Young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are vulnerable to transportation challenges which can contribute to a lack of community engagement. This article describes findings from a qualitative study in which we conducted one time, semistructured interviews with nine individuals with IDD (ages 18–25) and their parents/guardians in dyads. We also interviewed 10 adult service and local agency providers to incorporate different perspectives. Major themes included family factors, community structure, and systems challenges as barriers that impacted the transportation experiences of young adults with IDD and their families. We provide implications for transition-related professionals and suggestions for future research and policy focused on transportation.
AmadoA. N.StancliffeR. J.McCarronM.McCallionP. (2013). Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5), 360–375. https://doi.org/ggw46r
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
4.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101et seq. (1990).
5.
BarberJ. P.WalczakK. K. (2009, April). Conscience and critic: Peer debriefing strategies in grounded theory research [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, United States.
6.
BezyakJ. L.SabellaS.HammelJ.McDonaldK.JonesR. A.BartonD. (2020). Community participation and public transportation barriers experienced by people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(23), 3275–3283. https://doi.org/h7js
7.
BhattacharyaK. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.
8.
BiggsE. E.CarterE. W. (2016). Quality of life for transition-age youth with autism or intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(1), 190–204. https://doi.org/f75xkb
9.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/gdz5zv
10.
BrooksJ. O.MosseyM. E.TylerP.CollinsJ. C. (2013). An exploratory investigation: Are driving simulators appropriate to teach pre-driving skills to young adults with intellectual disabilities?British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/f6dgb8
11.
BrumbaughS. (2018). Travel patterns of American adults with disabilities (Issue brief). U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
12.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311414680
13.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
14.
CurryA. E.YerysB. E.HuangP.MetzgerK. B. (2018). Longitudinal study of driver licensing rates among adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 22(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/gdkh48
15.
DaviesM. D.BeamishW. (2009). Transitions from school for young adults with intellectual disability: Parental perspectives on “life as an adjustment.”Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(3), 248–257. https://doi.org/cm6j4c
16.
FeeleyC.DekaD.LubinA.McGackinM. (2015). Detour to the right place: A study with recommendations for addressing the transportation needs and barriers of adults on the Autism Spectrum in New Jersey (Technical report). Rutgers The State University of New Jersey.
17.
FriedmanC.RizzoloM. C. (2016). The state of transportation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services 1915 (c) waivers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(3), 168–177. https://doi.org/h7jw
18.
GallupJ.LamotheS. N.GallupA. (2015). Enhancing transportation education using mobile devices and applications. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915580027
19.
GuestG.NameyE.ChenM. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232076. https://doi.org/ghdr3p
20.
HaysD. G.SinghA. A. (2011). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. Guilford Press.
21.
Henning-SmithC.EvensonA.CorbettA.KozhimannilK.MoscoviceI. (2017). Rural transportation: Challenges and opportunities (Policy brief). University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center.
22.
HiranoK. A.RoweD.LindstromL.ChanP. (2018). Systemic barriers to family involvement in transition planning for youth with disabilities: A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(11), 3440–3456. https://doi.org/gff3df
23.
HuangJ. L.FordJ. K. (2012). Driving locus of control and driving behaviors: Inducing change through driver training. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(3), 358–368. https://doi.org/fm38xj
24.
HuangP.KaoT.CurryA. E.DurbinD. R. (2012). Factors associated with driving in teens with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 33(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/d9js6t
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400et seq. (2004).
26.
KozleskiE. B. (2017). The uses of qualitative research: Powerful methods to inform evidence-based practice in education. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/f9w7sp
27.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE.
28.
LeonardH.FoleyK.-R.PikoraT.BourkeJ.WongK.McPhersonL.LennoxN.DownsJ. (2016). Transition to adulthood for young people with intellectual disability: The experiences of their families. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(12), 1369–1381. https://doi.org/f9cfqx
29.
LindsayS. (2020). Accessible and inclusive transportation for youth with disabilities: Exploring innovative solutions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(8), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/h7jz
30.
LindsayS.LampteyD. L. (2019). Pedestrian navigation and public transit training interventions for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(22), 2607–2621. https://doi.org/h7j2
31.
LipscombS.HaimsonJ.LiuA. Y.BurghardtJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. L. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across disability groups: Full report (NCEE 2017-4018). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
32.
LubinA.FeeleyC. (2016). Transportation issues of adults on the autism spectrum: Findings from focus group discussions. Transportation Research Record, 2542(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/gjmgm6
33.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/ghzcqz
34.
McDonnallM. C. (2011). Predictors of employment for youth with visual impairments: Findings from the second National Longitudinal Transition Study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110500802
35.
MerriamS. B.GrenierR. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
36.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
PfeifferB.SellA.BevansK. B. (2020). Initial evaluation of a public transportation training program for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Transport & Health, 16, 100813. https://doi.org/gk4zkj
41.
PriceR.MarshA. J.FisherM. H. (2018). Teaching young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities community-based navigation skills to take public transportation. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/gk4zkk
42.
RandallK. N.RyanJ. B.StierleJ. N.WaltersS. M.BridgesW. (2021). Evaluating and enhancing driving skills for individuals with intellectual disabilities through simulator training. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 36(4), 191–200. https://doi.org/h7j3
43.
SchalockR. L. (1996). Quality of life: Vol. 1. Conceptualization and measurement. American Association on Mental Retardation.
44.
SchalockR. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/dgqz9m
45.
SchalockR. L.KeithK. D. (Eds.). (2016). Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disability. American Association on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities.
46.
StockS. E.DaviesD. K.HoelzelL. A.MullenR. J. (2013). Evaluation of a GPS-based system for supporting independent use of public transportation by adults with intellectual disability. Inclusion, 1(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/h7j6
47.
StraussA.CorbinJ. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. SAGE.
48.
TaylorD. L.MorganR. L.Callow-HeusserC. A. (2016). A survey of vocational rehabilitation counselors and special education teachers on collaboration in transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-150788
49.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960
50.
ThornS. H.PittmanA.MyersR. E.SlaughterC. (2009). Increasing community integration and inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(5), 891–901. https://doi.org/bwkr98
51.
TrainorA. A.CarterE. W.KarpurA.MartinJ. E.MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E.NewmanL.RojewskiJ. W. (2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/f2x3
52.
TrainorA. A.GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 267–274. https://doi.org/d6h3
53.
U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). How does the U.S. Census Bureau classify Rural America?U.S. Census Bureau. https://bit.ly/3ghm5uO
54.
Van AsseltD.BuchananA.PetersonS. (2015). Enablers and barriers of social inclusion for young adults with intellectual disability: A multidimensional view. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/gpgp8q
55.
WasfiR.Steinmetz-WoodM.LevinsonD. (2017). Measuring the transportation needs of people with developmental disabilities: A means to social inclusion. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 356–360. https://doi.org/f96rhz
56.
WehmeyerM. L. (2020). The importance of self-determination to the quality of life of people with intellectual disability: A perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7121. https://doi.org/h7j7
57.
ZalewskaA.MiglioreA.ButterworthJ. (2016). Self-determination, social skills, job search, and transportation: Is there a relationship with employment of young adults with autism?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/gf842z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
