In the last few decades, our exposure to sport has increased dramatically through advancements in television, Internet, and mobile technologies. This rise in exposure and accessibility has increased biological knowledge among sport “fans,” a concept I use broadly, and complicated our relationship with sport. Using Rose’s notion of biological citizenship, which draws on Foucault’s concepts of biopolitics and biopower, I introduce “biological fandom” as a way to think about the intensification of bioknowledge in and around sport. As a problem space where various relationships of power intersect, biofandom creates new forms of knowledge, surveillance, and ethical problems. In this article, I sketch the relations of power that create biological fandom. First, I focus on aspects of the media that are concerned with quantifying the bodies of athletes and new biomedical treatments in sports medicine. Second, within this larger media context, I proceed to explore what I see as a particularly concentrated manifestation of biofandom, fantasy sports. Using examples from fantasy sports media, I argue that biological fandom perpetuates neoliberal norms that encourage self-work and individualism among “biofans,” while also fetishizing the individual athlete and creating undifferentiated athletic masses.
BaumanZ. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
7.
BellamyR. (2006). Sports media: A modern institution. In RaneyA.BryantJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 63–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
BillingsA. (Ed.). (2011). Sports media: Transformation, integration, consumption. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BillingsA.HardinM. (Eds.). (2014). Routledge handbook of sport and new media. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
BillingsA.RuihleyB. (2014). The fantasy sport industry: Games within games. New York, NY: Routledge.
BowmanN.CranmerG. (2014). SocialMediaSport: The fan as a (mediated) participant in spectator sports. In AndrewB.HardinM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and new media (pp. 213–224). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
BriggsC.HallinD. (2007). Biocommunicability: The neoliberal subject and its contradictions in news coverage of health issues. Social Text, 25, 43–66.
14.
BrownD.BryantJ. (2006). Sports content of U.S. television. In RaneyA.BryantJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 77–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
ButrynT. (2003). Posthuman podium: Cyborg narratives of elite track and field athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 17–39.
CaulfieldT.McGuireA. (2012). Athletes’ use of unproven stem cell therapies: Adding to inappropriate media hype?Molecular Therapy: The Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 20, 1656–1658.
19.
ChapmanG. (1997). Making weight: Lightweight rowing, technologies of power, and technologies of the self. Sociology of Sport Journal, 14, 205–223.
CoakleyJ. (1992). Burnout among adolescent athletes: A personal failure or social problem?Sociology of Sport Journal, 9, 271–285.
22.
ColeC. (1993). Resisting the canon: Feminist cultural studies, sport, and technologies of the body. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17, 77–97.
23.
DaveL.NylandJ.McKeeP.CabornD. (2012). Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the sports knee: Where are we in 2011?Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 4, 252–257.
DrayerJ.ShapiroS.DwyerB.MorseA.WhiteJ. (2010). The effects of fantasy football participation on NFL consumption: A qualitative analysis. Sport Management Review, 13, 129–141.
GouldD.CarsonS. (2004). FUN and Games?Youth Studies Australia, 23, 19–26.
37.
HardtM.NegriA. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
38.
HenningA. D. (2014). (Self-)Surveillance, anti-doping, and health in non-elite road running. Surveillance & Society, 11, 494–507.
39.
HoganM.WalkerG.CuiL.FuF.HuardJ. (2015). The role of stem cells and tissue engineering in orthopaedic sports medicine: Current evidence and future directions. The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 31, 1017–1021.
JhallyS. (1989). Cultural studies and the sports/media complex. In WennerL. (Ed.), Media, sports, and society (pp. 70–93). New York, NY: Sage.
42.
JohnsD.JohnsJ. (2000). Surveillance, subjectivism and technologies of power: An analysis of the discursive practice of high-performance sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35, 219–234.
MaguireJ. (2002). Michel Foucault: Sport, power, technologies and governmentality. In MaguireJ.YoungK. (Eds.), Theory, sport & society (pp. 293–316). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
47.
