Parents of youth with disabilities require knowledge to support their children in secondary school. In the 21st century, online asynchronous training is one way to provide knowledge to parents in learning secondary transition concepts. We explored the use of an asynchronous online intervention on three parents’ knowledge of the secondary transition process and confidence levels in supporting their children with disabilities. We used a single-case, concurrent multiple baseline design across three transition areas to evaluate parents’ knowledge of secondary transition planning. Preliminary evidence showed the asynchronous online training improved parents’ knowledge of secondary transition for two participants who completed the entire training program across all three transition areas. Limitations and recommendations for future research and practice are discussed.
BlackmanA. L.Jimenez-GomezC.ShvartsS. (2020). Comparison of the efficacy of online versus in-vivo behavior analytic training for parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000163
2.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311414680
3.
CoocN.BuiO. T. (2017). Characteristics of parent center assistance from the federation for children with special needs. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696285
DeweyJ.SindelarP. T.BettiniE.BoeE. E.RosenbergM. S.LekoC. (2017). Explaining the decline in special education teacher employment from 2005 to 2010. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916684620
6.
DoganR. K.KingM. L.FischettiA. T.LakeC. M.MathewsT. L.WarzakW. J. (2017). Parent-implemented behavioral skills training of social skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(4), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.411
7.
FrancisG.GrossJ. M. S.TurnbullR.Parent-JohnsonW. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of the family employment awareness training in Kansas: A pilot study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813807046953
8.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 239–282). Routledge.
9.
HiranoK. A.RoweD.LindstromL.ChanP. (2018). Systemic barriers to family involvement in transition planning for youth with disabilities: A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(11), 3340–3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1189-y
10.
HornerR. H.SwaminathanH.SugaiG.SmolkowskiK. (2012). Considerations for the systematic analysis and use of single-case research. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2012.0011
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of (2004). P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
12.
KranzowJ. (2013). Faculty leadership in online education: Structuring courses to impact student satisfaction and persistence. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 131–139. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no1/kranzow_0313.pdf
13.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
14.
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R.HornerR. H. (2018). Negative results: Conceptual and methodological dimensions in single-case intervention research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(3), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517741721
15.
KuB.MacDonaldM.HatfieldB.GunterK. (2020). Parental influence on the physical activity behaviors of young children with developmental disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 37(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2019-0120
16.
KunzeM. G.MachalicekW.WeiQ.St JosephS. (2021). Coaching via Telehealth: Caregiver-mediated interventions for young children on the waitlist for an autism diagnosis using single-case design. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(8), Article 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081654
17.
LakhalS.BazinetN. (2015). Technological factors explaining student dropout from online courses in higher education: A review. In CarlinerS.FulfordC.OstashewskiN. (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2015: World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 1806–1811). AACE. http://www.editlib.org/p/151456/
18.
LedfordJ. R.WoleryM. (2013). Procedural fidelity: An analysis of measurement and reporting practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113515908
19.
LeeY.ChoiJ. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
20.
LindgrenS.WackerD.SuessA.SchieltzK.PelzelK.KopelmanT.LeeJ.RomaniP.WaldronD. (2016). Telehealth and autism: Treating challenging behavior at lower cost. Pediatrics, 137(Supplement 2), S167–S175. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2851O
21.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793
22.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011018.pdf
24.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008). National Center for Special Education Research.
25.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
OrtizC.VidairH. B.AcriM.ChackoA.KobakK. (2020). Pilot study of an online parent-training course for disruptive behavior with live remote coaching for practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(2), 125–133. http://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000286
28.
PapayC. K.BambaraL. M. (2014). Best practices in transition to adult life for youth with intellectual disability. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413486693
29.
PeñaD. C. (2000). Parent involvement: Influencing factors and implications. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598741
30.
PiersonL. M.ThompsonJ. L.GanzJ. B.WattanawongwanS.HaasA. N.YlladesV. (2021). Coaching parents of children with developmental disabilities to implement a modified dialogic reading intervention using low technology via telepractice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(1), 119–136. http://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00037
31.
PollardJ. S.HigbeeT. S.AkersJ. S.BrodheadM. T. (2014). An evaluation of interactive computer training to teach instructors to implement discrete trials with children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(4), 765–776. http://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.152
32.
RakapS. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single subject experimental research: Description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12091
33.
RoweD. A.AlversonC. Y.UnruhD.FowlerC.KellemsR.TestD. W. (2015). A Delphi study to operationalize evidence-based predictors in secondary transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414526429
34.
RoweD. A.CarterE.GajjarS.MavesE. A.WallJ. C. (2020). Supporting strong transitions remotely: Considerations and complexities for rural communities during COVID-19. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520958199
35.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.FowlerC. H.TestD. W.MitchellV. J.ClarkK. A.HolzbergD.OwensT. L.RusherD.Seaman-TullisR. L.GushanasC. M.CastleH.ChangW.VoggtA.KwiatekS.DeanC. (2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674
36.
RoweD. A.TestD. W. (2010). The effects of computer-based instruction on the transition planning process. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 35(3–4), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.35.3-4.102
37.
SanfordC.NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.ShaverD. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school. Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3004). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Special Education Research.
38.
SchiavoG.ManaN.MichO.ZancanaroM.JobR. (2021). Attention-driven read-aloud technology increases reading comprehension in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 875–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12530
39.
SkylarA. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69–84. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ858506.pdf
40.
TaylorJ. L.HodappR. M.BurkeM. M.Waitz-KudlaS. N.RabideauC. (2017). Training parents of youth with autism spectrum disorder to advocate for adult disability services: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(3), 846–857. http://10.1007/s10803-016-2994-zA78
41.
TherrienW. J.CookB. G. (2018). Introduction to special issue: Null effects and publication bias in learning disabilities research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 33(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12163
Valicenti-McDermottM.LawsonK.HottingerK.SeijoR.SchechtmanM.ShulmanL.ShinnarS. (2015). Parent stress in families of children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Child Neurology, 30(13), 1728–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073815579705
44.
VannestK.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(4), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
45.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
46.
YoungJ.MorganR. L.Callow-HeusserC. A.LindstromL. (2016). The effects of parent training on knowledge of transition services for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(2), 79–87.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
