AbezaG.O’ReillyN.SéguinB.NzindukiyimanaO. (2015). Social media scholarship in sport management research: A critical review. Journal of Sport Management, 29(6), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2014-0296
2.
AbezaG.SandersonJ. (2022). Theory and social media in sport studies. International Journal of Sport Communication, 15(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2022-0108
BalahurA.JacquetG. (2015). Sentiment analysis meets social media–Challenges and solutions of the field in view of the current information sharing context. Information Processing and Management, 51(4), 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.05.005
6.
BatrincaB.TreleavenP. C. (2015). Social media analytics: A survey of techniques, tools and platforms. Ai and Society, 30(1), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0549-4
7.
BigsbyK. G.OhlmannJ. W.ZhaoK. (2017). Online and off the field: Predicting school choice in college football recruiting from social media data. Decision Analysis, 14(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2017.0353
8.
BigsbyK. G.OhlmannJ. W.ZhaoK. (2019). Keeping it 100: Social media and self-presentation in college football recruiting. Big Data, 7(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2018.0094
BoatwrightB. C.FrebergK. (2022). Social media and sport marketing in North America. In NaraineM. L.HaydukT.DoyleJ. P. (Eds), The routledge handbook of digital sport media (pp. 206–216). Routledge.
11.
BoukesM.Van de VeldeB.AraujoT.VliegenthartR. (2020). What’s the tone? Easy doesn’t do it: Analyzing performance and agreement between off-the-shelf sentiment analysis tools. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(2), 83–104.
12.
boydd.CrawfordK. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication and society, 15(5), 662–679.
13.
boydd.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
14.
BrownK. A.BillingsA. C.MurphyB.PuesanL. (2018). Intersections of fandom in the age of interactive media: eSports fandom as a predictor of traditional sport fandom. Communication & Sport, 6(4), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479517727286
15.
BucurA.-M.PodinaI.R.DinuL.P. (2021). A psychologically informed part-of-speech analysis of depression in social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing(RANLP2021), pages 199–207.
16.
CaiL.ZhuY. (2015). The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002
ChowdhuryG. G. (2003). Natural language processing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370103
19.
ChungT. L. D.JohnsonO.Hall-PhillipsA.KimK. (2021). The effects of offline events on online connective actions: An examination of# BoycottNFL using social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106623
20.
ColomboG.BounegruL.GrayJ. (2023). Visual models for social media image analysis: Groupings, engagement, trends, and rankings. International Journal of Communication, 17, 1956–1983.
21.
CranmerG. A.PeltzS.BoatwrightB. C.SandersonJ.ScheinbaumA. (2023). Athletes’ displaced dissent on social media: Triggering agents, message strategies, and user-generated responses. Communication Quarterly, 71(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2203828
22.
FalavarjaniS.A.M.ZarrinkalamF.JovanovicJ.BagheriE.GhorbaniA.A. (2019). The reflection of offline activities on users’ online social behavior: An observational study. Information Processing & Management, 56(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102070
FrederickE. L.PegoraroA.SchmidtS. (2022). I’m not going to the f*** ing White House”: Twitter users react to Donald Trump and Megan Rapinoe. Communication & Sport, 10(6), 1210–1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479520950778
25.
GongX.WangY. (2021). Exploring dynamics of sports fan behavior using social media big data-A case study of the 2019 National Basketball Association Finals. Applied Geography, 129, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102438
HambrickM. E.PegoraroA. (2014). Social Sochi: Using social network analysis to investigate electronic word-of-mouth transmitted through social media communities. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 15(3-4), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2014.072005
28.
HambrickM. E.SandersonJ. (2013). Gaining primacy in the digital network: Using social network analysis to examine sports journalists' coverage of the Penn State football scandal via Twitter. Journal of Sports Media, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsm.2013.0003
29.
HardinM. (2014). Moving beyond description: Putting Twitter in (theoretical) context. Communication & Sport, 2(2), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479514527425
30.
HardinM.BillingsA. C. (2023). Much ado about twitter, twitch, and more: A maturing research agenda. Communication & Sport, 11(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231152657
31.
HarkerJ. L. (2021). # JoinTheAlliance: A network exploration into hashtag brand building by an emerging sports league. Journal of Sports Media, 16(1), 71–97.
32.
