Students with or at risk for disabilities often transition to secondary and postsecondary settings without the self-regulation and academic skills necessary to be successful. Effective study skills include both self-regulation (e.g., goal setting, self-monitoring) and academic (e.g., note-taking, graphic organizers) skills that support student success. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to identify the available literature on the implementation of small-group study skills programs implemented in secondary and postsecondary educational settings. We identified 24 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were implemented in postsecondary settings (66.7%). Studies included students with specific learning disabilities, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, multiple disabilities, or autism spectrum disorder. Study skills frequently taught were self-regulation skills (79.2%), self-testing/exam preparation (66.7%), time management (58.3%), other study skills (54.2%), note-taking (45.8%), materials organization (37.5%), and graphic organizers (16.7%). Most small-group study skills programs were taught in groups of eight or less students, implemented for more than 9 weeks, and met once per week. Implications for future research to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of the programs are discussed.
AroraR. (2016). Academic achievement of adolescents in relation to study habits. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(2), 47–54. https://doi.org/18.01.160/20160302
3.
*ArroyoS. G. (1981). Effects of a multifaceted study skills program on class performance of Chicano college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 3(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/073998638100300204
4.
*BiancoL.McCormickS. (1989). Analysis of effects of a reading study skill program for high school learning-disabled students. The Journal of Educational Research, 82(5), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1989.10885907
5.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS. C. (2021). Tier 2: Critical issues in systems, practices, and data. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 29(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426620949859
6.
*CançadoL.ReiselJ. R.WalkerC. M. (2018). Impact of first-year mathematics study groups on the retention and graduation of engineering students. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1423120
7.
ChallengerC. D.LombardiA. R.DuquetteK.EspositioC.DeJesusJ. (2024). Strategies to increase collaboration between school counselors and transition specialists: A multi-tiered approach to college and career readiness. Journal of Education, 205(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574241309103
8.
*CukrasG. A. G. (2006). The investigation of study strategies that maximize learning for underprepared students. College Teaching, 54(1), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.194-197
9.
*DanchiseR. A. (1985). Academic skills in the counseling center. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26(3), 245–246.
10.
*DeckerT. W.RussellR. K. (1981). Comparison of cue-controlled relaxation and cognitive restructuring versus study skills counseling in treatment of test-anxious college underachievers. Psychological Reports, 49(2), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1981.49.2.459
11.
*DiCeccoV. M.GleasonM. M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350040201
12.
*DiehlT. E.HammanK. J.RiveraS. (2020). Group study as a form of support for developmental mathematics students. Learning Assistance Review, 25(1), 9–38.
13.
DuPaulG. J.WeyandtL. L.O’DellS. M.VarejaoM. (2009). College students with ADHD: Current status and future directions. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054709340650
*EngleC. C.ReillyN. P.LevineH. B. (2004). A case study of an academic retention program. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 5(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2190/JP0W-5358-Y7DJ-14B2
17.
FazalS.HussainS.MajokaM. I. (2012). The role of study skills in academic achievement. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 27(1), 37–51.
18.
FlanneryK. B.KatoM. M.KittelmanA.McIntoshK.TriplettD. (2020). A tier 1 intervention to increase ninth grade engagement and success: Results from a randomized controlled trial. School Psychology, 35(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000347
HadwinA. F.WinneP. H. (2012). Promoting learning skills in undergraduate students. In KirbyJ. R.LawsonM. J. (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 201–227). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048224.013
21.
HafenC. A.AllenJ. P.MikamiA. Y.GregoryA.HamreB.PiantaR. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9739-2
22.
*HartungC. M.CanuW. H.SerranoJ. W.VaskoJ. M.StevensA. E.Abu-RamadanT. M.BodalskiE. A.NegerE. N.BridgesR. M.GleasonL. L.AnzaloneC.FloryK. (2022). A new organizational and study skills intervention for college students with ADHD. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(2), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.09.005
23.
*HaydenL. K.McLaughlinT. F. (1987). Effects of a study skills curriculum with rural high school learning disabled students. Techniques, 3(3), 162–171.
JafariH.AghaeiA.KhatonyA. (2019). Relationship between study habits and academic achievement in students of medical sciences in Kermanshah-Iran. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 637–643. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S208874
26.