MarkulaP. (2003). The technologies of the self: Sport, feminism, and Foucault. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 87–107.
48.
MarkulaP. (2004). “Tuning into one’s self”: Foucault’s technologies of the self and mindful fitness. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 302–321.
49.
MarkulaP. (2014). Foucault and the new sport media. In BillingsA.HardinM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and new media (pp. 55–66). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
McLaneJ. (2008, 126). Linebacker Conner initiated into pre-draft cattle call. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. E03.
51.
MillerT. (1998). Technologies of truth: Cultural citizenship and the popular media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
MillerT. (2009). Michel Foucault and the critique of sport. In CarringtonB.McDonaldI. (Eds.), Marxism, cultural studies and sport (pp. 181–194). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
MillerT.LawrenceG.McKayJ.RoweD. (2001). Globalization and sport: Playing the World. London, England: Sage.
54.
OatesT. (2007). The erotic gaze in the NFL draft. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4, 74–90.
55.
OatesT. (2009). New media and the repackaging of NFL fandom. Sociology of Sport Journal, 26, 31–49.
56.
OatesT. P.DurhamM. G. (2004). The mismeasure of masculinity: The male body, “race” and power in the enumerative discourses of the NFL draft. Patterns of Prejudice, 38, 301–320.
57.
ParkJ. (2005). Governing doped bodies: The World anti-doping agency and the global culture of surveillance. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 5, 174–188.
RaneyA.BryantJ. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of sports and media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62.
RobinsonM. J.TrailG. T. (2005). Relationships among spectator gender, motives, points of attachment, and sport preference. Journal of Sport Management, 19, 58.
63.
RoseN. (2001). The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society, 18, 1–30.
64.
RoseN. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
RoseN.NovasC. (2005). Biological citizenship. In OngA.CollierS. (Eds.), Global assemblages (pp. 439–463). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
RoweD. (2004). Sport, culture and the media. London, England: Open University Press.
70.
RoweD. (2011). Global media sport: Flows, forms and futures. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
71.
RoweD.HutchinsB. (2014). Globalization and online audiences. In BillingsA.HardinM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and new media (pp. 7–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
RuihleyB.HardinR. (2010). Message boards and the fantasy sport experience. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4, 233–252.
73.
RuihleyB.HardinR. (2013). Meeting the informational needs of the fantasy sport user. Journal of Sports Media, 8, 53–80.
74.
RuihleyB.HardinR. (2014). Fantasy sport: More than a game. In BillingsA.HardinM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and new media (pp. 237–246). New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
SandersonJ.KassingJ. (2011). Tweets and blogs: Transformative, adversarial, and integrative developments in sports media. In BillingsA. (Ed.), Sports media: Transformation, integration, consumption (pp. 114–127). New York, NY: Routledge.
76.
SandersonJ.KassingJ. (2014). New media and the evolution of fan-athlete interaction. In BillingsA.HardinM. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and new media (pp. 247–258). New York, NY: Routledge.
77.
SluggettB. (2011). Sport’s doping game: Surveillance in the biotech age. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28, 387–403.
78.
Society for American Baseball Research. (2015, 5). A guide to sabermetric research: The basics. Society for American Baseball Research. Retrieved fromhttp://sabr.org/sabermetrics/the-basics
79.
SuttonW. A.McDonaldM. A.MimeG. R.CimpermanJ. (1997). Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6, 15–22.
WaldbyC. (2000). The visible human project. London, England: Routledge.
83.
WannD.BranscombeN. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 14, 103–117.
84.
WannD.MelnickM.RussellG.PeaseD. (2001). Sport fans: The psychology and social impact of spectators. New York, NY: Routledge.
85.
WhannelG. (1992). Fields in vision: Television sport and cultural transformation. London, England: Routledge.
86.
WennerL. A. (Ed.) (1998). Mediasport. New York, NY: Routledge.