HaydukT.NewlandB. (2020). Signalling Expertise in Sport Entrepreneurship: A Mixed-Methods Approach Using Topic Modeling and Thematic Analysis. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 12(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.7290/jasm120102
33.
HayesJ. L.BrittB. C.EvansW.RushS. W.ToweryN. A.AdamsonA. C. (2021). Can social media listening platforms’ artificial intelligence be trusted? Examining the accuracy of crimson hexagon’s (now Brandwatch Consumer research’s) AI-driven analyses. Journal of Advertising, 50(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1809576
34.
HidayatullahA. F.PembraniE. C.KurniawanW.AkbarG.PranataR. (2018, April). Twitter topic modeling on football news. In 20183rd International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS) (pp. 467-471). IEEE.
35.
HimelboimI. (2017). Social network analysis (Social media). In MatthesJ.DavisC. S.PotterR. F. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–15). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0236
36.
HimelboimI.SweetserK. D.TinkhamS. F.CameronK.DaneloM.WestK. (2016). Valence-based homophily on Twitter: Network analysis of emotions and political talk in the 2012 presidential election. New Media and Society, 18(7), 1382–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814555096
37.
HofmanJ.WattsD. J.AtheyS.GaripF.GriffithsT. L.KleinbergJ.MargettsH.MullainathanS.SalganikM. J.VazireS.VespignanA.YarkoniT. (2021). Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature, 595, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0
JüngerJ.GeiseS.HäneltM. (2022). Unboxing Computational social media research from a datahermeneutical perspective: How do scholars address the tension between automation and interpretation?International Journal of Communication, 16, 1482–1505.
40.
KalampokisE.TambourisE.TarabanisK. (2013). Understanding the predictive power of social media. Internet Research.
41.
KellingS.FinkD.La SorteF. A.JohnstonA.BrunsN. E.HochachkaW. M. (2015). Taking a ‘Big Data’approach to data quality in a citizen science project. Ambio, 44(4), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4
42.
KellingS.HochachkaW.FinkD.RiedewaldM.CaruanaR.BallardG.HookerG. (2009). Data-intensive Science: A New Paradigm for Biodiversity Studies. BioScience, 59(7), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12
43.
KennedyH.KunkelT.FunkD. C. (2021). Using predictive analytics to measure effectiveness of social media engagement: A digital measurement perspective. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 30(4), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.32731/smq.304.1221.02
44.
KimM.OhS. W.HanJ. W. (2020). Social big data analysis on demands for the Korean sport industry. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 32(2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.24985/ijass.2020.32.2.28
KumbleS.DiddiP.Bien-AiméS. (2022). ‘Your Strength Is Inspirational’: How Naomi Osaka’s Twitter Announcement Destigmatizes Mental Health Disclosures. Communication & Sport. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221124584
LazerD. M.PentlandA.WattsD. J.AralS.AtheyS.ContractorN.WagnerC. (2020). Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities. Science, 369(6507), 1060–1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8170
51.
LiC.KentM. L. (2021). Explorations on mediated communication and beyond: Toward a theory of social media. Public Relations Review, 47(5), 102112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102112
52.
LiuP.KoivistoS.HiippalaT.van der LijnC.VaisanenT.NurmiM.MuukkonenP. (2022). Extracting locations from sport and exercise-related social media messages using a neural network-based bilingual toponym recognition model. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 24, 31–61. https://doi.org/10.5311/josis.2022.24.167
53.
LucasG. M.GratchJ.MalandrakisN.SzablowskiE.FesslerE.NicholsJ. (2017). GOAALLL!: Using sentiment in the world cup to explore theories of emotion. Image and Vision Computing, 65, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2017.01.006
54.
MargolinD. B. (2019). Computational contributions: A symbiotic approach to integrating big, observational data studies into the communication field. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639144
55.
MehtaP.PandyaS.KotechaK. (2021). Harvesting social media sentiment analysis to enhance stock market prediction using deep learning. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, Article e476. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.476
56.
MneimnehZ.PasekJ.SinghL.BestR.BodeL.BruchE.BudakC.Davis-KeanP.DonatoK.EllisonN.GelmanA.GroshenE.HemphillL.HobbsW.JensenJ. B.KarypisG.LaddJ. M.O’HaraA.RaghunathanT.…WojcikS. (2021, March 16). Data Acquisition, sampling, and data preparation considerations for quantitative social science research using social media data. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k6vyj
57.
