Status among peers likely continues to play a role in social functioning and well-being beyond adolescence. This study examined how emerging adults in tertiary education defined popularity, and their beliefs regarding aggressive and prosocial behaviors affording status. The role of status motivation, own status, and gender in these definitions and beliefs were explored. Emerging adults primarily associated popularity with being central, liked, and respected. Gender prototypical features (attractiveness and likeability for women; power and centrality for men) were associated with high popularity. Compared to adolescence, popularity in emerging adulthood was associated more with likeability and less with attractiveness, power, fitting in, or antisocial behavior. Prosocial behavior, openness, extraversion, and dominance were identified as the most important ways to acquire popularity. The findings indicate that popularity is relevant to emerging adults and offer several directions for future research in order to benefit the social well-being of emerging adults in tertiary education.
AdlerP. A.AdlerP. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers University Press.
2.
AdlerP. A.KlessS. J.AdlerP. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65(3), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112807
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD.KringA. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
5.
AndreouE. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306067286.
6.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
7.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Friends and peers. Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach. Pearson Education, Inc.
8.
BarryC. M.MadsenS. D.DeGraceA. (2016). Growing up with a little help from their friends in emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 215–229). Oxford University Press.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
10.
BergerC.BatanovaM.CanceJ. D. (2015). Aggressive and prosocial? Examining latent profiles of behavior, social status, machiavellianism, and empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2230–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0298-9.
11.
BorchC.HydeA.CillessenA. H. N. (2011). The role of attractiveness and aggression in high school popularity. Social Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9131-1.
12.
BoxerP.TisakM. S.GoldsteinS. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.ef.
13.
ButcherJ. (1986). Longitudinal analysis of adolescent girls’ aspirations at school and perceptions of popularity. Adolescence, 21(81), 133–143.
14.
CaravitaS. C. S.CillessenA. H. N. (2012). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00632.x
15.
CarloG.RandallB. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
16.
CasperD. M.CardN. A.BarlowC. (2020). Relational aggression and victimization during adolescence: A meta-analytic review of unique associations with popularity, peer acceptance, rejection, and friendship characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.012
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
19.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). Guilford Press.
20.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004, January-February). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A.CoppotelliH. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
24.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A.KupersmidtJ. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In AsherS. R.CoieJ. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17-59). Cambridge University Press.
25.
CrickN. R.GrotpeterJ. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131945
26.
CrossS. E.MadsonL. (1997). Elaboration of models of the self: Reply to Baumeister and Sommer (1997) and Martin and Ruble (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.51
27.
De BruynE. H.CillessenA. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406293966
28.
DijkstraJ. K.LindenbergS.VerhulstF. C.OrmelJ.VeenstraR. (2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and norm-breaking behaviors: Moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00594.x
29.
DumasT. M.DavisJ. P.EllisW. E. (2019). Is it good to be bad? A longitudinal analysis of adolescent popularity motivations as a predictor of engagement in relational aggression and risk behaviors. Youth & Society, 51(5), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17700319.
30.
EderD. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Surgical Endoscopy, 58(3), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112416.
31.
Findley-Van NostrandD. (2016). The role of peer status in the self and aggression in adolescence and early adulthood. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.
32.
Findley-Van NostrandD.OjanenT. (2018). Forms of prosocial behaviors are differentially linked to social goals and peer status in adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(6), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1518894.
33.
FindleyD.OjanenT. (2013). Adolescent resource control: Associations with physical and relational aggression, prosocial and withdrawn behaviors, and peer regard. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(6), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413503420
34.
FlanneryK. M.SmithR. L. (2017). Are peer status, friendship quality, and friendship stability equivalent markers of social competence?Ageing Research Reviews, 2(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-016-0042-z
GommansR.SandstromM. J.StevensG. W. J. M.ter BogtT. F. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2017). Popularity, likeability, and peer conformity: Four field experiments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.001
37.
HartlA. C.LaursenB.CantinS.VitaroF. (2020). A test of the bistrategic control hypothesis of adolescent popularity. Child Development, 91(3), e635–e648. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13269
38.
HawleyP. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470
39.
HawleyP. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted machiavellian. The Milbank Quarterly, 49(3), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0013
40.
HawleyP. H. (2014). The duality of human nature: Coercion and prosociality in youths’ hierarchy ascension and social success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414548417
41.
HawleyP. H.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407084054
42.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
43.
KleiserM.MayeuxL. (2021). Popularity and gender prototypicality: An experimental approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01344-5
44.
KoširK.ZorjanS.MiklA.HorvatM. (2021). Social goals and bullying: Examining the moderating role of self‐perceived popularity, social status insecurity and classroom variability in popularity. Social Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12547.
45.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635
46.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
47.
LambertN. M.StillmanT. F.HicksJ. A.KambleS.BaumeisterR. F.FinchamF. D. (2013). To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499186
48.
Laninga‐WijnenL.HarakehZ.GarandeauC. F.DijkstraJ. K.VeenstraR.VolleberghW. A. M. (2019). Classroom popularity hierarchy predicts prosocial and aggressive popularity norms across the school year. Child Development, 90(5), e637–e653. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13228
49.
LansuT. A. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2012). Peer status in emerging adulthood: Associations of popularity and preference with social roles and behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411402341
50.
LeaseA. M.KennedyC. A.AxelrodJ. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00188
51.
LockeK. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6
52.
LockeK. D. (2015). Agentic and communal social motives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(10), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12201
53.
