While the relationship between individual factors, including personality dimensions, and tertiary academic outcomes is well established, the mechanisms by which these factors influence academic success have been less fully explored. This study tested one potential mechanism, the developmental task of role balance, by which personality may influence college success. During emerging adulthood, young people simultaneously explore and establish both individual and relational role identities. As part of this process, these emerging adults work to balance their individual roles with their relational roles in order to maximize success and satisfaction across domains. Using a college student sample (N = 299), this study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test role balance as a mediator between personality dimensions and multiple indicators of college success. Tests indicated that role balance partially mediates the relationship between conscientiousness and neuroticism and college satisfaction but is not associated with other traditional measures of college achievement (grade point average, intention to withdraw).
AllenT. D.HerstD. E.BruckC. S.SuttonM. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.
2.
AllenT. D.KiburzK. M. (2012). Trait mindfulness and work–family balance among working parents: The mediating effects of vitality and sleep quality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 372–379.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
4.
BishopJ. L.WelshD. P.LounsburyJ. W.NoronaJ. C. (2016). Individual and relational role balance: A scale validation study. College Student Journal, 50, 531–550.
5.
BaumS.MaJ. (2007). Education pays. Princeton, NJ: College Board.
6.
BidermanM. D.NguyenN. T.SebrenJ. (2008). Time-on-task mediates the conscientiousness–performance relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 887–897.
7.
BidjeranoT.DaiD. Y. (2007). The relationship between the Big-Five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81.
8.
BurksS. V.LewisC.KiviP. A.WienerA.AndersonJ. E.GötteL.…RustichiniA. (2015). Cognitive skills, personality, and economic preferences in collegiate success. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 30–44.
9.
ByronK. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.
10.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2003a). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319–338.
11.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2003b). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 237–250.
12.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2009). Mainly openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524–529.
13.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
14.
ConardM. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 339–346.
15.
CucinaJ. M.VasilopoulosN. L. (2005). Nonlinear personality–performance relationships and the spurious moderating effects of traitedness. Journal of Personality, 73, 227–260.
16.
De FeyterT.CaersR.VignaC.BeringsD. (2012). Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 439–448.
17.
FroneM. R.RussellM.CooperM. L. (1997). Relation of work-family conflict to health outcomes: A four year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 70, 325–335.
18.
FroneM. R.YardleyJ. K.MarkelK. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 145–167.
19.
GröpelP. (2006). Rovnovaha zˇivotnýchvo vztˇahu k naplnenosti potrieb a spokojnosti so ˇzivotom [Balancing work and personal life: Relation to needs and life satisfaction]. Cˇeskoslovenská Psychologie, 1, 71–83.
20.
GrzywaczJ. G.MarksN. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126.
21.
HayesN.JosephS. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 723–727.
22.
HeckhausenJ.WroschC.SchulzR. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60.
23.
KellowayE. K.GottliebB. H.BarhamL. (1999). The source, nature, and direction of work and family conflict: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 337–346.
24.
KossekE.OzekiC. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139.
25.
LeH.CasillasA.RobbinsS. B.LangleyR. (2005). Motivational and skills, social, and self-management predictors of college outcomes: Constructing the student readiness inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 482–508.
26.
LenaghanJ. A.SenguptaK. (2007). Role conflict, role balance and affect: A model of well-being of the working student. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9, 88–100.
27.
LounsburyJ. W.SaudargasR. A.GibsonL. W. (2004). An investigation of personality traits in relation to intention to withdraw from college. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 517–534.
28.
LounsburyJ. W.SaudargasR. A.GibsonL. W.LeongF. T. (2005). An investigation of broad and narrow personality traits in relation to general and domain-specific life satisfaction of college students. Research in Higher Education, 46, 707–729.
29.
MacCannC.FogartyG. J.RobertsR. D. (2012). Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 618–623.
30.
MarksS. R.McDermidS. M. (1996). Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 417–432.
31.
MayselessO.KerenE. (2014). Finding a meaningful life as a developmental task in emerging adulthood: The domains of love and work across cultures. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 63–73.
32.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.,Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 116.
33.
Musgrave-MarquartD.BromleyS. P.DalleyM. B. (1997). Personality, academic attribution, and substance use as predictors of academic achievement in college students. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12, 501–511.
34.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1995–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
35.
O’ConnorM. C.PaunonenS. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990.
36.
O’DriscollM. P.BroughP.KalliathT. J. (2004), Work/family conflict, psychological well-being, satisfaction and social support: A longitudinal study in New Zealand. Equal Opportunities International, 23, 36–56.
37.
PaunonenS. V.AshtonM. C. (2013). On the prediction of academic performance with personality traits: A replication study. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 778–781.
38.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.
39.
PoropatA. E. (2014a). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 239–252.
40.
PoropatA. E. (2014b). Other-rated personality and academic performance: Evidence and implications. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 24–32.
41.
RantanenJ.PulkkinenL.KinnunenU. (2005). The Big Five personality dimensions, work-family conflict, and psychological distress: A longitudinal view. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 155–166.
42.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC. (2009). Conscientiousness and achievement motivation predict performance. European Journal of Personality, 23, 589–605.
43.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC.BondR. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.
44.
RobbinsS. B.AllenJ.CasillasA.PetersonC. H.LeH. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 598–616.
45.
RobersonP. N.FishJ. N.OlmsteadS. B.FinchamF. D. (2015). College adjustment, relationship satisfaction, and management: A cross-lag assessment of developmental “spillover”. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 244–254.
46.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.
47.
RothbartM. K. (2007). Temperament, development, and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 207–212.
48.
SchulenbergJ. E.SchoonI. (2012). The transition to adulthood across time and space: Overview of special section. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3, 164–172.
49.
ShulmanS.ConnollyJ. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 27–39.
50.
SneedJ. R.HamagamiF.McArdleJ. J.CohenP.ChenH. (2007). The dynamic interdependence of developmental domains across emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 351–362.
51.
SteelP.SchmidtJ.ShultzJ. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.
52.
Steele-JohnsonD.LeasK. (2013). Importance of race, gender, and personality in predicting academic performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1736–1744.
53.
TabakF.NguyenN.BasurayT.DarrowW. (2009). Exploring the impact of personality on performance: How time-on-task moderates the mediation by self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 823–828.
54.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
TrapmannS.HellB.HirnJ. W.SchulerH. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the Big Five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215, 132–151.
56.
VedelA. (2014). The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 66–76.
57.
VedelA.ThomsenD. K.LarsenL. (2015). Personality, academic majors and performance: Revealing complex patterns. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 69–76.
58.
VoydanoffP. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work-family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822–836.
59.
WayneJ. H.MusiscaN.FleesonW. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the Big Five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108–130.