MorganA.WilkV. (2022). Social media users’ crisis response: A lexical exploration of social media content in an international sport crisis. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102057
58.
MurrayA.KimD.CombsJ. (2022). The promise of a decentralized Internet: What is web 3.0 and HOW can firms prepare?Business Horizons, 66(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.06.002
59.
NaraineM. L.WanlessL. (2020). Going all in on AI: Examining the value proposition of and integration challenges with one branch of artificial intelligence in sport management. Sports Innovation Journal, 1, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.18060/23898
60.
PedersenP. M. (2014). A commentary on social media research from the perspective of a sport communication journal. Communication & Sport, 2(2), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479514527428
61.
PegoraroA. (2013). Sport fandom in the digital world. In Routledge handbook of sport communication (pp. 262–272). Routledge.
62.
PoppNDuJ.ShapiroS.L.SimmonsJ.M. (2023). Using Artificial Intelligence to Detect the Relationship Between Social Media Sentiment and Season Ticket Purchases. International Journal of Sport Communication, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0155
63.
RadosavljevicV.GrbovicM.DjuricN.BhamidipatiN. (2014). Large-scale World Cup 2014 outcome prediction based on Tumblr posts. In KDD workshop on large-scale sports analytics.
64.
RainsS. A. (2020). Big data, computational social science, and health communication: A review and agenda for advancing theory. Health Communication, 35(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1536955
65.
ReifurthK.BernthalM. J.BallouliK.CollinsD. (2019). Nonlocal fandom: Effects of geographic distance, geographic identity, and local Competition on team identification. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 28(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.32731/smq.284.122019.02
66.
RoderM.BothA.HinneburgA. (2015). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Websearch and Datamining, pp. 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684822.2685324
67.
RoweD. (2014). Following the followers: Sport researchers’ labour lost in the twittersphere?Communication & Sport, 2(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479514527431
68.
SegevE. (Ed), (2021). Semantic network analysis in social sciences. Routledge.
69.
ShahD. V.CappellaJ. N.NeumanW. R. (2015). Big data, digital media, and computational social science: Possibilities and perils. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215572084
70.
SulH. K.DennisA. R.YuanL. (2017). Trading on twitter: Using social media sentiment to predict stock returns. Decision Sciences, 48(3), 454–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12229
71.
ThelwallM. (2017). The Heart and Soul of the Web? Sentiment Strength Detection in the Social Web with SentiStrength. In Cyberemotions (pp. 119–134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43639-5_7
72.
TheocharisY.JungherrA. (2021). Computational social science and the study of political communication. Political Communication, 38(1-2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1833121
73.
TownsendL.WallaceC. (2017). The ethics of using social media data in research: A new framework. In The ethics of online research. Emerald Publishing Limited.
74.
van AtteveldtW.PengT.Q. (2018). When Communication Meets Computation: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pitfalls in Computational Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084
75.
van AtteveldtW.Van der VeldenBoukesM. (2021). The validity of sentiment analysis: Comparing manual annotation, crowd-coding, dictionary approaches, and machine learning algorithms. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(2), 121–140.
76.
WangG.ZhangZ.SunJ.YangS.LarsonC. A. (2015). POS-RS: A random subspace method for sentiment classification based on part-of-speech analysis. Information Processing and Management, 51(4), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.10.058
77.
WanlessL.NaraineM. L. (2023). Analogous forecasting for predicting sport innovation diffusion: From business analytics to natural language processing. Journal of Sport Management, 37(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0026
78.
WäscheH.DicksonG.WollA.BrandesU. (2017). Social network analysis in sport research: An emerging paradigm. European Journal for Sport and Society, 14(2), 138–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2017.1318198
79.
XiongY.ChoM.BoatwrightB. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the# MeToo movement. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-019-0786-4
80.
YangE. C. L.HayesM.ChenJ.RiotC.Khoo-LattimoreC. (2020). A social media analysis of the gendered representations of female and male athletes during the 2018 commonwealth games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(4), 670–695. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0045
81.
YooJ.J.MinB.KohY. (2022). Cross-National News Narratives of the Paralympic Games: Computational Text Analysis of the Media Coverage in the United States and South Korea. Communication & Sport. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221090420