Following social identity theory, the present investigation examines the political benefits of self-identification as a member of the disability community for disability-rights advocacy across college (n = 204), community (N = 93), and international (N = 268) samples of adults with disabilities. Consistent with predictions, emerging adults (EAs) with disabilities (n = 204) demonstrated more political conviction and were twice as likely to be involved in disability-rights advocacy as nondisabled peers (n = 1,111). Studies 2 and 3 revealed that disability identification predicted disability-rights advocacy, preferences for affiliation with other disabled people, and stronger perceptions of solidarity, personal, and group discrimination. Age-group moderated effects in Study 2 such that EAs least identified as disabled reported the lowest levels of solidarity and the least awareness of discrimination. Implications of social identification for the political involvements of stigmatized groups are discussed along with complexities related to age, impairment visibility, and duration of disability.
ArnettJ. J. (1997). Young people’s conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Youth & Society, 29, 3–23.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BallT. C.Nario-RedmondM. R. (2014). Positive social identity interventions: Finding a conduit for well-being in members of stigmatized groups. In ParksA. C.SchuellerS. M. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 327–343). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
BarnarttS.SchrinerK.ScotchR. (2001). Advocacy and political action. In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 430–449). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Bat-ChavaY. (1994). Group identification and self-esteem of deaf adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 494–502.
6.
BeresfordB. (2004). On the road to nowhere? Young disabled people and transition. Child Care Health and Development, 30, 581–587.
7.
BergerI. E.AlwittL. F. (1996). Attitude conviction: A self-reflective measure of attitude strength. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 555–572.
8.
BovjbergB. D. (2010). Voters with disabilities: More polling places had no potential impediments than in 2000, but challenges remain. GAO-09-685. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
9.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In SwimJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 243–266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
10.
BraultM. W. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.
11.
ChalkH. M. (2016). Disability self-categorization in emerging adults: Relationship with self-esteem, perceived esteem, mindfulness and markers of adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 200–206.
12.
CharmazK. (1995). The body, identity, and self: Adapting to impairment. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 657–680.
13.
CorriganP. W.WatsonA. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 35–53.
14.
DiazW. A. (1996). Latino participation in America: Association and political roles. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 154–174.
15.
FernándezS.BranscombeN. R.GómezÁ.MoralesJ. F. (2012). Influence of the social context on use of surgical-lengthening and group-empowering coping strategies among people with dwarfism. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57, 224–235.
16.
FosseN.GraheJ. E.ReifmanA. (2015). Markers of adulthood subscales. Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions (EAMMI). Retrieved from Open Science Framework, http://osf.io/yjdaf
17.
FosseN.ToyokawaT. (2016). Inter institutional variation in emerging adulthood among undergraduate students: The role of school selectivity. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 142–152.
18.
GalambosN. L.DarrahJ.Magill-EvansJ. (2007). Subjective age in the transition to adulthood for persons with and without motor disabilities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 825–834.
19.
GarstkaT. A.SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.HummertM. L. (2004). How young and older adults differ in their responses to perceived age discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 19, 326–335.
20.
GraheJ. E.ReifmanA.WalkerM.OlesonK. C. (2015). EAMMI_ConstructDescriptions. Emerging Adulthood Measured at Multiple Institutions (EAMMI). Retrieved from Open Science Framework, http://osf.io/yjdaf
21.
HahnH. D.BeltT. L. (2004). Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activists. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 453–464.
22.
HayesA. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
KaplanH. B.LiuX. (2000). Social movements as collective coping with spoiled personal identities: Intimations from a panel study of changes in the life course between adolescence and adulthood. In StrykerS.OwensT. J.WhiteR. W. (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 215–238). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
LiL.MooreD. (1998). Acceptance of disability and its correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 13–25.
25.
LindlyO.Nario-RedmondM. R.NoelJ. G. (2014). Creatively re-defining fat: Identification predicts strategic responses to stigma, ingroup attitudes, and well-being. Fat Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society, 3, 179–195.
