The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of media type (2D vs. VR) and signage location (center vs. periphery) on the cognitive processing of signage advertising during sporting events. The rapid growth of the virtual reality (VR) sports market has led to widespread integration of sports content into virtual reality services. Despite this, academic exploration of such services remains in its early stages. Using the framework of the dynamic human-centered communication systems theory (DHCCST), this research examines the effects of media type (2D vs. VR) and signage advertising location (center vs. periphery) on cognitive processing of advertising during sporting events. In an experiment, participants viewed a sports game in either 2D or VR format. Real-time biometric measures assessed attentional resources and visual attention, while memory tests evaluated brand memory performance. VR, compared to 2-D, sports viewing trended toward eliciting greater cognitive resource allocation during the periods when signage advertising was presented during the game but significantly decreased visual attention and impaired brand memory for ads. Further, advertising placed centrally received better visual attention and facilitated brand memory compared to advertising in the periphery, regardless of media type. The interaction effect between media type and signage location on attentional outcomes was minimal. Results are discussed in light of the DHCCST and to offer practical insights for designing content to enhance sponsor effectiveness in VR sports programming.
BaileyR. L.HanJ.ReadG. L.(in press). Dynamic systems approaches to media psychology research. In BaileyR. L.ReadG. L. (Eds.). DeGruyter handbook of media psychology. DeGruyter.
3.
BollsP. D.LangA.PotterR. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005003
4.
BreuerC.RumpfC.BoronczykF. (2021). Sponsor message processing in live broadcasts—a pilot study on the role of game outcome uncertainty and emotions. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21481
5.
ChangY.WarrenC.LeeT. (2024). Virtual reality technology induced flow in the spectator sports context: Empirical examinations of VR flow, its unique antecedents, and consequences. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 33(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.32731/smq.331.032024.06
6.
ChungS.SparksJ. V. (2016). Motivated processing of peripheral advertising information in video games. Communication Research, 43(4), 518–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214566623
Dos SantosM.Calabuig MorenoF.Crespo-HervásJ. (2019). Influence of perceived and effective congruence on recall and purchase intention in sponsored printed sports advertising: An eye-tracking application. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-10-2018-0099
9.
DuarteE.RebeloF.TelesJ.WogalterM. S. (2014). Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment. Applied Ergonomics, 45(5), 1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.004
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
11.
FoxJ. R. (2004). A signal detection analysis of audio/video redundancy effects in television news video. Communication Research, 31(5), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204267931
12.
HeroldE.BreuerC. (2023). Does the game matter? Analyzing sponsorship effectiveness and message personalization in sport live broadcasts. Journal of Sport Management, 37(4), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0206
13.
HuX.XuL. (2023). How guidance signage design influences passengers’ wayfinding performance in metro stations: Case study of a virtual reality experiment. Transportation Research Record, 2677(1), 1118–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221103591
14.
KangD.KwonJ.NamS. (2023). Research on effective advertising types in virtual environment. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7063. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127063
15.
KelsoJ. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press.
16.
KimD.KoY. J. (2019). The impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on sport spectators’ flow experience and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.040
17.
KimJ. (2017). Understanding, current status, and suggestions for eye-tracking methodology in visual perception research on advertising. Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 19(2), 41–84. https://doi.org/10.16914/kjapr.2017.19.2.41
18.
KimN.LeeH. (2021). Assessing consumer attention and arousal using eye-tracking technology in virtual retail environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 665658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665658
19.
KingA. J.BolN.CumminsR. G.JohnK. K. (2019). Improving visual behavior research in communication science: An overview, review, and reporting recommendations for using eye-tracking methods. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(3), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1558194
LangA. (2006a). Motivated cognition (LC4MP): The influence of appetitive and aversive activation on processing of video games. In MessarisP.HumphreysL. (Eds.), Digital media: Transformations in human communication (pp. 237–256). Peter Lang.
22.
LangA. (2006b). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing (LC4MP) to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
LangA. (2020). How the LC4MP became the DHCCST: An epistemological fairy tale. In FloydK.WeberR. (Eds.), The handbook of communication science and biology (pp. 397–408). Routledge.
25.
LangA.BaileyR. L. (2015). Understanding information selection and encoding from a dynamic, energy saving, evolved, embodied, embedded perspective. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12040
26.
LeeM.PotterR. F.PedersenP. M. (2019). The effects of emotions on cognitive effort while processing mediated stadium-embedded advertising: A dynamic motivational systems approach. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(5), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1562483
27.
LeeM.ZhouX. (2023). Real-time psychophysiological approaches to explore emotional and cognitive processing of VR-mediated sports. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-03-2023-0042
28.
MacmillanN.CreelmanD. (1991). Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MoormanM.NeijensP. C.SmitE. G. (2007). The effects of program involvement on commercial exposure and recall in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360109
30.
NarinN. G. (2021). A content analysis of the metaverse articles. Journal of Metaverse, 1(1), 17–24.
31.
OboudiB.ElahiA.Akbari YazdiH.PyunD. Y. (2023). Impacts of game attractiveness and color of message on sport viewers' attention to prosocial message: An eye-tracking study. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-11-2021-0143
32.
OrquinJ. L.HolmqvistK. (2018). Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1645–1656. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z
33.
PastelS.MarlokJ.BandowN.WitteK. (2022). Application of eye-tracking systems integrated into immersive virtual reality and possible transfer to the sports sector-A systematic review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 4181–4208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13474-y
34.
PotterR. F.KeeneJ. R. (2012). The effect of sports fan identification on the cognitive processing of sports news. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.5.3.348
35.
RoettlJ.TerlutterR. (2018). The same video game in 2D, 3D or virtual reality – how does technology impact game evaluation and brand placements?PLoS One, 13(7), Article e0200724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200724
36.
SchöneB.WesselsM.GruberT. (2019). Experiences in virtual reality: A window to autobiographical memory. Current Psychology, 38(3), 715–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9648-y
37.
SunS.KangJ.ShenB. (2024). Emerging media: A transdisciplinary synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 48(4), 2851–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2024.2348477
38.
TohB.LengH. K.PhuaY. X. P. (2023). Effect of colours on sponsor recall. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(4), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-12-2021-0905
39.
UhmJ. P.LeeH. W.HanJ. W. (2020). Creating sense of presence in a virtual reality experience: Impact on neurophysiological arousal and attitude towards a winter sport. Sport Management Review, 23(4), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.10.003
40.
VashishtD.RoyneM. B. (2016). Advergame speed influence and brand recall: The moderating effects of brand placement strength and gamers’ persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.022
41.
WangZ.LangA. (2012). Reconceptualizing excitation transfer as motivational activation changes and a test of the television program context effects. Media Psychology, 15(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.649604
YegiyanN. S.LangA. (2010). Processing central and peripheral detail: How content arousal and emotional tone influence encoding. Media Psychology, 13(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903563014
44.
YimM. Y. C.AbdourazakouY.SauerP. kimL.ParkS. Y. (2018). Modelling the dimensionality effects on brand placement effectiveness in stereoscopic 3-D versus 2-D sports games. International Journal of Advertising, 37(6), 958–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1347366
45.
ZaichkowskyJ. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352. https://www.jstor.org/stable/254378
