The majority of cyberbullying studies have examined middle and high school students. The purpose of the present study was to develop a multifactor cyberbullying victimization and perpetration survey for use with an emerging adult population. The initial 88-item preliminary survey (44 victimization and 44 perpetration items) was administered to 538 college students (421 females). Exploratory factor analyses revealed four-factor (i.e., malice, public humiliation, unwanted contact, and deception) victimization and perpetration scales. A confirmatory factor analysis was then performed on the Cyberbullying Experiences Survey (CES) factor structure with a separate sample of 638 college students (446 females). Results indicated a final 21-item victimization scale and 20-item perpetration scale consisting of the same four factors. The CES has adequate internal consistency and convergent validity with other measures of cyberbullying and Internet harassment and may provide a promising multifactor method of measuring cyberbullying victimization and perpetration.
AngR. P.GohD. H. (2009). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 387–397. doi:10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3
2.
AricakO. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 34, 167–184.
3.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. Mplus Technical Appendices. Retrieved fromwww.statmodel.com
4.
AustinS.JosephS. (1996). Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 447–456. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01211.x
5.
BaumanS. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study, The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 803–833. doi:10.1177/0272431609350927
6.
BaumanS. (2011). Cyberbullying: What counselors need to know. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
7.
BrownT. A.MooreM. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 361–379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
CalveteE.OrueI.EstévezI.VillardónL.PadillaP. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128–1135. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
10.
ClevelandM. J.LanzaS. T.RayA. E.TurrisiR.MallettK. A. (2012). Transitions in first-year college student drinking behaviors: Does pre- college drinking moderate the effects of parent- and peer-based intervention components?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 440–450. doi:10.1037/a0026130
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
ConyneR. K. (2010). Prevention program development and evaluation: An incidence reduction, culturally relevant approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358
15.
DawsonD. A.GrantB. F.StinsonF. S.ChouP. S. (2004). Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorders among college and noncollege youth. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 477–488.
16.
DenmarkF. L.KlaraM. D.BaronE. M. (2008). Bullying and hazing: A form of campus harassment. In PaludiM. A. (Ed.), Understanding and preventing campus violence (pp. 27–40). Westport, CO: Praeger.
17.
DilmaçD. (2009). Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: A preliminary report on college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9, 1307–1325.
18.
DoaneA. N.KelleyM. L.CornellA. M. (2009, April). Online bullies: College students’ reports of internet harassment and cyberbullying. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Denver, CO.
19.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. (1998). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
20.
FantiK. A.DemetriouA. G.HawaV. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 168–181. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
21.
FinnJ. (2004). A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 468–483. doi:10.1177/0886260503262083
22.
FischerD. G.FickC. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 417–424. doi:10.1177/0013164493053002011
23.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics.
24.
GorsuchL. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
GradingerP.StrohmeierD.SpielC. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Journal of Psychology, 217, 205–213. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205
26.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206–221. doi:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
28.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
29.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162
30.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
LiQ. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1777–1791. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005
33.
LiQ.FungT. (2012). Predicting student behaviors: Cyberbullies, cybervictims, and bystanders. In LiQ.CrossD.SmithP. K. (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 99–114). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
MenesiniE.NocentiniA.CalussiP. (2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 267–274. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0002
35.
MuthénB. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132. doi:10.1007/BF02294210
36.
MuthénB. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other non-normal variables. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 205–243). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
MuthénB.SatorraA. (1995). Technical aspects of Muthén’s LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika, 60, 489–503. doi:10.1007/BF02294325
38.
NanselT. R.OverpeckM.PillaR. S.RuanW. J.Simons-MortonB.ScheidtP. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. doi:10.1001/jama.285.16.2094
39.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
OlweusD. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In PeplerD. J.RubinK. H. (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
OlweusD. (2003). A profile of bullying at school. Educational Leadership, 60, 12–17.
42.
PadillaM. A.DiversJ.NewtonM. (2012). Coefficient alpha bootstrap confidence interval under non normality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 331–348. doi:10.1177/0146621612445470
43.
RiversI.NoretN. (2010). ‘I h8 u’: Findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 643–671. doi:10.1080/01411920903071918
44.
ŠevčíkováA.ŠmahelD. (2009). Online harassment and cyberbullying in the Czech Republic: Comparison across age groups. Journal of Psychology, 217, 227–229. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.227
45.
SlonjeR.SmithP. K.FrisénA. (2012). Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 244–259. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643670
46.
SlonjeR.SmithP. K.FrisénA. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
47.
SmithP. K. (2011). Bullying in schools: Thirty years of research. In MonksC. P.CoyneI. (Eds.), Bullying in different contexts (pp. 36–60). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SmithP. K. (2012). Cyberbullying: Challenges and opportunities for a research program—A response to Olweus (2012). European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 553–558. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.689821
49.
StrahanR.GerbasiK. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191:AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G
50.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
51.
VandeboschH.Van CleemputK. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349–1371. doi:10.1177/1461444809341263
52.
WalkerC. M.SockmanB. R.KoehnS. (2011). An exploratory study of cyberbullying with undergraduate university students. TechTrends, 55, 31–38. doi:10.1007/s11528-011-0481-0
53.
WaltzC. F.StricklandO. L.LenzE. R. (2004). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
54.
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55.
WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of Internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S14–S21. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018
56.
WolakJ.MitchellK. J.FinkelhorD. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S51–S58. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.019
57.
YanZ. (2009). Differences in high school and college students’ basic knowledge and perceived education of Internet safety: Do high school students really benefit from the Children’s Internet Protection Act?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 209–217. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.007
58.
YbarraM. L.Diener-WestM.LeafP. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42–S50. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004