26.
LindstromL.KahnL. G.LindseyH. (2013). Navigating the early career years: Barriers and strategies for young adults with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 39, 1–12. doi:10.3233/JVR-130637
27.
LintonS. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
LuhtanenR. K. (2003). Identity, stigma management and well-being: A comparison of lesbians/bisexual women and gay//bisexual men. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7, 85–100.
30.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
31.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–339). San Diego, CA: Academic.
32.
MossakowskiK. N. (2003). Coping with perceived discrimination: Does ethnic identity protect mental health?Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 44, 318–331.
33.
MyersJ. (2012). Hooked up. A new generation’s surprising take on sex, politics and saving the world. Stanford, CT: York House Press.
34.
Nario-RedmondM. R. (2010). Cultural stereotypes of disabled and nondisabled men and women: Consensus for global category representations and diagnostic domains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 471–488.
35.
Nario-RedmondM. R.NoelJ. G.FernE. (2013). Redefining disability, reimagining the self: Disability identification predicts self-esteem and strategic responses to stigma. Self and Identity, 12, 468–488. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.681118
36.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA. M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) 2011–3005. Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524044.pdf
37.
OlneyM. F.BrockelmanK. F. (2003). Out of the disability closet: Strategic use of perception management by select university students with disabilities. Disability and Society, 18, 35–50.
38.
OuttenH. R.SchmittM. T.GarciaD. M.BranscombeN. R. (2009). Coping options: Missing links between minority group identification and psychological well-being. Applied Psychology, 58, 146–170.
39.
Pew Research Center. (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
PutnamM. (2005). Conceptualizing disability: Developing a framework for political disability identity. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 116, 188–198.
41.
ReifmanA.ArnettJ. J.ColwellM. J. (2007, Summer). Emerging adulthood: Theory, assessment, and application. Journal of Youth Development, 2(1).
42.
ReifmanA.GraheJ. E. (2016). Introduction to the special issue of Emerging Adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 135–141.
43.
RosenstoneS.HansenJ. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York, NY: Macmillan.
44.
SchrinerK.OchsL.ShieldsT. (1997). The last suffrage movement: Voting rights for people with cognitive and emotional disabilities. Publius, 27, 75–96.
45.
SchulenbergJ. E.ZarrettN. R. (2006). Mental health during emerging adulthood: Continuity and discontinuity in courses, causes, and functions. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 135–172). Washington, DC: APA Books.
46.
SchurL.ShieldsT. G.KruseD. L.SchrinerK. (2002). Enabling democracy: Disability and voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 167–190.
47.
SchurL.ShieldsT. G.SchrinerK. (2005). Generational cohorts, group membership, and political participation by people with disabilities. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 487–496.
48.
ShapiroJ.1994. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Times Books.
49.
SternS. E.MullennixJ. W.FortierA. D.SteinhauserE. (2010). Stereotypes of people with physical disabilities and speech impairments as detected by partially structured attitude measures. Computer Synthesized Speech Technologies: Tools for Aiding Impairment, 219. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-725-1.ch014
50.
StewartD.FreemanM.LawM.HealyH.Burke-GaffneyJ.ForhanM.…GuentherS. (2010). Transition to adulthood for youth with disabilities: Evidence from the literature. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation. Retrieved fromhttp://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/article.php?id=110&language=en
51.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
52.
TateK. (1993). From protest to politics: The new Black voters in American elections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
Van NaardenB. K.Yeargin-AllsoppM.LollarD. (2006). A multi-dimensional approach to the transition of children with developmental disabilities into young adulthood: The acquisition of adult social roles. Disability & Rehabilitation, 28, 915–928.
54.
WalkerM.IversonE. (2016). Identity development and political self-regulation in emerging adult political attitudes and behavior. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 153–160.
55.
WittenburgD. C.MaagE. (2002). School to where? A literature review on economic outcomes of youth with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 265–280.
