamaliM. (2016). The Arab culture and the Arab self: Emphasis on gender. In KingR.BernardoA. (Eds.), The psychology of Asian learners (pp. 125–138). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_8
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2016). College students as emerging adults: The developmental implications of the college context. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 219–222.
4.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
BaltesP. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611
7.
BemS. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
8.
BishopM. D.FishJ. N.HammackP. L.RussellS. T. (2020). Sexual identity development milestones in three generations of sexual minority people: A national probability sample. Developmental Psychology, 56(11), 2177–2193. https://doi-org.proxy-sru.klnpa.org/10.1037/dev0001105
9.
BorowskiS. K.RoseA. J. (2021). Boys’ and girls’ interactions with same-gender friends and other-gender friends: A focus on problem disclosures. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12681
10.
BrovermanI. K.BrovermanD. M.ClarksonF. E.RosenkrantzP. S.VogelS. R. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34(1), 1–7. http://doi.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/10.1037/h0028797
11.
BuhrmesterD. (1996). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence, and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In BukowskiW. M.NewcombA. F. (Eds), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 158–185). Cambridge University Press.
12.
BukowskiW. M.DeLayD. (2020). Studying the same-gender preference as a defining feature of cultural contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1863.
13.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73
14.
CoatsA. H.HoppmannC.ScottS. B. (2014). Goals, strategies, and well-being across adulthood: Integrating perspectives from the coping and everyday problem-solving literatures. APA.
15.
ConnollyJ.BairdK.BravoV.LovaldB.PeplerD.CraigW. (2015). Adolescents’ use of affiliative and aggressive strategies during conflict with romantic partners and best-friends. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(5), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1066244
16.
DavisG. E.MehtaC. M. (2021). “We are okay to be ourselves”: Understanding gay men’s friendships with heterosexual and gay men. Psychology of men & Masculinities. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1037/men0000381
17.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369
18.
DeLucia-WaackJ. L.GerrityD. A.TaubD. J.BaldoT. D. (2001). Gender, gender role identity, and type of relationship as predictors of relationship behavior and beliefs in college students. Journal of College Counseling, 4(1), 32–48. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2001.tb00181.x
19.
DiamondL. M.DubéE. M. (2002). Friendship and attachment among heterosexual and sexual-minority youths: Does the gender of your friend matter?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(2), 155–166. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014026111486
20.
DiamondL. M.Savin-WilliamsR. C.DubéE. M. (1999). Sex, dating, passionate friendships, and romance: Intimate peer relations among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. In FurmanW.BrownB. B.FeiringC. (Eds), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 175–210). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316182185.009
21.
EldridgeK. A.ChristensenA. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In NollerP.FeeneyJ. A. (Eds.). Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289–322). Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500077.016
22.
EriksonE. H. (1993). Childhood and society. WW Norton & Company. (Original work published1950)
23.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (2004). Attachment and sexuality in close relationships. In NollerP.FeeneyJ. A. (Eds.). Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 193–212). Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500077.016
FurmanW. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 177–180. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00195
26.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5–22. http://doi.org/10.2307/353438
27.
GriffinC. (2002). Girls’ friendships and the formation of sexual identities. In Lesbian and gay psychology: New perspectives. BPS Blackwell.
28.
HolleyS. R.SturmV. E.LevensonR. W. (2010). Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(5), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918361003712145
29.
HsuN.BaduraK. L.NewmanD. A.SpeachM. E. P. (2021). Gender, “masculinity,” and “femininity”: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in agency and communion. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 987–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000343.supp
HydeJ. S.BiglerR. S.JoelD.TateC. C.van AndersS. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307
32.
KaestleC. E. (2019). Sexual orientation trajectories based on sexual attractions, partners, and identity: A longitudinal investigation from adolescence through young adulthood using a US representative sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(7), 811–826. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1577351
33.
KeenerE. (2015). The complexity of gender: It is all that and more... in sum, it is complicated. Sex Roles, 73(11), 481–489. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0542-5
34.
KeenerE.StroughJ. (2017). Having and doing gender: Young adults’ expression of gender when resolving conflicts with friends and romantic partners. Sex Roles, 76(9-10), 615–626. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0644-8
35.
KeenerE.StroughJ.DiDonatoL. (2012). Gender differences and similarities in strategies for managing conflict with friends and romantic partners. Sex Roles, 67(1-2), 83–97. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0131-9
36.
KeenerE.StroughJ.DiDonatoL. (2019). Adolescents’ endorsement of communal and agentic conflict-management strategies with friends and romantic partners. Sex Roles, 80(9), 578–585. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0961-1
37.
KillermannS. (2017). A guide to gender: The social justice advocate's handbook. Impetus Books.
38.
KreagerD. A.StaffJ.GauthierR.LefkowitzE. S.FeinbergM. E. (2016). The double standard at sexual debut: Gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75, 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x
39.
