Covering sport mega events is a pivotal strategy for public service broadcasting (PSB) to claim audience support and public legitimacy. However, these mega events are subject to considerable controversy due to their association with doping or corruption. This raises the question for the PSB of how to satisfy the audience of the Olympic Games: by looking closely or by looking away? Conducting two empirical studies, this article investigates how German public service broadcasters reported the sociopolitical problems related to the 2016 Olympic Summer Games and whether the coverage has met the expectations of the audience. The results of a content analysis suggest that a substantial amount of coverage was dedicated to the problematic aspects of the Games. A conjoint analysis shows that German public service broadcasters did not meet the expectations of different audience segments: Neither the core audience nor event-driven spectators and certainly not the outsiders of media sports were fully satisfied by the Olympic program menu of German PSB.
BardoelJ.d’HaenensL. (2008). Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: Prospects, promises and problems. Media, Culture & Society, 30, 337–355.
4.
BornG.ProsserT. (2001). Culture and consumerism: Citizenship, public service broadcasting and the BBC’s fair trading obligations. Modern Law Review, 64, 657–687. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00345
5.
BoyleR.HaynesR. (2000). Power play: Sport, the media and popular culture. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
6.
BurtonR. (2003). Olympic games host city marketing: An exploration of expectations and outcomes. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 37–47.
7.
ChappeletJ.-L.ParentM. M. (2015). The (wide) world of sports events. In ParentM. M.ChappeletJ.-L. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports event management (pp. 1–17). London, England: Routledge.
8.
CraigP. (2016). Sport sociology. London, England: Sage.
9.
CraigP.WuP. (2016). Sport and the media. In CraigP. (Ed.), Sport sociology (pp. 240–267). London, England: Sage.
10.
CuriM.KnijnikJ.MascarenhasG. (2011). The Pan American Games in Rio de Janeiro 2007: Consequences of a sport mega-event on a BRIC country. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46, 140–156. doi:10.1177/1012690210388461
11.
DavidM.MillwardP. (2014). Sport and new media. In GiulianottiR. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the sociology of sport (pp. 388–397). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
DonsbachW. (2008). Factors behind journalists’ professional behavior: A psychological approach to journalism research. In LöffelholzM.WeaverD. (Eds.), Global journalism research: Theories, methods, findings, future (1st ed., pp. 65–78). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
13.
EggerA.van EimerenB. (2016). Bewegtbild im Internet: Markt und Nutzung digitaler Plattformen. Analyse des Marktumfelds und empirische Ergebnisse aus der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie [Audio-visual content on the Internet: Market and use of digital platforms. Analysis of the market and empirical evidences of the ARD/ZDF Online Study]. Media Perspektiven, 46, 108–119.
FlemmingF.LünichM.MarcinkowskiF.StarkeC. (2017). Coping with dilemma: How German sport media users respond to sport mega events in autocratic countries. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52, 1008–1024. doi:10.1177/1012690216638545
GeeB. L.LebermanS. I. (2011). Sports media decision making in France: How they choose what we get to see and read. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4, 321–343. doi:10.1123/ijsc.4.3.321
18.
GeeseS.GerhardH. (2012). Die Olympischen Spiele 2012 im Fernsehen. Nutzung und Bewertung durch die Zuschauer [The television broadcasts of the 2012 Olympic Games: Viewers’ use and ratings]. Media Perspektiven, 42, 546–554.
19.
GörnerF. (1995). Vom Außenseiter zum Aufsteiger. Ergebnisse der ersten repräsentativen Befragung von Sportjournalisten in Deutschland[From outsider to climber. Results of the first representative survey of sports journalists in Germany]. Berlin, Germany: Vistas.
20.
GreenP. E.KriegerA. M.WindY. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31, 56–73. doi:10.1287/inte.31.3s.56.9676
GscheidleC.GerhardH. (2016). Die Olympischen Spiele 2016 im Fernsehen [The television broadcasts of the 2016 Olympic Games]. Media Perspektiven, 11, 549–556.
23.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HardinM. (2005). Stopped at the gate: Women’s sports, “reader interest,” and decision making by editors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 62–77. doi:10.1177/107769900508200105
25.
Hebbel-SeegerA.HorkyT. (Eds.). (2013). Crossmediale Kommunikation und Verwertung von Sportveranstaltungen[Cross-media communication and the valorization of sport events]. Aachen, Germany: Meyer & Meyer.
26.
HughesS.ShankM. (2005). Defining scandal in sports: Media and corporate sponsor perspectives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14, 207–216.
27.
HutchinsB.RoweD. (2009). From broadcast scarcity to digital plenitude: The changing dynamics of the media sport content economy. Television & New Media, 10, 354–370.
JhallyS. (1989). Cultural studies and the sports/media complex. In WennerL. A. (Ed.), Media, sports, & society (pp. 70–93). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
KiddB. (2010). Human rights and the Olympic movement after Beijing. Sport in Society, 13, 901–910. doi:10.1080/17430431003651123
32.
KimK.YunL. (2013). Enjoyment from watching mediated sports: Four conceptual frameworks to understand the enjoyment construct. In PedersenP. M. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sport communication (pp. 310–318). London, England: Routledge.
