The Importance of Network Intentionality: Examining Predictors of Interagency Collaboration for Secondary Special Educators

Abstract

Interagency collaboration (IAC) is mandated by U.S. federal legislation and is a well-established best practice in the transition literature. At the same time, there is limited research that examines the predictors of greater IAC, and the breadth of partners that secondary special educators collaborate with across school systems, service systems, and communities to support the transition process. Using a quantitative survey of 376 secondary special educators in a Midwestern U.S. state, we examined their IAC practices by documenting the characteristics of their social networks (i.e., diversity, communication patterns, and supports exchanged). Furthermore, we examined which malleable factors including network intentionality, collaboration self-efficacy, innovative action, and access to transition-focused professional development were associated with greater IAC. These findings provide a deeper portrait of transition-focused IAC and have implications for special educators and teacher preparation programs.

Keywords

transition interagency collaboration social network special education teacher preparation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balcazar

F. E.

Taylor-Ritzler

Dimpfl

Portillo-Peña

Guzman

Schiff

Murvay

(2012). Improving the transition outcomes of low-income minority youth with disabilities. Exceptionality, 20(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.670599

Bandura

(1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175

Biggs

E. E.

Bumble

J. L.

Hacker

R. E.

(2023). Professional networks of special educators and speech-language pathologists working with students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Remedial and Special Education, 44(5), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932522112849

Bullis

Davis

Bull

Johnson

(1995). Transition achievement among young adults with deafness: What variables relate to success? Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 130–150.

Bumble

J. L.

Carter

E. W.

Kuntz

(2022). Examining the transition networks of secondary special educators: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Remedial and Special Education, 43(6), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063485

Cohen

Klein

Daly

A. J.

Finnigan

(2011). Out with the old, in with the new: When are leader successions successful [New Directions in Leadership Annual Meeting]. The Wharton School of Business University of Pennsylvania.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Consortium on Chicago School Research. (2006). Public use data set: 2003 survey of students and teachers user’s manual.

Fabian

Dong

Simonsen

Luecking

D. M.

Deschamps

(2016). Service system collaboration in transition: An empirical exploration of its effects on rehabilitation outcomes for students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 82(3), 3–10.

10.

Flanagan

M. F.

Bumble

J. L.

(2022). Mapping Assets for Postschool Success (MAPS): Using digital resource mapping to enhance the transition process. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 56, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211068

11.

Flowers

Test

D. W.

Povenmire-Kirk

T. C.

Diegelmann

K. M.

Bunch-Crump

K. R.

Kemp-Inman

Goodnight

C. I.

(2018). A demonstration model of interagency collaboration for students with disabilities: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 211–221. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917720764

12.

Frey

B. B.

Lohmeier

J. H.

Lee

S. W.

Tollefson

(2006). Measuring collaboration among grant partners. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006290356

13.

Goddard

Kim

(2018). Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000102

14.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (2004).

15.

Lin

(1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.

16.

Lin

Y. C.

Hsung

R. M.

(2001). The position generator: Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In Lin

Cook

Burt

(Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 57–81). Aldine de Gruyter.

17.

Liou

Y. H.

Daly

A. J.

(2018). Evolving relationships of pre-service teachers: A cohort-based model for growing instructional practice through networks. In Yoon

Baker-Doyle

(Eds.), Networked by design (pp. 85–110). Routledge.

18.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

W. H.

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

19.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

20.

Moolenaar

N. M.

Daly

A. J.

Cornelissen

Liou

Y. H.

Caillier

Riordan

Wilson

Cohen

N. A.

(2014). Linked to innovation: Shaping an innovative climate through network intentionality and educators’ social network position. Journal of Educational Change, 15(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4

21.

Morningstar

M. E.

Benitez

D. T.

(2013). Teacher training matters: The results of a multi-state survey of secondary special educators regarding transition from school to adulthood. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412474022

22.

Oertle

K. M.

Trach

J. S.

(2007). Interagency collaboration: The importance of rehabilitation professionals’ involvement in transition. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73(3), 36–44.

23.

Park

Hill

J. C.

Montgomery

T. W.

Barker

K. E.

White

K. L.

(2022). A directed content analysis of interagency collaboration literature within the framework of the working alliance. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221090897

24.

Parker-Katz

M. B.

Cushing

L. S.

Athamanah

(2018). Fostering collaboration as transition specialists through community conversations. Journal of Disability Policy, 28(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/104420731773940

25.

Perera

H. N.

Calkins

Part

(2019). Teacher self-efficacy profiles: Determinants, outcomes, and generalizability across teaching level. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.006

26.

Perry

B. L.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models (Vol. 44). Cambridge University Press.

27.

Plotner

A. J.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rose

C. A.

Teasley

(2020). Perceptions of interagency collaboration: Relationships between secondary transition roles, communication, and collaboration. Remedial and Special Education, 41(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140723

28.

Povenmire-Kirk

Diegelmann

Crump

Schnorr

Test

Flowers

Aspel

(2015). Implementing CIRCLES: A new model for interagency collaboration in transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140723

29.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

Spina

S. U.

(2000). The network orientations of highly resilient urban minority youth: A network-analytic account of minority socialization and its educational implications. The Urban Review, 32, 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005122211864

30.

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, Pub. L. No. 113–128, H.R. 803 U.S.C. (2014).

31.

Yoon

S. A.

Baker-Doyle

K. J.

(2018). From understanding teacher social networks to interventions that build social capital. In Yoon

Baker-Doyle

(Eds.), Networked by design (pp. 1–6). Routledge.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB