Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A host of challenges have been associated with providing work-based learning experiences (WBLEs) for students with disabilities; however, little is known about how special education teachers navigate or overcome these challenges. The purpose of this qualitative study therefore was to understand how special education teachers respond to the challenges they experience when providing WBLEs for students with extensive support needs. Participants were nine special education teachers in a Midwestern U.S. state who primarily serve 14- to 22-year-old students with extensive support needs. Each teacher participated in one semi-structured interview, and transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Teachers reported responding to challenges by (a) creating authentic school-based work experiences, (b) providing direct support for students and families, (c) networking and building new connections, and (d) advocating for students in school and community contexts. Findings from this study have practical implications for special education teachers who provide WBLEs for students with extensive support needs.

Keywords

work-based learning experiences intellectual disability extensive support needs overcoming challenges transition to work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Awsumb

Schutz

Carter

Schwartzman

Burgess

Lounds Taylor

(2022). Pursuing paid employment for youth with severe disabilities: Multiple perspectives on pressing challenges. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221075629

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klinger

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Braun

Clarke

(2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Brenner

H. R.

Dymond

S. K.

(2023). Teachers’ perspectives on challenges to providing work-based learning experiences for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 48(4), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969231204611

Bromley

K. W.

Hirano

Kittelman

Mazzotti

V. L.

McCroskey

(2022). Barriers to work-based learning experiences: A mixed methods study of perceptions from the field. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 56, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-211169

Carter

E. W.

Trainor

A. A.

Ditchman

Swedeen

Sun

Owens

(2010). Summer employment and community experiences of transition-age youth with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600204

Collet-Klingenberg

L. L.

Kolb

S. M.

(2011). Secondary and transition programming for 18-21-year-old students in rural Wisconsin. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051103000204

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Dymond

S. K.

(2020). Community skills. In Wehman

Kregel

(Eds.), Functional curriculum for elementary and secondary students with special needs (4th ed., pp. 165–184). Pro-Ed.

10.

Flanagan

M. F.

Bumble

J. L.

(2022). Mapping Assets for Postschool Success (MAPS): Using digital resource mapping to enhance the transition process. TEACHING Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211068143

11.

Frates

Spooner

Collins

B. C.

Running Bear

(2022). Vocabulary acquisition by multilingual students with extensive support needs during shared reading. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(3), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221113590

12.

Glesne

(2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Pearson.

13.

Kim

R. K.

Dymond

S. K.

(2010). Special education teachers’ perceptions of benefits, barriers, and components of community-based vocational instruction. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(5), 212–329. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.5.313

14.

Lipscomb

Lacoe

Liu

A. Y.

Haimson

(2018). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education [NCEE Evaluation Brief]. Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20184011/pdf/20184011.pdf

15.

Luecking

R. G.

(2020). The way to work (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brooks.

16.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

17.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Test

D. W.

(2020). Transitioning from school to employment and postsecondary education. In McDonnell

Brown

Snell

M.E.

(Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (9th ed., pp. 525–574). Pearson/Prentice-Hall.

18.

McDonnell

(2010). Instruction in community settings. In McDonnell

Hardman

M. L.

(Eds.), Successful transition programs: Pathways for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 173–202). Sage.

19.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

20.

Rooney-Kron

Dymond

S. K.

(2021). Teacher perceptions of barriers to providing work- based learning experiences. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(4), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420988492

21.

Schutz

M. A.

Schwartzman

Awsumb

J. M.

Burgess

Carter

E. W.

Lounds Taylor

(2023). Pathways to paid work for youth with severe disabilities: Perspectives on strategies for success. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 58, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-221221

22.

Southward

J. D.

Kyzar

(2017). Predictors of competitive employment for students with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 26–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420373

23.

Spooner

Kemp-Inman

Ahigrim-Deizell

Wood

Ley Devis

(2015). Generalization of literacy skills through portable technology for students with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915586190

24.

Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, (Perkins V), 20 U.S.C. § 2301. (2019).

25.

Taub

D. A.

McCord

J. A.

Ryndak

D. L.

(2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263

26.

U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Employment first. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/odep/initiatives/employment-first

27.

Wehman

Sima

Ketchum

West

Chan

Luecking

(2014). Predictors of successful transition from school to employment for youth with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 25, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9541-6

28.

Winsor

Timmons

Butterworth

Migliore

Domin

Zalewska

Shepard

(2021). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes through 2018 (pp. 1–49). Institute for Community Inclusion. https://www.thinkwork.org/sites/default/files/files/Blue%20Book%20Narrative2021.pdf

29.

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, 29 U.S.C. § 3101. (2014).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Navigating Challenges to Work-Based Learning Experiences: Responses From Special Educators

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material