33.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.DavidP.EastinM. S.TamboriniR.GreenwoodD. (2009). Sports spectators’ suspense: Affect and uncertainty in sports entertainment. Journal of Communication, 59, 750–767. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01456.x
34.
KulczyckiW.KoenigstorferJ. (2016). Why sponsors should worry about corruption as a mega sport event syndrome. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16, 1–30. doi:10.1080/16184742.2016.1188839
35.
LowesM. D. (1999). Inside the sports pages: Work routines, professional ideologies, and the manufacture of sports news. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
36.
Lozar ManfredaK.VehovarV. (2008). Internet surveys. In de LeeuwE.HoxJ. J.DillmanD. A. (Eds.), International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 264–284). Hove, England: Taylor & Francis.
37.
McLarenR. H. (2016). Independent person WADA investigation of Sochi allegations. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-Doping Agency.
38.
MeierH. E. (2003). Beyond convergence: Understanding programming strategies of public broadcasters in competitive environments. European Journal of Communication, 18, 337–365. doi:10.1177/02673231030183003
39.
MikosL. (2016). Digital media platforms and the use of TV content: Binge watching and video-on-demand in Germany. Media and Communication, 4, 154–161. doi:10.17645/mac.v4i3.542
40.
MoeH.SyvertsenT. (2008). Researching public service broadcasting. In Wahl-JorgensenK.HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 398–412). London, England: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203877685.ch28
41.
OrmeB. K. (2010). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research.
42.
OsborneA.SherryE.NicholsonM. (2016). Celebrity, scandal and the male athlete: A sport media analysis. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16, 255–273. doi:10.1080/16184742.2016.1164214
43.
PfetschB. (1996). Convergence through privatization? Changing media environments and televised politics in Germany. European Journal of Communication, 11, 427–451. doi:10.1177/0267323196011004002
44.
RaneyA. A. (2006). Why we watch and enjoy mediated sports. In RaneyA. A.BryantJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 339–356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
RoweD. (2004). Watching brief: Cultural citizenship and viewing rights. Sport in Society, 7, 385–402. doi:10.1080/1743043042000291703
47.
SamuelS.StubbsW. (2012). Green Olympics, green legacies? An exploration of the environmental legacies of the Olympic Games. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48, 485–504. doi:10.1177/1012690212444576
48.
Samuel-AzranT.YarchiM.GalilyY.TamirI. (2016). Promoting terror or sport? The case of Qatar’s international image. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 1–15. doi:10.1177/0002764216632841
49.
ScannellP. (1990). Public service broadcasting: The history of a concept. In GoodwinA.WhannelG. (Eds.), Understanding television (pp. 11–29). London, England: Routledge.
50.
SchallhornC. (2017). Kultivierung durch Sportgroßereignisse. Zum Einfluss der Medienberichterstattung über die Fußballweltmeisterschaft 2014 auf die Wahrnehmung des Gastgeberlandes Brasilien[Cultivation through sport mega events. The media’s influence on the perception of Brazil as the host of the FIFA World Cup 2014]. Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem.
51.
Schausteck de AlmeidaB. S.BolsmannC.Marchi JúniorW.de SouzaJ. (2015). Rationales, rhetoric and realities: FIFA’s World Cup in South Africa 2010 and Brazil 2014. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50, 265–282. doi:10.1177/1012690213481970
52.
SchererJ.RoweD. (2014). Sport, public broadcasting, and cultural citizenship: Signal lost? Routledge research in sport, culture and society (Vol. 25). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
SchererJ.SamM. P. (2012). Public broadcasting, sport and cultural citizenship: Sky’s the limit in New Zealand?Media, Culture & Society, 34, 101–111. doi:10.1177/0163443711429234
54.
SchererJ.WhitsonD. (2009). Public broadcasting, sport, and cultural citizenship. The future of sport on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation?International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 44, 213–229. doi:10.1177/1012690209104798
55.
SchoenbachK.LaufE. (2002). The “trap” effect of television and its competitors. Communication Research, 29, 564–583. doi:10.1177/009365002236195
56.
SherwoodM.OsborneA.NicholsonM.SherryE. (2016). Newswork, news values, and audience considerations. Communication & Sport, 5, 647–668. doi:10.1177/2167479516645535
57.
SolbergH.-A. (2007). Commentary: Sports broadcasting: Is it a job for public service broadcasters? A welfare economic perspective. Journal of Media Economics, 20, 289–309.
58.
SolbergH.-A.GrattonC. (2013). Broadcasting the Olympics. In FrawleyS.AdairD. (Eds.), Managing the Olympics (pp. 147–164). London, England: Palgrave.
59.
StarkeC.FlemmingF. (2017). Who is responsible for doping in sports? The attribution of responsibility in the German print media. Communication & Sport, 5, 245–262. doi:10.1177/2167479515603712
SyvertsenT. (2004). Citizens, audiences, customers and players. A conceptual discussion of the relationship between broadcasters and their publics. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7, 363–380. doi:10.1177/1567549404044788
63.
TjernströmS.TjernströmE. (2008). Rational foolishness would destroy a public service broadcasting system. Journal of Media Economics, 21, 258–263.
64.
van den BulckH. (2015). Public service media accountability in recent decades. A progressive shift from state to market. In Arriaza IbarraK.NowakE.KuhnR. (Eds.), Public service media in Europe: A comparative approach (pp. 73–88). London, England: Routledge.
