Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing upon the dialogic theory, this study examines how English Premier League (EPL) clubs navigate dialogic communication principles on X (formerly Twitter) amid profound economic stratification. Through a quantitative content analysis of 7,105 posts from all 20 EPL clubs during the 2023–2024 season, we reveal how resource disparities between Big Six and non-Big Six clubs reshape relational strategies while uncovering a critical engagement paradox. Results demonstrate that Big Six clubs’ superior implementation of dialogic loops, information usefulness, return visits, and visitor retention, validating resource dependency theory. Counterintuitively, prescribed dialogic tactics, including soliciting input, call-to-action, hashtag/mention engagement, and cross-promotion, consistently suppressed engagement metrics (replies, reposts, likes). Player-centric content emerged as the strongest universal engagement driver, while corporate messaging reduced audience connection. The chasm in engagement volume between club tiers transcended content strategy, reflecting structural advantages in global reach and algorithmic privilege. These findings challenge dialogic theory’s core assumption that interactivity inherently fosters relational depth, revealing instead that platform-native fandom prioritizes consumptive authenticity over manufactured dialogue. Theoretical and practical implications of this study were also discussed.

Keywords

dialogic communication economic stratification English Premier League fan engagement professional sports social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abeza

(2023). Social media and sport studies (2014-2023): A critical review. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0182

Anagnostopoulos

Parganas

Chadwick

Fenton

(2018). Branding in pictures: Using Instagram as a brand management tool in professional team sport organisations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(4), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2017.1410202

Annamalai

Yoshida

Varshney

Pathak

A. A.

Venugopal

(2021). Social media content strategy for sport clubs to drive fan engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, Article 102648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102648

Bonsón

Ratkai

(2013). A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review, 37(5), 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2012-0054

Bortree

D. S.

Seltzer

(2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002

Botan

(1997). Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations. Journal of Business Communication, 34(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369703400205

Bridge

Sajdeh

(2025). Deloitte football money league 2025. Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/uk/en/services/financial-advisory/analysis/deloitte-football-money-league.html

Bruns

Stieglitz

(2014). Metrics for understanding communication on Twitter. In Weller

Bruns

Burgess

Mahrt

Puschmann

(Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 69–82). Peter Lang.

Buber

(1992). On intersubjectivity and cultural creativity. University of Chicago Press.

10.

Carreras

Garcia

(2018). TV rights, financial inequality, and competitive balance in European football: Evidence from the English premier league and the Spanish LaLiga. International Journal of Sport Finance, 13(3), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862351801300301. https://fitpublishing.com/articles/tv-rights-financial-inequality-and-competitive-balance-european-football-evidence-english

11.

Chen

Z. F.

Y. G.

Men

L. R.

(2023). Effective social media communication for startups in China: Antecedents and outcomes of organization-public dialogic communication. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3613–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211051984

12.

Clavio

Kian

T. M.

(2010). Uses and gratifications of a retired female athlete’s Twitter followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.3.4.485

13.

Driscoll

Walker

(2014). Working within a Black box: Transparency in the collection and production of big Twitter data. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1745–1764. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2171.

14.

Duncombe

(2019). The politics of Twitter: Emotions and the power of social media. International Political Sociology, 13(4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz013

15.

Filo

Lock

Karg

(2015). Sport and social media research: A review. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.11.001

16.

Gibbs

O’Reilly

Brunette

(2014). Professional team sport and Twitter: Gratifications sought and obtained by followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJSC.2014-0005

17.

Grunig

J. E.

(2001). Two-way symmetrical public relations: Past, present, and future. In Heath

R. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 11–30). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220727.n1

18.

Pratt

(2000). The real state of public relations on the world wide web. Public Relations Strategist, 6(3), 30–33.

19.

Hallgren

K. A.

(2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023

20.

Hambrick

M. E.

Simmons

J. M.

Greenhalgh

G. P.

Greenwell

T. C.

(2010). Understanding professional athletes’ use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.3.4.454

21.

Heath

R. L.

Pearce

W. B.

Shotter

Taylor

J. R.

Kersten

Zorn

Roper

Motion

Deetz

(2006). The processes of dialogue: Participation and legitimation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 341–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905282208

22.

Hester

J. B.

Dougall

(2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400410

23.

Hjellbrekke

(2018). Multiple correspondence analysis for the social sciences. Routledge.

24.

Karg

Funk

(2020). Strategic sport marketing. Routledge.

25.

Kelleher

(2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01410.x

26.

Kemp

(2025). Summer transfer window 2025: Who spends and who sells the most. Sportingpedia. https://www.sportingpedia.com/2025/07/24/summer-transfer-window-2025-who-spends-and-who-sells-the-most/

27.

Kent

M. L.

Lane

A. B.

(2017). A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.017

28.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X

29.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

(2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X

30.

