In response to Cummins & Hahn’s (2025) meta-analysis of the first 10 vol of Communication & Sport, this article advocates for greater methodology breadth in communication and sport research. It emphasizes the need to incorporate diverse data sources, experimental and longitudinal designs, and technology-enabled research methods. The article calls for increased methodological innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and support for publishing research that expands methodological boundaries, aiming to spark scholarly dialogue and strengthen our research community.
AndersonB. (2005). The value of mixed-method longitudinal panel studies in ICT research: Transitions in and out of ICT poverty as a case in point. Information, Communication & Society, 8(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500259160
2.
BoatwrightB. C. (2025). Embracing computational approaches to social media research: Implications for theory and praxis in sport communication. Communication & Sport, 13(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231196429
3.
CharnessG.GneezyU.KuhnM. A. (2013). Experimental methods: Extra-laboratory experiments – extending the reach of experimental economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.002
4.
CumminsR. G.HahnD. (2022). Selective exposure and exemplification within sports highlights. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.2008938
5.
CumminsR. G.HahnD. (2025). 10 years of Communication & Sport: A review of theory, method, and authorship. Communication & Sport, 13(5), 881–903.
6.
DavidsonN. P.DuJ.GiardinaM. D. (2020). Through the perilous fight: A case analysis of professional wrestling during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(3), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0224
7.
DuJ.MamoY. Z.FloydC.KarthikeyanN.JamesJ. D. (2024). Machine learning in sport social media research: Practical uses and opportunities. International Journal of Sport Communication, 17(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0151
8.
GneezyA. (2017). Field experimentation in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(1), 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.16.0225
9.
GongH.WatanabeN. M.SoebbingB. P.BrownM. T.NagelM. S. (2021). Do consumer perceptions of tanking impact attendance at national basketball association games? A sentiment analysis approach. Journal of Sport Management, 35(3), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2020-0274
10.
HuibertsE. (2016). Building bridges, filling gaps: Toward an integrative interdisciplinary and mixed-methods approach for future audience research in relation to the mediation of distant suffering. International Journal of Communication, 10(1), 4324–4344.
11.
KoY. J.KwakD. H.JangE. W.LeeJ. S.AsadaA.ChangY.KimD.PradhanS.YilmazS. (2023). Using experiments in sport consumer behavior research: A review and directions for future research. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 32(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.32731/SMQ.321.032023.03
12.
KwonY.-S.LeeS.-E. (2018). Cognitive processing of sound effects in television sports broadcasting. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 27(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2018.1541899
13.
MamoY. (2023). Big data and innovative research methods. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(3), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0109
14.
MyllylahtiM. (2020). Paying attention to attention: A conceptual framework for studying news reader revenue models related to platforms. Digital Journalism, 8(5), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691926
15.
RazaS.DingC. (2021). News recommender system: A review of recent progress, challenges, and opportunities. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(1), 749–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10043-x
16.
RuddA.JohnsonR. B. (2010). A call for more mixed methods in sport management research. Sport Management Review, 13(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.106/j.smr.2009.06.004
17.
SandersonJ. (2023). Critiquing the social media scholarship in sport studies: Looking beyond content and adopting critical approaches. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(3), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0178
18.
SrinivasanP.Oeldrof-HirschA.JoergensenG. (2022). “Attention! It’s the news.” Cognitive load and news posts on facebook: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Communication Technology, 5(3), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.51548/joctec-2022-012
19.
TangT.MahoneyL. M. (2025). Methodological approaches in sport and social media research. In BillingsA. C.HardinM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport & social media: Routledge.
WoodS. (2024). The future of consumer research methods: Lessons of a prospective retrospective. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(1), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae017
