Individualism,Collectivism,and Well-being Among a Sample of Emerging Adults in the United States

Abstract

An increasing body of research suggests that emerging adults living in Western societies are becoming more individualistic and such increases in individualism are associated with reduced well-being. The present study examined relationships between well-being and individualism and collectivism among 1906 emerging adults in the US, aged 18–25. We measured individualism and collectivism distinguishing horizontal and vertical dimensions of these constructs, and we measured well-being in terms of depression, anxiety, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, and neuroticism. Regression analyses found that individualism was negatively related to well-being, and these relationships varied somewhat between horizontal and vertical individualism. Horizontal collectivism was positively related to all measures of well-being, and vertical collectivism was positively related to three measures. These findings increase our understanding of the roles individualism and collectivism play in the psychological well-being of emerging adults, including the importance of distinguishing horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism.

Keywords

well-being individualism collectivism social orientation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Connor

K. M.

Kobak

K. A.

Churchill

L. E.

Katzelnick

Davidson

J. R. T.

(2001). Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 14(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.1055.

Eckersley

(2011). A new narrative of young people’s health and well-being. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(5), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2011.565043.

Eckersley

Dear

(2002). Cultural correlates of youth suicide. Social Science & Medicine, 55(11), 1891–1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00319-7.

Eskin

(2013). The effects of individualistic-collectivistic value orientations on non-fatal suicidal behavior and attitudes in Turkish adolescents and young adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(6), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12072.

Germani

Delvecchio

J.-B.

Lis

Nartova-Bochaver

S. K.

Vazsonyi

A. T.

, et al (2021). The link between individualism–collectivism and life satisfaction among emerging adults from four countries. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(2), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12259.

Humphrey

Bliuc

A. M.

Molenberghs

(2020). The social contract revisited: A re-examination of the influence individualistic and collectivistic value systems have on the psychological wellbeing of young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1590541.

John

O. P.

Naumann

L. P.

Soto

C. J.

(2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). The Guilford Press.

Nelson

L. J.

(2021). The Theory of emerging adulthood 20 years later: A look at where it has taken us, what we know now, and where we need to go. Emerging Adulthood, 9(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696820950884.

Osman

Wong

J. L.

Bagge

C. L.

Freedenthal

Gutierrez

P. M.

Lozano

(2012). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21): Further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(12), 1322–1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21908.

10.

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3.

11.

Putnam

R. D.

(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

12.

Radloff

L. S.

(1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.

13.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.

14.

Ryff

C. D.

Keyes

C. L. M.

(1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.

15.

Scott

Ciarrochi

Deane

F. P.

(2004). Disadvantages of being an individualist in an individualistic culture: Idiocentrism, emotional competence, stress, and mental health. Australian Psychologist, 39(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001701861.

16.

Triandis

H. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118.

17.

Twenge

J. M.

Campbell

W. K.

Freeman

E. C.

(2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1045-1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027408.

18.

Twenge

J. M.

Foster

J. D.

(2008). Mapping the scale of the narcissism epidemic: Increases in narcissism 2002-2007 within ethnic groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1619-1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.014.

19.

Zalewska

A. M.

Zawadzka

(2016). Subjective well-being and citizenship dimensions according to individualism and collectivism beliefs among Polish adolescents. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 4(3), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2016.61520.