Kent

M. L.

Taylor

White

W. J.

(2003). The relationship between web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00194-7

31.

Kent

M. L.

Theunissen

(2016). Elegy for mediated dialogue: Shiva the destroyer and reclaiming our first principles. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4040–4054. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4571

32.

Kidd

(2019). The big 6 clubs are ‘destroying the Premier League,’ report says. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertkidd/2019/06/18/the-big-6-clubs-are-destroying-the-premier-league-says-report/

33.

Kim

Yang

S. U.

(2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006

34.

Lacy

Watson

B. R.

Riffe

Lovejoy

(2015). Issues and best practices in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015607338

35.

Lim

Y. S.

Lee-Won

R. J.

(2017). When retweets persuade: The persuasive effects of dialogic retweeting and the role of social presence in organizations’ Twitter-based communication. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.003

36.

Linvill

D. L.

McGee

S. E.

Hicks

L. K.

(2012). Colleges’ and universities’ use of Twitter: A content analysis. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.010

37.

Liu

W. W.

Tsai

J. Y. J.

(2020). Developing a multi-level organization-public dialogic communication framework to assess social media-mediated disaster communication and engagement outcomes. Public Relations Review, 46(4), Article 101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101949

38.

Lovejoy

Waters

R. D.

Saxton

G. D.

(2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005

39.

Ludvigsen

J. A. L.

(2020). The premier League-globalization nexus: Notes on current trends, pressing issues and inter-linked “-ization” processes. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(1-2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2019.1657784

40.

McHugh

M. L.

(2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

41.

Men

L. R.

Tsai

W. H. S.

Chen

Z. F.

Y. G.

(2018). Social presence and digital dialogic communication: Engagement lessons from top social CEOs. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498341

42.

Millward

(2011). The global football league: Transnational networks, social movements and sport in the new media age. Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

Morehouse

Saffer

A. J.

(2018). A bibliometric analysis of dialogue and digital dialogic research: Mapping the knowledge construction and invisible colleges in public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498343

44.

O’Neil

Schieffer

(2014). An examination of fortune 500 companies’ and philanthropy 200 nonprofit organizations’ relationship cultivation strategies on Facebook. Public Relations Journal, 8(1), 1–27. https://www.prsa.org/intelligence/prjournal/documents/201402julieoneil.pdf

45.

Pettigrew

J. E.

Reber

B. H.

(2010). The new dynamic in corporate media relations: How fortune 500 companies are using virtual press rooms to engage the press. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003801412

46.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.

47.

Riffe

Lacy

Watson

B. R.

Lovejoy

(2023). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (5th ed.). Routledge.

48.

Ryan

(2003). Public relations and the web: Organizational problems, gender, and institution type. Public Relations Review, 29(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(03)00040-7

49.

Rybalko

Seltzer

(2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004

50.

Saffer

A. J.

Sommerfeldt

E. J.

Taylor

(2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization-public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 213–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.005

51.

Sloan

Quan-Haase

(2022). The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.

52.

Sommerfeldt

E. J.

Yang

(2018). Notes on a dialogue: Twenty years of digital dialogic communication research in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498248

53.

Soon

Soh

Y. D.

(2014). Engagement@web 2.0 between the government and citizens in Singapore: Dialogic communication on Facebook? Asian Journal of Communication, 24(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.851722

54.

Sundstrom

Levenshus

A. B.

(2017). The art of engagement: Dialogic strategies on Twitter. Journal of Communication Management, 21(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2015-0057

55.

Taylor

Kent

M. L.

(2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106

56.

Taylor

Kent

M. L.

White

W. J.

(2001). How activist organizations are using the internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8

57.

Uysal

(2018). On the relationship between dialogic communication and corporate social performance: Advancing dialogic theory and research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498344

58.

Wang

Yang

(2020). Dialogic communication on social media: How organizations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, Article 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183

59.

Wang

Zhou

(2015). How do sports organizations use social media to build relationships? A content analysis of NBA clubs’ Twitter use. International Journal of Sport Communication, 8(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2014-0083

60.

Watkins

Lewis

(2014). Initiating dialogue on social media: An investigation of athletes’ use of dialogic principles and structural features of Twitter. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 853–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.08.001

61.

Watkins

B. A.

(2017). Experimenting with dialogue on Twitter: An examination of the influence of the dialogic principles on engagement, interaction, and attitude. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.002

62.

Wirtz

J. G.

Zimbres

T. M.

(2018). A systematic analysis of research applying ‘principles of dialogic communication’ to organizational websites, blogs, and social media: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(1-2), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455146

63.

Yang

S. U.

Kang

Cha

(2015). A study on dialogic communication, trust, and distrust: Testing a scale for measuring organization-public dialogic communication (OPDC). Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2015.1007998

When Dialogue Backfires: Economic Stratification and Engagement Paradoxes in English Premier League Clubs’ Dialogic Communication on X

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References