Disparities in postschool outcomes between student groups associated with intersecting historical marginalizations such as ableism, racism, classism, and linguicism remain stark. Critical research methods have contributed to the development of equity-focused research. In this conceptual paper, we examine intersectional research, one critical methodology focused on equity. In a recent study of postsecondary transitions of multilingual students with disabilities in the northeastern United States, we found this methodology to be productive in examining marginalization and equitable transition outcomes. First, we define intersectionality and provide a rationale for its use. We then share foundational claims of intersectional research, and we provide illustrative examples from our study. The discussion identifies implementation strategies. Last, we share implications such as tensions, benefits, and insights from our application and the extant literature.
AnnammaS. A. (2014). Disabling juvenile justice: Engaging the stories of incarcerated young women of color with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514526785
2.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
3.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
4.
ArtilesA. J.King ThoriusK. A.BalA.NealR.WaitollerF. R.Hernández-SacaD. (2011). Beyond culture as group traits: Future learning disabilities ontology, epistemology, and inquiry on research knowledge use. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711417552
5.
BartlingS.FriesikeS. (2014). Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer.
6.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice (NiceR., Trans.). Stanford University Press.
7.
BrantlingerE. A.JiminezR. T.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
8.
BrooksR.te RieleK.MaguireM. (2014). Ethics and education research. SAGE.
ColeM. (2010). What’s culture got to do with it? Educational research as a necessarily interdisciplinary enterprise. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10380247
11.
CookB. G.FlemingJ. I.HartS. A.LaneK. L.TherrienW. J.van DijkW.WilsonS. E. (2021). A how-to guide for open-science practices in special education research. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193252110191000
12.
CorbinJ.StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
13.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
14.
EspositoJ.Evans-WintersV. (2022). Introduction to intersectional qualitative research. SAGE.
15.
FreireP. (2018). Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 50th anniversary edition (RamosM. Bergman, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
16.
GarcíaS. B.OrtizA. A. (2013). Intersectionality as a framework for transformative research in special education. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13(2), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.5555/muvo.13.2.yv7822w58116kw42
17.
HemmingsA. (2006). Great ethical divides: Bridging the gap between institutional review boards and researchers. Educational Researcher, 35(4), 12–18.
18.
HolmesA. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality: A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
19.
KozleskiE. B.King ThoriusK. A. (Eds.). (2014). Ability, equity, and culture: Sustaining inclusive urban education reform. Teachers College Press.
20.
LombardiA. R.RifenbarkG. G.TaconetA. V. (2023). Quality Indicators of secondary data analyses in special education research: A pre-registration guide. Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141029
21.
MuellerC. (2019). Adolescent understandings of disability labels and social stigma in school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576940
22.
ParisD.WinnM. T. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Sage.
23.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
24.
PugachM. C. (2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 439–453.
25.
QuraishiM.PhilburnR. (2015). Researching race and racism. SAGE.
26.
RomanoL. E.TrainorA. A.NewmanL. A. (2023). Triad transition planning for students receiving special education and English learner services, families, and teachers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143422114351
27.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
28.
SinclairJ.KucharczykS. (n.d.). Mattering: Engagement of anti-racist and abolitionist approaches in transition research and practice [Call for papers for special series]. Division on Career Development and Transition.
29.
SteltenpohlC. N.LustickH.MeyerM. S.LeeL. E.StegengaS. M.ReyesL. S.RenbargerR. (2022). Rethinking transparency and rigor from a qualitative open science perspective. Preprint:https://psyarxiv.com/bpu5f/
30.
StronachI.GarrattD.PearceC.PiperH. (2007). Reflexivity, the picturing of selves, the forging of method. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406295476
31.
TrainorA. A.CarterE. W.KarpurA.MartinJ. E.MazzottiV.MorningstarM. E.NewmanL.RojewskiJ. W. (2019). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324401
32.
TrainorA. A.MurrayA.KimH. (2016). English learners with disabilities in high school: Population characteristics, transition programs, and postschool outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515626797
33.
TrainorA. A.NewmanL.GarciaE.WoodleyH. H.TraxlerR. E.DescheneD. N. (2019). Postsecondary education-focused transition planning experiences of English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418811830
34.
TrainorA. A.NewmanL.RomanoL. (2022). Contextualizing school engagement during transition for students receiving special education and English learner services. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221107089
35.
TrainorA. A.RomanoL.SarkissianG.NewmanL. (in press). The pandemic as a tipping point: The precarity of transition for students who receive special education and English language services. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation.
36.
WehmeyerM. L. (2013). The story of intellectual disability. Paul H. Brookes.
37.
WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB. (2018). Creating space in between: Collaborative inquiries. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
38.
WyattT. R.ZaidiZ. (2022). Bricolage: A tool for race-related, historically situate complex research. Medical Education, 56(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/medu.14629
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
