We investigated the relations between the endorsement of ambivalent sexism and relationship qualities in heterosexual romantic couples during emerging adulthood. The sample included 94 heterosexual emerging adult dating couples attending a public university (Mage = 21 years; 39% White, 25% Latinx, 11% Asian, and 18% Other). Each partner separately completed survey measures of ambivalent sexism and perceived relationship satisfaction and conflict. Dyadic analyses were performed using structural equation modeling. Results indicated men’s hostile sexism predicted lower satisfaction and more conflict for men and their partners, whereas men’s benevolent sexism (BS) predicted more satisfaction and lower conflict for men and their partners. Women’s BS was negatively related to the length of the couple’s relationship. The results are discussed in relation to ways that ambivalent sexism may affect the dating relationships of many emerging adults in college settings and how these effects may change over time in relationships and at later life stages.
AbeleA. E.SpurkD. (2011). The dual impact of gender and the influence of timing of parenthood on men’s and women’s career development: Longitudinal findings. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398181
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). Socialization in emerging adulthood: From the family to the wider world, from socialization to self-socialization. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 85–108). Guilford Press.
4.
BareketO.KahalonR.ShnabelN.GlickP. (2018). The Madonna-whore dichotomy: Men who perceive women’s nurturance and sexuality as mutually exclusive endorse patriarchy and show lower relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 79(9–10), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0895-7
5.
BattagliaD. M.RichardF. D.DatteriD. L.LordC. G. (1998). Breaking up is (relatively) easy to do: A script for the dissolution of close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598156007
6.
BeckerJ. C.SwimJ. K. (2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Social Psychology, 43(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000091
7.
BeckerJ. C.ZawadzkiM. J.ShieldsS. A. (2014). Confronting and reducing sexism: A call for research on intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12081
8.
BermúdezJ. M.SharpE. A.TaniguchiN. (2015). Tapping into the complexity: Ambivalent sexism, dating, and familial beliefs among young Hispanics. Journal of Family Issues, 36(10), 1274–1295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13506706
9.
BiglerR. S.WrightY. F. (2014). Reading, writing, arithmetic, and racism? Risks and benefits to teaching children about intergroup biases. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12057
CasadB. J.SalazarM. M.MacinaV. (2015). The real versus the ideal: Predicting relationship satisfaction and well-being from endorsement of marriage myths and benevolent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314528304
12.
CaseK. A.HensleyR.AndersonA. (2014). Reflecting on heterosexual and male privilege: Interventions to raise awareness. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12088
13.
CateR. M.LevinL. A.RichmondL. S. (2002). Premarital relationship stability: A review of recent research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502192005
14.
ChenW.WuC. (2017). Transmission of ideas about love: Filial piety, love attitudes, and romantic satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12191
15.
ConnorR. A.GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2016). Ambivalent sexism in the twenty-first century. In SibleyC.BarlowF. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 295–320). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.013
16.
CoyleE. F.Van LeerE.SchroederK. M.FulcherM. (2015). Planning to have it all: Emerging adults’ expectations of future work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 72(11–12), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0492-y
17.
CrossE. J.OverallN. C.HammondM. D.FletcherG. J. O. (2017). When does men’s hostile sexism predict relationship aggression? The moderating role of partner commitment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616672000
18.
CundiffJ. L.ZawadzkiM. J.DanubeC. L.ShieldsS. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12087
19.
DavisK. E.Latty-MannH. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407587044002
20.
DavisK. E.ToddM. J. (1982). Friendship and love relationships. Advances in Descriptive Psychology, 2, 79–122.
21.
EatonA. A.RoseS. (2011). Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using sex roles. Sex Roles, 64(11–12), 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9957-9
22.
ExpósitoF.HerreraM. C.MoyaM.GlickP. (2010). Don’t rock the boat: Women’s benevolent sexism predicts fears of marital violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01539.x
23.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
25.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.AdetounB.OsagieJ. E.AkandeA.AlaoA.AnnetjeB.WillemsenT. M.ChipetaK.DardenneB.DijksterhuisA.WigboldusD.EckesT.Six-MaternaI.ExpósitoF.…LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
26.
GoodcaseE. T.NalboneD. P.HeckerL. L.LattyC. (2018). The role of attachment anxiety and avoidance in communication modality and relationship quality of romantic relationships initiated online. American Journal of Family Therapy, 46(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2018.1461032
27.
