Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Little is known about the role parental mediation plays in emerging adult technology use. As such, the current exploratory study was designed to identify the prevalence of parental mediation during this developmental period, ascertain how parents mediate, and understand the reasons parents elect not to mediate. Eighty-two unmarried college participants and 76 of their parents participated in this descriptive qualitative study. A majority of emerging adults and parents reported that parents did not mediate their child’s interactive technology. Reasons for not monitoring revolved around parental trust, child maturity, and parental priorities. For those who reported parental mediation, monitoring content and usage was the mediation technique most frequently implemented.

Keywords

parental mediation Internet monitoring parenting cell phones

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aquilino

W. S.

(2006). Family relationships and support systems in emerging adulthood. In Arnett

J. J.

Tanner

J. L.

(Eds.), Emerging adults in America (pp. 193–218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Brown

J. D.

Bobkowski

P. S.

(2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 95–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x

Coyne

S. M.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Howard

(2013). Emerging in a digital world a decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 125–137. doi:10.1177/2167696813479782

Hsieh

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687

Lee

(2012). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: Effective for what and for whom? New Media Society, 0, 1–16. doi:10.1177/1461444812452412

Livingstone

Helsper

(2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 581–599. doi:10.1080/08838150802437396

Nathanson

(2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 201–220. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Coyne

S. M.

Fraser

A. M.

Dyer

W. J.

Yorgason

J. B.

(2012). Parents and adolescents growing up in the digital age: Latent growth curve analysis of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1153–1165. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.005

Schooler

Kim

J. L.

Sorsoli

(2006). Setting rules or sitting down: Parental mediation of television consumption and adolescent self-esteem, body image, and sexuality. Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 3, 49–62. doi:10.1525/srsp.2006.3.4.49

10.

Vaterlaus

J. M.

Beckert

T. E.

Tulane

Bird

C. V.

(2014). “They always ask what I’m doing and who I’m talking to”: Parental mediation of adolescent interactive technology Use. Marriage & Family Review, 50, 691–713. doi:10.1080/01494929.2014.938795

11.

Vaterlaus

J. M.

Tulane

(in press). Digital generation gaps in parent-adolescent relationships. In Bruess

C. J.

(Ed.), Family Communication in the Digital Age.

12.

Wang

Bianchi

S. M.

Raley

S. B.

(2005). Teenagers’ internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1249–1258. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00214.x

“At a Certain Age It’s Not Appropriate to Monitor One’s Child”

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References