KatsiyannisA.ZhangD.RyanJ. B.JonesJ. (2007). High-stakes testing and students with disabilities: Challenges and promises. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18(3), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073070180030401
27.
*KaylerH.ShermanJ. (2009). At-risk ninth-grade students: A psychoeducational group approach to increase study skills and grade point averages. Professional School Counseling, 12(6), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0901200608
28.
*KirschenbaumD. S.MalettS. D.HumphreyL. L.TomarkenA. J. (1982). Specificity of planning and the maintenance of self-control: 1 year follow-up of a study improvement program. Behavior Therapy, 13(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(82)80067-1
29.
KittelmanA.Strickland-CohenM. K.ConleyK. M.HornerR. H. (2022). Allocating resources for tier 2 and 3 implementation within positive behavioral interventions and supports. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 57(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599221125889
30.
LaCountP. A.HartungC. M.SheltonC. R.StevensA. E. (2018). Efficacy of an organizational skills intervention for college students with ADHD symptomatology and academic difficulties. Journal of Attention Disorders, 22(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715594423
31.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
32.
*LangerM. A.NealJ. C. (1987). Strategies for learning: An adjunct study skills model. Journal of Reading, 31(2), 134–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40029825
33.
*LentR.LopezF.RomanoJ.WambachC. A. (1983). A program for reducing test anxiety for academically underprepared students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24, 265–266.
34.
*MalettS. D.KirschenbaumD. S.HumphreyL. L. (1983). Description and subjective evaluation of an objectively successful study improvement program. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 61(6), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-4918.1983.tb00038.x
35.
MazzottiV. L.KittelmanA.BromleyK. W.HiranoK. A. (2020). Experimental analysis of multi-component intervention to support youth in integrated work settings. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 53(2), 145–158. https://doi/10.3233/JVR-201092
36.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW. H.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/216514342095979
37.
MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.TestD. (2018). Including college and career readiness within a multitiered systems of support framework. AERA Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418761880
38.
NeseR. N. T.KittelmanA.Strickland-CohenM. K.McIntoshK. (2023). Examining teaming and tier 2 and 3 practices within a PBIS framework. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 25(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007211051090
39.
NotaL.SoresiS.ZimmermanB. J.(2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.001
40.
PetersM. D. J.MarnieC.TriccoA. C.PollockD.MunnZ.AlexanderL.McInerneyP.GodfreyC. M.KhalilH. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-20-00167
41.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. (2024). Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. http://www.prisma-statement.org/
42.
*RobinA.FoxxR. M.MartelloJ.ArchableC. (1977). Teaching note-taking skills to underachieving college students. The Journal of Educational Research, 71(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1977.10885042
43.
SanfordC.NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M.ShaverD. (2011). The post high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school (Key Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3004)). SRI International.
44.
SchafferG. E.ShafaieS. M.FaberA. J.(2021). Perceptions of high school and college students with autism related to their obstacles and strategies to academic success. Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education, 3(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.13021/jipe.2021.2728
45.
SenemogluN. (2011). College of education students’ approaches to learning and study skills. Education and Science, 36(160), 65–80.
46.
*SibleyM. H.MorleyC.RodriguezL.CoxeS. J.EvansS. W.MorsinkS.TorresF. (2020). A peer-delivered intervention for high school students with impairing ADHD symptoms. School Psychology Review, 49(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1720803
47.
*TammL.HamikE.YeungT. S.ZoromskiA. K.MaraC. A.DuncanA. (2023). Achieving independence and mastery in school: A school-based executive function group intervention for autistic middle schoolers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06164-7
48.
*TingS. M. R.GrantS.PlenertS. L. (2000). The excellence-commitment-and-effective-learning (EXCEL) group: An integrated approach for first-year college students’ success. Journal of College Student Development, 41(3), 353–360.
49.
*Van ZoostB. L.JacksonB. T. (1974). Effects of self-monitoring and self-administered reinforcement on study behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), 216–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1974.10884610
50.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities (A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2)). SRI International.
51.
*WeinsteinJ.VillaresE.BrigmanG. (2021). The effect of the student success skills small group intervention on factors associated with dropout potential. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 46(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1945175
52.
*WhyteC. B. (1978). Effective counseling methods for high-risk college freshman. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 10(4), 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2021.1945175
53.
ZimmermanB. J.GreenbergD.WeinsteinC. E. (2023). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zommerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 181–199). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