KurdekL. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 553–568. http://doi.org/10.2307/353528
LaursenB.FinkelsteinB. D.Townsend BettsN. (2001). A developmental meta-analysis of peer conflict resolution. Developmental Review, 21(4), 423–449.
42.
LeB. M.ImpettE. A.LemayE. P.JrMuiseA.TskhayK. O. (2018). Communal motivation and well-being in interpersonal relationships: An integrative review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000133
43.
LeaperC. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 65, 67–86. http://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219946507
44.
LeszczynskiJ. P. (2009). A state conceptualization: Are individuals’ masculine and feminine personality traits situationally influenced?Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 157–162. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.014
45.
LeszczynskiJ. P.StroughJ. (2008). The contextual specificity of masculinity and femininity in early adolescence. Social Development, 17(3), 719–736. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00443.x
MaccobyE. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Harvard University Press.
48.
MachinA.DunbarR. (2013). Sex and gender as factors in in romantic partnerships and best friendships. Journal of Relationships Research, Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2013.8
49.
MahalikJ. R.LockeB. D.LudlowL. H.DiemerM. A.ScottR. P.GottfriedM.FreitasG. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3.
50.
MartinA. E.SlepianM. L. (2018). Dehumanizing gender: The debiasing effects of gendering human-abstracted entities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(12), 1681–1696.
51.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.431
52.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A.HanishL.LeonardS.DinellaL. M. (2011). Experienced and expected similarity to same-gender peers: Moving toward a comprehensive model of gender segregation. Sex Roles, 65(5), 421–434. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0029-y
53.
MehtaC. M. (2015a). Gender in context: Considering variability in Wood and Eagly’s traditions of gender identity. Sex Roles, 73(11), 490–496. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0535-4
54.
MehtaC. M. (2015b). “Girls like talking about serious things”: Sex segregation in lesbian emerging adult’s friendships. In Presentation at the annual meeting of the Association of Women in Psychology, San Franscisco, CA, 2015.
55.
MehtaC. M.StroughJ. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29(3), 201–220. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001
56.
MollerL. C.SerbinL. A. (1996). Antecedents of toddler gender segregation: Cognitive consonance, gender-typed toy preferences and behavioral compatibility. Sex Roles, 35(7), 445–460. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544131
57.
NardiP. M.SherrodD. (1994). Friendship in the lives of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(2), 185–199. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407594112002
58.
PickardJ.StroughJ. (2003). The effects of same-sex and other-sex contexts on masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 48(9), 421–432.
59.
ReisH. T. (1998). Gender differences in intimacy and related behaviors: Context and process. In Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 203–232). Psychology Press. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315805870-9
60.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
61.
RoseS. (2000). Heterosexism and the study of women's romantic and friend relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00168
62.
RoseS.ZandD. (2000). Lesbian dating and courtship from young adulthood to midlife. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 11(2-3), 77–104. http://doi.org/10.1300/J041v11n02_04
63.
Savin-WilliamsR. C. (1998). The disclosure to families of same-sex attractions by lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(1), 49–68. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0801_3
64.
Savin-WilliamsR. C.DiamondL. M. (2000). Sexual identity trajectories among sexual-minority Youths: Gender comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002058505138
65.
SchmaderT.BlockK. (2015). Engendering identity: Toward a clearer conceptualization of gender as a social identity. Sex Roles, 73, 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0536-3
StroughJ.KeenerE. J. (2014). Goals and strategies for solving interpersonal everyday problem solving across the life span. In VerhaeghenP.HertzogC. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of emotion, social cognition, and everyday problem solving during adulthood. (pp. 190–205). Oxford University Press.
68.
StroughJ.McFallJ. P.FlinnJ. A.SchullerK. L. (2008). Collaborative everyday problem solving among same-gender friends in early and later adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012830
69.
SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. Norton.
70.
TateC. C.Ben HagaiE.CrosbyF. J. (2020). Undoing the gender binary. Cambridge University Press.
71.
TateC. C.YoussefC. P.BettergarciaJ. N. (2014). Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18(4), 302–312. http://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000019
72.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.GentileB. (2012). Generational increases in agentic self-evaluations among American college students, 1966–2009. Self and Identity, 11(4), 409–427.
73.
van AndersS. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1177–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8
74.
WalczynskiP. T. (1997). Power, personality, and conflictual interaction: An exploration of demand-withdraw interaction in same-sex and cross-sex couples. University of California.
75.
WayN.CressenJ.BodianS.PrestonJ.NelsonJ.HughesD. (2014). “It might be nice to be a girl... Then you wouldn’t have to be emotionless”: Boys' resistance to norms of masculinity during adolescence. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(3), 241. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0037262
ZarbatanyL.McDougallP.HymelS. (2000). Gender-differentiated experience in the peer culture: links to intimacy in preadolescence. Social Development, 9(1), 62–79. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00111
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
