The present study aimed to explore how economic and social resources interact with emerging adults’ vocational identity development. Emerging adults (N = 108) from different socioeconomic backgrounds in Turkey were interviewed. Participants' reflections on the intersection between socioeconomic resources and vocational identity development were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Results revealed that access to economic and social resources was described as a mediating factor between vocational choices and identity expression. Participants’ reports also showed that economic and social resources interacted with vocational identity development by affecting vocational exploration, expectations of vocational choices, perceived support and guidance, and future projections. While participants’ socioeconomic background was a significant factor affecting the prevalence of participants’ experiences, connections between the subthemes also indicated different clusters of experiences. Results provide important insights regarding the intersection between socioeconomic resources and vocational identity and the boundary and promoting factors leading emerging adults to pursue their vocational aspirations.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AriesE.SeiderM. (2005). The interactive relationship between class identity and the college experience: The case of lower income students. Qualitative Sociology, 28(4), 419-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-005-8366-1
3.
AriesE.SeiderM. (2007). The role of social class in the formation of identity: A study of public and elite private college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(2), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.2.137-157
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
AzmitiaM.SyedM.RadmacherK. (2013). Finding your niche: Identity and emotional support in emerging adults’ adjustment to the transition to college. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 744-761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12037
7.
BaumeisterR. F.MuravenM. (1996). Identity as adaptation to social, cultural, and historical context. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0039.
8.
BaxterA.BrittonC. (2001). Risk, identity and change: Becoming a mature student. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210100200066
9.
Berríos-AllisonA. C. (2005). Family influences on college students’ occupational identity. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(2), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270320
10.
BlusteinD. L.ChavesA. P.DiemerM. A.GallagherL. A.MarshallK. G.SirinS.BhatiK. S. (2002). Voices of the forgotten half: The role of social class in the school-to-work transition. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.49.3.311
11.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258): Greenwood.
BurkholderARElenbaasLKillenM (2020). Children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of intergroup exclusion in interracial and interwealth peer contexts. Child Development, 91(2), e512-e527. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13249
CanerH. A.BayhanS. (2020). High-stakes examination policies and transformation of the Turkish education system. International Journal of Educational Development, 79(20), 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102263
16.
ChavesA. P.DiemerM. A.BlusteinD. L.GallagherL. A.DeVoyJ. E.CasaresM. T.PerryJ. C. (2004). Conceptions of work: The view from urban youth. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.275
17.
ÇokF.AtakH. (2015). Emerging adulthood in Turkey: Does it (yet) exist?Online Journal of Counseling & Education, 4(3), 46-75.
18.
DoğanA.CebioğluS. (2011). Emerging adulthood: A period between adolescence and adulthood. Turkish Psychological Articles, 14(28), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-019-09344-x
19.
DumanA. (2008). Education and income inequality in Turkey: Does schooling matter?Financial Theory and Practice, 32(3), 369-385.
20.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis: W. W. Norton.
21.
GonulB. (2020). How children and their parents reason about inequalities and exclusion based on socioeconomic status: The roles of children’s age, family socioeconomic background and exclusion context: Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12625542/index.pdf
22.
GuettermanT.CreswellJ. W.KuckartzU. (2015). Using joint displays and MAXQDA software to represent the results of mixed methods research. In McCruddenM. T.SchrawG.BuckendahlC. (Eds), Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting, and reporting data (pp. 145-175). Information Age Publishing.
23.
HittiA.MulveyK. L.RutlandA.AbramsD.KillenM. (2014). When is it okay to exclude a member of the ingroup? Children's and adolescents’ social reasoning. Social Development, 23(3), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12047
24.
JohnstonbaughM. (2018). Conquering with capital: Social, cultural, and economic capital’s role in combating socioeconomic disadvantage and contributing to educational attainment. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(5), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1406069
KağıtçıbaşıÇ. (1996). Family and human development across cultures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27.
KalaycıoğluS.ÇelikK.ÇelenÜ.TürkyılmazS. (2010). Developing a tool for the measurement of socioeconomic status (SES) from a representative sample: The case of Ankara city center. Journal of Sociological Research, 13(1), 182-220.
28.
KapcıE. G.KüçükerS. (2006). Of psychometric properties with Turkish university students. The parental bonding instrument: Evaluation (17, pp. 286-295). Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi.
29.
KarpD. A.HolmstromL. L.CrayP. S. (1998). Leaving home for college: Expectations for selective reconstruction of self. Symbolic Interaction, 21(3), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1998.21.3.253
30.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357
31.
KrogerJ. (2007). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood (2nd ed.): Sage.
32.
KrogerJ. (2015). Identity development through adulthood: the move toward “wholeness. In McLeanK. C.SyedM. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 65-80): Oxford University Press.
MarciaJ. E.WatermanA. S.MattessonD. R.ArcherS. L.OrlofskyJ. L. (Eds), (1993). Ego identity. A handbook for psychosocial research: Springer-Verlag.
35.
MorsunbulU.CrocettiE.CokF.MeeusW. (2016). Identity statuses and psychosocial functioning in Turkish youth: a person-centered approach. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.001.
36.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
37.
OstroveJ. M.ColeE. R. (2003). Privileging class: toward a critical psychology of social class in the context of education. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 677-692. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00084.x
OysermanD.JohnsonE.JamesL. (2011). Seeing the destination but not the path: Effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on school-focused possible self content and linked behavioral strategies. Self and Identity, 10(4), 474-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2010.487651
40.
PhillipsT. M.PittmanJ. F. (2003). Identity processes in poor adolescents: Exploring the linkages between economic disadvantage and the primary task of adolescence. Identity, 3, 115-129. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S1532706XID030202
41.
RobinsonO. C. (2011). Relational analysis: an add-on technique for aiding data integration in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.572745
SkorikovV.VondracekF. W. (1998). Vocational identity development: Its relationship to other identity domains and to overall identity development. Journal of Career Assessment, 6(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279800600102
44.
SkorikovV. B.VondracekF. W. (2007). Vocational identity. In SkorikovV. B.PattonW. (Eds), Career development in childhood and adolescence (pp. 143-168).
45.
SümerN.AktürkE. G.HelvaciE. (2010). Summary psychological effects of parenting styles and behaviors: A review of studies in Turkey. Turk Psikoloji Yazilari, 13(25), 42-59.
46.
SunarD. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In OzdalgaE.LiljestromR. (Eds), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 217-238). Swedish Research Institute.
47.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.SinesM.C. (2012). Utilizing mixed methods in psychological research. In WeinerI.SchinkaJ.A.VelicerW. F. (Eds), Handbook of Psychology (Second Edition). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202015
YoderA. E. (2000). Barriers to ego identity status formation: a contextual qualification of marcia's identity status paradigm. Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0298
