The bullet-screen function is an augmented comment feature that has been adopted by the majority of Over-the-Top (OTT) services to foster users’ interaction and watching experience. This feature empowers sports customers to post and view numerous, short, and fast-moving comments that overlap over the screen while watching live stream sports events in real time. This research aims to investigate how sports fans embrace the bullet-screen feature while watching live stream sports. Through a combination of thematic analyzing bullet-screen comments from a National Basketball Association Finals game, and semi-structured interviews among bullet-screen users (N = 15), the results indicate that sport fans’ bullet-screen messages could be classified into five categories: critical commentary, socialization, supportive interactions, random messages, and trash talk. Four motives for sports fans to engage with bullet-screen posting were identified: entertainment, gathering information, interaction, and finding belonging. The study also showed that the inappropriateness of comments and too much overlay on the screen could prevent sports fans from utilizing the service. Theoretical and practical implications have also been discussed.
AllenM. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sage Publications.
2.
BillingsA. C.LewisM.BrownK. A.XuQ. (2020). Top rated on five networks—and nearly as many devices: The NFL, social TV, fantasy sport, and the ever-present second screen. International Journal of Sport Communication, 13(1), 55-76.
CantrilH.AllportG. W. (1935). The psychology of radio. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
5.
Chan-OlmstedS.XiaoM. (2019). Smart sports fans: Factors influencing sport consumption on smartphones. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 28(4), 181-194.
6.
CharmazK. (2010). Studying the experience of chronic illness through grounded theory. In ScamblerG.ScamblerS. (Eds.), New directions in the sociology of chronic and disabling conditions (pp. 8-36). Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
8.
CunninghamN. R.EastinM. S. (2017). Second screen and sports: A structural investigation into team identification and efficacy. Communication & Sport, 5(3), 288-310.
9.
FanS.LiuJ.LuY.PanZ. (2018). User comments get closer: The impacts of Danmu proximity on video quality of experience and user engagement. PACIS 2018 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/293
10.
FengS. (2018). Danmu shipin yuyan de sida tezheng [Four main features of danmu video language]. Chuanmei [Media], 6(1), 47-48.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
13.
FiloK.LockD.KargA. (2015). Sport and social media research: A review. Sport Management Review, 18(2), 166-181.
14.
HanX. (2020). Tiyusaishi wangluozhibozhong danmude buwenming xianxiang yanjiu [Exploring the uncivilized phenomenon of Danmu in the live broadcast of sports events]. Chuanmeiluntan [Media Forum], 16, 18-20. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/81232X/202016/7102649920.html
15.
HaoX.XuS.ZhangX. (2019). Barrage participation and feedback in travel reality shows: The effects of media on destination image among Generation Y. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 12, 27-36.
16.
HsiaoC. H. (2015). The verbal art of tucao and face-threatening acts in danmu screening. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(2), 109-132.
17.
HutchinsB.LiB.RoweD. (2019). Over-the-top sport: Live streaming services, changing coverage rights markets and the growth of media sport portals. Media, Culture & Society, 41(7), 975-994.
18.
HutchinsB.SandersonJ. (2017). The primacy of sports television: Olympic media, social networking services, and multi-screen viewing during the Rio 2016 games. Media International Australia, 164(1), 32-43.
19.
JohnsonD. (2013). Polyphonic/pseudo-synchronic: Animated writing in the comment feed of Nicovideo. Japanese Studies, 33(3), 297-313.
20.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
21.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In BlumlerJ. G.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Sage Publications.
22.
KhanM. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247.
23.
KroonÅ. (2017). More than a hashtag: Producers’ and users’ co-creation of a loving “we” in a second screen TV sports production. Television & New Media, 18(7), 670-688.
24.
LiB.DittmoreS. W.ScottO. K. M. (2017). Points of attachment on social media: Exploring similarities and differences between Chinese and Western National Basketball Association fans. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, 6(3), 201-215.
25.
LiB.DittmoreS. W.ScottO. K. M.LoW. J.StokowskiS. (2019). Why we follow: Examining motivational differences in following sport organizations on Twitter and Weibo. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 335-347.
26.
LiuL.SuhA.WagnerC. (2016). Watching online videos interactively: The impact of media capabilities in Chinese Danmaku video sites. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(3), 283-303.
27.
MastromartinoB.RossW. J.WearH.NaraineM. L. (2020). Thinking outside the ‘box’: A discussion of sports fans, teams, and the environment in the context of COVID-19. Sport in Society, 23, 1707-1723.
28.
NaraineM. L.KargA. J. (2019). Digital media in international sports: Engaging fans via social media and fantasy sports. In MacIntoshE.BravoG.LiM. (Eds.), International sport management (pp. 315-331). Human Kinetics.
29.
NaraineM. L.ParentM. M. (2016). Illuminating centralized users in the social media ego network of two national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 30, 689-701.
PhuaJ. J. (2010). Sports fans and media use: Influence on sports fan identification and collective self-esteem. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(2), 190-206.
33.
RubenkingB.LewisN. (2016). The sweet spot: An examination of second-screen sports viewing. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(4), 424-439.
34.
RubinA. M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 67–77.
35.
SmithS. (2006). Encouraging the use of reflexivity in the writing up of qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13(5), 209-215.
36.
SmithL. R.PegoraroA.CruikshankS. A. (2019). Tweet, retweet, favorite: The impact of Twitter use on enjoyment and sports viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(1), 94-110.
37.
StaffordT. F.StaffordM. R.SchkadeL. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288.
38.
StavrosC.MengM. D.WestbergK.FarrellyF. (2014). Understanding fan motivation for interacting on social media. Sport Management Review, 17(4), 455-469.
39.
SunS.WangF.HeL. (2018). Movie summarization using bullet screen comments. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(7), 9093-9110.
WangK.PanZ.LuY.GuptaS. (2019). What motives users to participate in Danmu on live streaming platforms? The impact of technical environment and effectance. Data and Information Management, 3(3), 117-134.
42.
WanA.MoscowitzL.WuL. (2020). Online social viewing: Cross-cultural adoption and uses of bullet-screen videos. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 197-215.
43.
WannD. L. (1995). Preliminary validation of the sport fan motivation scale. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 19(4), 377-396.
44.
Weimann-SaksD.ArielY.Elishar-MalkaV. (2020). Social second screen: WhatsApp and watching the World Cup. Communication & Sport, 8(1), 123-141.
45.
WhitingA.WilliamsD. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369.
46.
ZhaiJ. (2020). CNNIC Report: The scale of ecommerce live broadcast users reached 264 million, accounting for 29.3% of total netizens (CNNIC报告: 电商直播用户规模达2.65亿 占网民整体比例29.3%). Donews.com. Retrieved fromhttps://www.donews.com/news/detail/1/3092240.html
47.
ZhangL. T.CassanyD. (2019). ‘Is it always so fast?’: Chinese perceptions of Spanish through danmu video comments. Spanish in Context, 16(2), 217-242.
48.
ZhangZ.ZhangL.LiY. (2020). The analysis of influence factors of user experience in bullet screen. In AhramT.FalcãoC. (Eds.), Advances in usability, user experience, wearable and assistive technology, (pp. 272-278). Springer International Publishing.