GottmanJ.GottmanJ. S.GreendorferA.WahbeM. (2014). An empirically based approach to couples’ conflict. In ColemanP. T.DeutschM.MarcusE. C. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 898–920). Jossey-Bass.
28.
GroseR. G.GrabeS.KohfeldtD. (2014). Sexual education, gender ideology, and youth sexual empowerment. Journal of Sex Research, 51(7), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.809511
29.
HammondM. D.MilojevP.HuangY.SibleyC. G. (2018). Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(7), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617727588
30.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2013a). Men’s hostile sexism and biased perceptions of intimate partners: Fostering dissatisfaction and negative behavior in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499026
31.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2013b). When relationships do not live up to benevolent ideals: Women’s benevolent sexism and sensitivity to relationship problems. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1939
32.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2014). Endorsing benevolent sexism magnifies willingness to dissolve relationships when facing partner-ideal discrepancies. Personal Relationships, 21(2), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12031
33.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2017). Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416686213
34.
HammondM. D.SibleyC. G.OverallN. C. (2014). The allure of sexism: Psychological entitlement fosters women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613506124
35.
Hopkins-DoyleA.SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M.CalogeroR. M. (2019). Flattering to deceive: Why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000135
36.
JohnsonH. D.KentA.YaleE. (2012). Examination of identity and romantic relationship intimacy associations with well-being in emerging adulthood. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 12(4), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2012.716381
37.
Katz-WiseS. L.PriessH. A.HydeJ. S. (2010). Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017820
38.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
39.
KilianskiS. E.RudmanL. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?Sex Roles, 39(5–6), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018814924402
40.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
41.
LeaperC. (2019). Young adults’ conversational strategies during negotiation and self-disclosure in same-gender and mixed-gender friendships. Sex Roles, 81(9–10), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1014-0
42.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T.GlickP.ChenZ. (2002). Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (Hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x
43.
LevyM. B.DavisK. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(4), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407588054004
44.
MegíasJ. L.Toro-GarcíaV.Carretero-DiosH. (2018). The Acceptance of Myths About Intimate Partner Violence Against Women (AMIVAW) Scale: Development and validation in Spanish and English. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317742638
45.
MivilleM. L.MendezN.LouieM. (2016). Latino/a gender roles: A content analysis of empirical research from 1982 to 2013. Journal of Latino/a Psychology, 5(3), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000072
46.
NoronaJ. C.PreddyT. M.WelshD. P. (2016). How gender shapes emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 62–86). Oxford University Press.
47.
NoronaJ. C.WelshD. P. (2017). Romantic relationship dissolution in emerging adulthood: Introduction to the special issue. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817712801
48.
OswaldD. L.BaalbakiM.KirkmanM. (2019). Experiences with benevolent sexism: Scale development and associations with women’s well-being. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0933-5
49.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022727
50.
PahlkeE.BiglerR. S.MartinC. L. (2014). Can fostering children’s ability to challenge sexism improve critical analysis, internalization, and enactment of inclusive, egalitarian peer relationships?Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12050
51.
ParkerK.WangW. (2013, March14). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org
52.
PaynterA.LeaperC. (2016). Heterosexual dating double standards in undergraduate women and men. Sex Roles, 75(7–8), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0628-8
53.
RobnettR. D.LeaperC. (2013). “Girls don’t propose! Ew.” A mixed-methods examination of marriage tradition preferences and benevolent sexism in emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558412447871
54.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. Guilford Press.
55.
SchneiderP. (1996). Mutuality in couples therapy. In SchneiderP. (Ed.), The Hatherleigh guide to marriage and family therapy (pp. 267–284). Hatherleigh Press.
56.
SellsT. G. C.GanongL. (2017). Emerging adults’ expectations and preferences for gender role arrangements in long-term heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 76(3–4), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0658-2
57.
ShulmanS.ConnollyJ. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467330
58.
SibleyC. G.BeckerJ. C. (2012). On the nature of sexist ambivalence: Profiling ambivalent and univalent sexists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1870
59.
SibleyC. G.OverallN. C. (2011). A dual process motivational model of ambivalent sexism and gender differences in romantic partner preferences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311401838
60.
StavrovaO. (2019). Having a happy spouse is associated with lowered risk of mortality. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619835147
61.
VikiG. T.AbramsD.HutchisonP. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49(9–10), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749
