This response to Jeffrey Arnett’s article on social class and the development of emerging adults points out a number of limitation in the data, analysis, and conclusions. For reasons outlined in my commentary, I take issue with his conclusion that social class differences in the development of young adults are modest. I try to show why that interpretation of the data presented is premature and unwarranted.
BensonJ.FurstenbergF. F. (2007). Entry into adulthood: Are adult role transitions meaningful markers of adult identity? In MacDonaldR. (Ed.), Advances in life course research, vol. 11. Constructing adulthood agency and subjectivity in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 199–224). London, England: Elsevier Science.
2.
CongerR.ElderG. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: The Iowa youth and families project. In CongerR.ElderG. H. (Eds.), Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Aldine.
3.
ElderG. H. (1974). The children of the great depression. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
EriksonE. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: Norton.
5.
FriedenbergE. (1964). The vanishing adolescent. New York, NY: Dell.
6.
FurstenbergF. F. (2000). The sociology of adolescence and youth in the 1990s: A critical commentary. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 896–910.
7.
FurstenbergF. F.SetterstenR. A.JrRumbautR. G. (Eds.). (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
GoodmanP. (1960). Growing up absurd: Problems of youth in the organized system. New York, NY: Random House.
9.
KennisonK. (1968). Young radicals: Notes on committed youth. New York, NY: Harvest Books.
10.
SyedM. (2015). Emerging adulthood: Developmental stage, theory, or nonsense? In ArnettJ. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 11–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