LongY.ZhouH.LiY. (2020). Relational victimization and internalizing problems: Moderation of popularity and mediation of popularity status insecurity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01177-x
54.
LuT.JinS.LiL.NiuL.ChenX.FrenchD. C. (2018a). Longitudinal associations between popularity and aggression in Chinese middle and high school adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 54(12), 2291–2301. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000591
55.
LuT.LiL.NiuL.JinS.FrenchD. C. (2018b). Relations between popularity and prosocial behavior in middle school and high school Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416687411
56.
MalamutS. T.DawesM.van den BergY. H. M.LansuT. A. M.SchwartzD.CillessenA. H. N. (2021a). Adolescent victim types across the popularity status hierarchy: Differences in internalizing symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(12), 2444-2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01498-w.
57.
MalamutS. T.van den BergY. H. M.LansuT. A. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2021b). Bidirectional associations between popularity, popularity goal, and aggression, alcohol use and prosocial behaviors in adolescence: A 3-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(2), 298-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01308-9.
58.
MayeuxL.HouserJ. J.DychesK. D. (2011). Social acceptance and popularity: Two distinct forms of peer status. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.)Popularity in the peer system, (pp. 79–102). Guilford Press.
59.
MayeuxL.KleiserM. (2020). A gender prototypicality theory of adolescent peer popularity. Ageing Research Reviews, 5(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00123-z
60.
McAdamsD. P (1992). The intimacy motive. In SmithC. P.AtkinsonJ. W.McClellandD. C.VeroffJ. (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 224–228). Cambridge University Press.
MeijsN.CillessenA. H. N.ScholteR. H. J.SegersE.SpijkermanR. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9
63.
MertenD. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Surgical Endoscopy, 70(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673207
64.
NangleD. W.ErdleyC. A.NewmanJ. E.MasonC. A.CarpenterE. M. (2003). Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(4), 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_7
OjanenT.Findley-Van NostrandD. (2014). Social goals, aggression, peer preference, and popularity: Longitudinal links during middle school. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2134–2143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037137
67.
OjanenT.GrönroosM.SalmivalliC. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.699
68.
ParkhurstJ. T.AsherS. R. (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.231
69.
PrinsteinM. J.CillessenA. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. The Milbank Quarterly, 49(3), 310–342. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0015
70.
PrinsteinM. J.GilettaM. (2016). Peer relations and developmental psychopathology. In CicchettiD. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (pp. 527–579). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
71.
RedheadD.ChengJ. T.DriverC.FoulshamT.O’GormanR. (2019). On the dynamics of social hierarchy: A longitudinal investigation of the rise and fall of prestige, dominance, and social rank in naturalistic task groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.12.001
72.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.CaspiA. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 375–398). Guilford Press.
73.
RoseA. J.GlickG. C.SmithR. L. (2011). In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 103–122). Guilford Press.
74.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
75.
RoseA. J.SwensonL. P.WallerE. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378
76.
RuschoffB.DijkstraJ. K.VeenstraR.LindenbergS. (2015). Peer status beyond adolescence: Types and behavioral associations. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.013
77.
SalmivalliC.OjanenT.HaanpääJ.PeetsK. (2005). I’m OK but you’re not” and other peer-relational schemas: Explaining individual differences in children’s social goals. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.363
78.
SandstromM. J.CillessenA. H. N. (2010). Life after high school: Adjustment of popular teens in emerging adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(4), 474–499. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2010.0000
79.
ScottB. A. (2013). A conceptual framework for the study of popularity in the workplace. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612464092
80.
ScottB. A.JudgeT. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012951
81.
StillmanT. F.BaumeisterR. F.LambertN. M.CrescioniA. W.DeWallC. N.FinchamF. D. (2009). Alone and without purpose: Life loses meaning following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.007
82.
StoeckartP. F.StrickM.BijleveldE.AartsH. (2018). The implicit power motive predicts decisions in line with perceived instrumentality. Motivation and Emotion, 42(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9687-1
83.
SuessenbachF.LoughnanS.SchönbrodtF. D.MooreA. B. (2019). The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2184
84.
TeunissenH. A.SpijkermanR.PrinsteinM. J.CohenG. L.EngelsR. C. M. E.ScholteR. H. J. (2012). Adolescents’ conformity to their peers’ pro‐alcohol and anti‐alcohol norms: The power of popularity. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(7), 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01728.x
85.
UnderwoodM. K.GalenB. R.PaquetteJ. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can’t we all just get along?Social Development, 10(2), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00162
86.
VaillancourtT.HymelS. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20138
87.
WeaverJ. R.BossonJ. K. (2011). I feel like I know you: Sharing negative attitudes of others promotes feelings of familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398364
88.
WeisfeldG. E.BlochS. A.IversJ. W. (1983). A factor analytic study of peer-perceived dominance in adolescent boys. Adolescence, 18(70), 229–243
89.
WeisfeldG. E.BlochS. A.IversJ. W. (1984). Possible determinants of social dominance among adolescent girls. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1984.10532456
90.
WernerN. E.CrickN. R. (1999). Relational aggression and social-psychological adjustment in a college sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(4), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.615
91.
WoltersN.KnoorsH.CillessenA. H. N.VerhoevenL. (2014). Behavioral, personality, and communicative predictors of acceptance and popularity in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613510403
92.
WrightM. F.LiY. (2013 May–June). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21470
93.
XieH.SwiftD. J.CairnsB. D.CairnsR. B. (2002). Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Social Development, 11(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00195
94.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.GeigerT. C.CrickN. R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(4), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431605279841
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
