At-promise students with disabilities benefit when educators implement culturally responsive/sustaining postsecondary transition practices. Yet, many educators lack the training and resources necessary to support culturally, ethnically, economically, and linguistically diverse youth and their families. To address this gap, the Culturally Responsive/Sustaining Transition Portfolio (CRSTP) assists educators, students, and families in preparing for postsecondary transition while respecting the values of families. This study assesses the usefulness of the CRSTP by training 45 Southwestern U.S. preservice teachers on culturally responsive/sustaining transition practices using the CRSTP, and then having them reflect on the product and process using the 11-item online reflective survey. Educators reported the CRSTP was a promising tool for applying culturally responsive/sustaining transition practices, building relationships, and collaborating with students and families. Findings indicate the CRSTP guided students in developing self-awareness, self-advocacy, and goal planning. The evaluation of this promising and practical educational tool holds the potential to impact at-promise youth, families, and educators.
AcholaE. O.GreeneG. (2016). Person-family centered transition planning: Improving post-school outcomes to culturally diverse youth and families. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160821
2.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
3.
BottianiJ. H.LarsonK. E.DebnamK. J.BischoffC. M.BradshawC. P. (2018). Promoting educators’ use of culturally responsive practices: A systematic review of inservice interventions. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117722553
4.
CookA. L. (2017). Employing a social justice framework to promote postsecondary transition for students with intellectual disability. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9336-8
5.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, evaluating, quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
7.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
8.
Darling-HammondL.WeiR. C.AndreeA. (2010). How high-achieving countries develop great teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
9.
Esteban-GuitartM.MollL. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515934
FowlerC. H.KonradM.WalkerA. R.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2007). Self-determination interventions’ effects on the academic performance of students with developmental disabilities. Education and training in developmental disabilities, 270–285.
GayG. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
14.
GothbergJ. E.GreeneG.KohlerP. D. (2019). District implementation of research-based practices for transition planning with culturally and linguistically diverse youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418762794
15.
HowardT. C.NavarroO. (2016). Critical race theory 20 years later: Where do we go from here?Urban Education, 51(3), 253–273. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915622541
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004). https://sites.ed.gov/idea/
17.
JezR. J. (2014). Empowering postsecondary transition planning for culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities by giving a voice to the family. In MichaelD.LoL. (Eds.), Promising practices to empower culturally and linguistically diverse families of children with disabilities (pp. 33–50). Information Age Publishing.
18.
JezR. J. (2023). CRSTP raw data and template [Data set]. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/ux7yb/
19.
JezR. J.OsborneK. M.HauthC. M. (2022). Educators coming together to empower learners, families, and teachers to develop culturally sustainable transition planning tool during COVID-19. In MedaL.ChitiyoJ. (Eds.), Inclusive pedagogical practices amidst a global pandemic: Issues and perspectives around the globe (pp. 241–262). Springer.
20.
KohlerP.GothbergJ.CoyleJ. (2019). Taxonomy for Transition programming for systems involved youth (2nd ed.). Western Michigan University.
21.
LandmarkL. J.JuS.GreeneG.LaiM. H. (2020). Evaluating special educator and transition personnel knowledge and skills for working with diverse families and students during the transition process: Preliminary development and validation of an assessment instrument. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 52(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-201080
22.
LandmarkL. J.ZhangD. (2013). Compliance and practices in transition planning: A review of individualized education program documents. Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511431831
23.
LeakeD.BooneR. (2007). Multicultural perspectives on self-determination from youth, parent, and teacher focus groups. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/08857288070300020101
24.
LindseyR. B.Nuri-RobinsK.TerrellR. D.LindseyD. B. (2018). Cultural proficiency: A manual for school leaders. Corwin Press.
25.
LoL.BuiO. (2020). Transition planning: Voices of Chinese and Vietnamese parents of youth with autism and intellectual disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419899938
26.
MorningstarM. E.BenitezD. T. (2013). Teacher training matters: The results of a multistate survey of secondary special educators regarding transition from school to adulthood. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 51–64.
27.
MorningstarM. E.FreyB. B.NoonanP. M.NgJ.Clavenna-DeaneB.GravesP.KellemsR.McCallZ.PearsonM.BjorkmanW.Williams-DiehmK. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809356568
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
31.
NgoB.LewisC.Maloney LeafB. (2017). Fostering sociopolitical consciousness with minoritized youth: Insights from community-based arts programs. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X1769012
32.
PapayC.UngerD. D.Williams-DiehmK.MitchellV. (2015). Begin with the end in mind: Infusing transition planning and instruction into elementary classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(6), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915587901
33.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
34.
Povenmire-KirkT. C.BethuneL. K.AlversonC. Y.KahnL. G. (2015). A journey, not a destination: Developing cultural competence in secondary transition. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(6), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915587679
35.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.SinclairJ. (2015). Strategies for teaching self-determination skills in conjunction with the common core. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(3), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214542043
36.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. Advances in Motivation Science, 6, 111–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
37.
ScottL. A.BrunoL.GokitaT.ThomaC. A. (2019). Teacher candidates’ abilities to develop universal design for learning and universal design for transition lesson plans. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1651910
38.
ScottL. A.ShogrenK. A. (2023). Advancing anti-racism and anti-ableism in transition: Equity-oriented indicators for research. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434231189665
39.
SinclairJ.JezR. J.BanksJ.KucharczykS. (2023). Building equity into transition practice and service delivery: A Call for systemic changes in the field of transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434231183415
40.
SukA. L.SinclairT. E.OsmaniK. J.Williams-DiehmK. (2020). Transition planning: Keeping cultural competence in mind. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419890308
41.
SwadenerB. B.LubeckS. (Eds.). (1995). Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk. SUNY Press.
42.
ThomaC. A.BartholomewC. C.ScottL. A. (2009). Universal design for transition: A roadmap for planning and discussion. Brookes Publishing.
43.
TrainorA. A. (2017). Transition by design: Improving equity and outcomes for adolescents with disabilities. Teachers College Press.
44.
TrainorA. A.MorningstarM. E.MurrayA. (2016). Characteristics of transition planning and services for students with high-incidence disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607348
45.
TrainorA. A.NewmanL.GarciaE.WoodleyH. H.TraxlerR. E.DescheneD. N. (2019). Postsecondary education-focused transition planning experiences of English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418811830
VygotskyL. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Harvard University Press.
49.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.ZagerD.SmithT. E.SimpsonR. (2010). Research-based principles and practices for educating students with autism: Self-determination and social interactions. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 475–486. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879754
50.
Williams-DiehmK. L.RoweD. A.JohnsonM. C.GuilmeusJ. F. (2017). A systematic analysis of transition coursework required for special education licensure. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417742404
51.
WiltC. L.MorningstarM. E. (2018). Parent engagement in the transition from school to adult life through culturally sustaining practices: A scoping review. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(5), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.5.307
52.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
