The Importance of Centers for Independent Living Supporting Youth With Disabilities: A Critical Contribution to Maximize Transition Service Delivery

Abstract

An integral element of maximizing positive postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities is interagency collaboration. Centers for Independent Living (CILs) can be critical service providers for youth and young adults with disabilities. This study explored CIL professionals’ contributions in supporting transition-age youth. Furthermore, the study examined these professionals’ perspectives of why CIL involvement is vital in transition service delivery. Eight dyads consisting of a CIL administrator and a CIL staff member providing direct services to transition-age youth with disabilities were interviewed from eight U.S. CILs. Thematic analysis of each interview transcript yielded themes related to the scope of services that CILs are providing in tandem with special education professionals, and why CIL professionals believe their involvement in secondary transition is critical. Findings included that interview participants delineated three overarching areas where CILs support transition-age youth while collaborating with schools. Furthermore, the findings showed that the crucial nature of CIL involvement in the transition service delivery process is rooted in several value-based principles. These five value-based principles were as follows: (a) Empowerment-, autonomy-, and independence-based, (b) youth-led and individualized, (c) strengths-based and goal-driven, (d) peer-based and disability-pride-driven, and (e) ensuring services were available and accessible. These findings, implications for practice, and future research directions are also discussed.

Keywords

secondary transition Center for Independent Living collaboration rehabilitation disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Kirkpatrick

(2016). Narrative interviewing. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38, 631–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0222-0

Barnes

(2003). Independent living, politics, and implications. https://www.independentliving.org/docs6/barnes2003.html

Boeijinga

Hoeken

Sanders

(2017). Storybridging: Four steps for constructing effective health narratives. Health Education Journal, 76(8), 923–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896917725360

Bogart

K. R.

Lund

E. M.

Rottenstein

(2018). Disability pride protects self-esteem through the rejection-identification model. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000166

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Caine

Estefan

Clandinin

D. J.

(2019). Narrative inquiry. In Atkinson

Delamont

Cernat

Sakshaug

J. W.

Williams

R. A.

(Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations (pp. 265–277). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036771087

Carter

E. W.

Awsumb

J. M.

Schutz

M. A.

McMillian

E. D.

(2021). Preparing youth for the world of work: Educator perspectives on pre-employment transition services. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420938663

Creswell

(2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.

DeJong

(1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60(10), 435–446.

10.

Guba

E. G.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(1989). Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE.

11.

Hammond

Lynn Jones

McElwee

(2018). Expanding CIL capacity through youth-driven transition services. IL-NET. https://www.ilru.org/expanding-cil-capacity-through-youth-driven-transition-services

12.

Holt

Eubanks

Jones

Davis

(2015). Establishing and managing fees-for-service in Centers for Independent Living. IL-NET. https://www.ilru.org/establishing-and-managing-fees-for-service-centers-for-independent-living-self-study-manual

13.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1350

14.

Kohler

P. D.

Gothberg

J. E.

Fowler

C. H.

Coyle

(2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0. Western Michigan University.

15.

Kuckartz

(2019). Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In Kaiser

Presmeg

(Eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 181–197). Springer.

16.

Lombardi

A. R.

Kern

Flannery

B. K.

Doren

(2017). Is college and career readiness adequately addressed in annual and postsecondary education goals? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(3), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317716147

17.

Magee

Plotner

A. J.

(2021). Examining barriers and strategies for effective professional or interagency collaboration in secondary transition. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 56(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-211170

18.

Mann

Wang

(2021). What happens after high school? A review of independent living practices to support youth with disabilities transitioning to adult life. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 55, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-211155

19.

Martin

(2012). Disability identity—disability pride. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 16(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2011.611832

20.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Sinclair

Poppen

Woods

W. E.

Shearer

M. L.

(2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047

21.

Oertle

K. M.

Bobroff

Sax

C. L.

(2021). Organizational policies and personnel factors that are incentives for and challenges to collaboration as identified by statewide transition supervisors. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320943544

22.

Oertle

K. M.

Seader

(2015). Research and practical considerations for rehabilitation transition collaboration. Journal of Rehabilitation, 81(2), 3–18.

23.

Plotner

A. J.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rose

C. A.

Teasley

(2020). Perceptions of interagency collaboration: Relationships between secondary transition roles, communication, and collaboration. Remedial and Special Education, 41(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518778029

24.

Plotner

A. J.

Oertle

K. M.

Reed

G. J.

Tissot

Kumpiene

(2017). Centers for independent living and their involvement with transition-age youth with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160841

25.

Plotner

A. J.

Shogren

K. A.

VanHorn Stinnett

Seo

(2016). Centers for independent living and secondary transition collaboration: Characteristics for enhanced service delivery for adolescents in the United States. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39, 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1193904

26.

Plotner

A. J.

Trach

J. S.

Oertle

K. M.

Fleming

A. R.

(2014). Differences in service delivery between transition VR counselors and general VR counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57(2), 109–115.

27.

Roos

Sondenaa

(2020). Improving the transition process to independent living for adolescents with profound intellectual disabilities: Experiences of parents and employees. BMC Health Services Research, 20, Article 1133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05976-y

28.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

29.

Saleh

M. C.

Shaw

Malzer

Podolec

(2019). Interagency collaboration in transition to adulthood: A mixed methods approach to identifying promising practices and process in the NYS PROMISE project. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 51, 183–198. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-191037

30.

Scotch

(2009). “Nothing about us without us”: Disability rights in America. OAH Magazine of History, 23(3), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/23.3.17

31.

Sprunger

N. S.

Harvey

M. W.

Quick

M. M.

(2018). Special education transition predictors for post-school success: Findings from the field. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1393789

32.

Taylor

J. P.

Whittenburg

H. N.

Thoma

C. A.

Gokita

Pickover

G. S.

(2019). Collaboration to improve employment outcomes for youth with disabilities: Implications of the Pre-ETS components of WIOA on IDEA transition requirements. Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities Online Journal, 6(1), 38–47.

33.

Tesch

(1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer.

34.

Wilson

(1998). Centers for independent living in support of transition. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13(4), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769801300406

35.

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, Pub. L. 113-128, 128 Stat. 1425.