The purpose of this study is to examine a massive shift in the framing of sports betting legalization in the United States. Thematic analysis from newspaper reports covering seminal moments in sports betting between 1991 (when public hearings were held prior to the passage of PASPA) and June 2018 (to include reports that immediately followed the fall of PASPA) identifies dominant frames and sources found in U.S. newspapers. Findings from this study reveal important implications for journalism and future policy making in a new era of widespread state-sponsored sports betting in the United States. Findings suggest that over time economic frames smothered moral/social and integrity frames surrounding legal sports betting. The discourse transformed from one of protecting vulnerable populations and the integrity of the games to one of protecting “consumers” who might gamble in a “safe, regulated” environment while contributing taxes to the state. Further, data revealed that official sources (e.g., professional sports representatives and elected officials) used access to newspaper reporting to assert tremendous influence over policy by shifting the narrative from prohibition to promotion of legalized sports betting.
BorchA. (2012). Gambling in the news and the revelation of market power: the case of Norway. International Gambling Studies, 12(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.616907.
6.
BowenG. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
7.
BraunVictoriaClarkeVictoria (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
8.
BroussardR. (2020). “Stick to sports” is gone: A field theory analysis of sports journalists’ coverage of socio-political issues. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1627–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.1785323
CampbellJ. L.QuincyC.OssermanJ.PedersenO. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143719889766
13.
ColemanR.ThorsonE.WilkinsL. (2011). Testing the effect of framing and sourcing in health news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 16(9), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.561918
14.
CollinsP. (2003). The moral case for legalizing gambling. In ReithG. (Ed.), Gambling: Who wins? Who loses? (pp. 322–333). Prometheus Books.
15.
CookJ. (1992, September 14). “If Roxborough says the spread is 7, it’s 7”. Forbes.
16.
CookW. A. (2005). The Louisville grays scandal of 1877. McFarland & company, Inc.
EntmanR.M. (2003). Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176.
21.
EntmanR. M.UsherN. (2018). Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx019
22.
FortunatoJ. A. (2020). Producing and promoting the sports gambling industry since the 2018 United States Supreme court ruling: A review of organizational action through suspense theory. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 13(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v13i1.1807
HingN.RussellA. M. T.LamontM.VitartasP. (2017). Bet anywhere, anytime: An analysis of internet sports bettors’ responses to gambling promotions during sports broadcasts by problem gambling severity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(4), 1051–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007.s10899-013-9404-7
27.
HoffmannJ. P. (2009). Gambling with the family. In WolfeA.OwensE. C. (Eds), Gambling: Mapping the American moral landscape (pp. 147–174). Baylor University Press.
28.
HoldenJ. T. (2019). Prohibitive failure: The demise of the ban on sports betting. Georgia State University Law Review, 35(2), 329–386.
29.
HoldenJ. T.EdelmanM. (2020). A short treatise on sports gambling and the law: How America regulates its most lucrative vice. Wisconsin Law Review, 2020(5), 907–974.
30.
HoldenJ. T.EdelmanM. (2021). Regulating vice: What the U.S. marijuana industry can learn from state governance of sports gambling. University of Illinois Law Review, 2021, 1051–1084. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671013.
31.
HumphreysA. (2010). Semiotic structure and the legitimation of consumption practices: The case of casino gambling. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/652464
32.
HumphreysA.LaTourK. A. (2013). Framing the game: Assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/672358
33.
HumphreysB. R. (2021). Legalized sports betting, VLT gambling, and state gambling revenues: Evidence from West Virginia. Eastern Economic Journal, 47(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-020-00178-0
34.
KaburakisA.RodenbergR. M.HoldenJ. T. (2015). Inevitable: Sports gambling, state regulation, and the pursuit of revenue. Harvard Business Law Review Online, 5(1), 27–38.
35.
KluchY. (2020). “My story is my activism!”: (Re-)Definitions of social justice activism among collegiate athlete activists. Communication & Sport, 8(4-5), 566–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519897288
36.
LangerA. I.GruberJ. B. (2020). Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: Why legacy media still matter a great deal. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023
37.
LeeG. (1992, June 2). Senate votes today on ban on state-run sports betting; Bill’s foes say leagues, politicians too cozy. Washington Post.
38.
LeeS.KimS.WangS.EaglemanA. G. (2016). Coverage of sports gambling from 2009 to 2013 in U.S. Newspapers: An analysis of newspaper-article framing. Journal of Sports Media, 11(2), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsm.2016.0012
39.
LičenS.FrandsenK.HorkyT.OnwumechiliC.WeiW. (2022). Rediscovering mediatization of sport. Communication & Sport, 10(5), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221123675
40.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2019). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage.
41.
Lopez-GonzalezH.GriffithsM. D. (2018b). Understanding the convergence of markets in online sports betting. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(2), 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216680602.
42.
Lopez-GonzalezH.GriffithsM. D. (2018a). Betting, forex trading, and fantasy gaming sponsorships-a responsible marketing Inquiry into the ‘gamblification’ of English Football. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(2), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9788-1.
43.
MelnickR. S. (2009). New politics, same old vice: Gambling in the twenty-first century. In WolfeA.OwensE. C. (Eds.), Gambling: Mapping the American moral landscape (pp. 97–111). Baylor University Press.
44.
MesikämmenE. (2016). Limited interests, resources, voices: Power relations in mainstream news coverage of Indigenous policy in Australia. Media, Culture & Society, 38(5), 721–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715620927
45.
MillerH. E.ThomasS. L.RobinsonP.DaubeM. (2014). How the causes, consequences and solutions for problem gambling are reported in Australian newspapers: A qualitative content analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 38(6), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12251
46.
MillerK. C.CabotA. N. (2018). Regulatory models for sports wagering: The debate between state vs. federal oversight. UNLV Gaming Law Journal, 8(2), 153–183.
SchwartzD. G. (2013). Roll the bones: The history of gambling casino edition. Winchester Books.
58.
SelinJ.NyrhinenR. (2022). Gambling policy positions of Finnish newspapers between 2004 and 2020: An automated content analysis. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 39(6), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725221083438
59.
SerazioM. (2019). The power of sports: Media and spectacle in American culture. New York University Press.
60.
ShawhanR. (2018). Legalizing federal sports gambling laws: You got to know when to hold’em. Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal, 40(1), 41–68.
SuggsD. W. (2016). Tensions in the press box: Understanding relationships among sports media and source organizations. Communication & Sport, 4(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479515577191
63.
TewksburyD.ScheufeleD. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–34). Erlbaum.
WolfeA. (2009).The culture war issue that never was: Why the right and left have overlooked gambling. In WolfeA.OwensE. C. (Eds.), Gambling: Mapping the American moral landscape (pp. 373–393). Baylor University Press.
66.
WongI. A.LuoJ.FongV. H. I. (2019). Legitimacy of gaming development through framing: An insider perspective. Tourism Management, 74(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.03.005
67.
ZirinD. (2008). A people’s history of sports in the United States. The New Press.
