Students with learning disabilities (LD) have not kept pace with peers without disabilities regarding enrollment in postsecondary education. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of I’m Determined youth leaders with LD who have enrolled in higher education. Participation led to structured experiences and opportunities to practice self-determined behaviors in an environment built to support the development of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The three major themes identified (struggle, community, and resilience) corresponded with experiences before, during, and after participation in I’m Determined. The major theme of struggle encompassed experiences at school and not understanding their disability. The theme of community affected participants in the context of disability awareness and opportunity. Resilience necessitated a change in mindset and the ability to overcome barriers. Altering classroom environments to support autonomy, competence, and relatedness is one way to reproduce the supports that led to these participants’ success.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
4.
CrantonP.MerriamS. B. (2015). Guide to research for educators and trainers of adults (3rd ed.). Krieger.
5.
CummingT. M.SmedleyE. N. (2016). Life span transitions for a student with ld: Mother–daughter perspectives. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(3), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216644826
6.
EisenmanL. T.ChamberlinM. (2001). Implementing self-determination activities: Lessons from schools. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200302
7.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728808317658
8.
HooverR. S.KoerberA. L. (2011). Using NVivo to answer the challenges of qualitative research in professional communication: Benefits and best practices. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2009.2036896
LichtmanM. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A users guide (3rd ed.). SAGE.
12.
LindnerK. T.SchwabS. (2020). Differentiation and individualization in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450
13.
LoboB. J.Burke-SmalleyL. A. (2018). An empirical investigation of the financial value of a college degree. Education Economics, 26(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1332167
14.
LyonsN.LaBoskeyV. K. (2002). Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching. Teachers College Press.
15.
MadausJ. W.GelbarN.DukesL. L.TaconetA.Faggella-LubyM. (2021). Are there predictors of success for students with disabilities pursuing postsecondary education?Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(4), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420976526
16.
McCallZ. A. (2015). The transition experiences, activities, and supports of four college students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414537679
17.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
18.
MooreM.McNaughtJ. (2014). Virginia’s self-determination project: Assisting students with disabilities to become college and career ready. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140690
19.
NewmanL. A.MadausJ. W.LalorA. R.JavitzH. S. (2018). Support receipt: Effect on postsecondary success of students with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418811288
20.
RojewskiJ. W.LeeI. H.GreggN. (2015). Causal effects of inclusion on postsecondary education outcomes of individuals with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25(4), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207313505648
21.
RoseS. (2013). The value of a college degree. Change, 45(6), 24–32.
22.
RoulstonK. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. SAGE.
23.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
24.
SaldanaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
25.
ScotchR. K. (2009). “Nothing about us without us”: Disability rights in America. OAH Magazine of History, 23(3), 17–22.
26.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.Garnier VillarrealM.LittleT. (2014). Exploring essential characteristics of self-determination for diverse students using data from nlts2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(3), 168–176.
27.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.LittleT. D. (2014). Autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization: Exploring data on self-determination from NLTS2. Exceptional Children, 80(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291408000206
28.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2017). The impact of personal factors on self-determination and early adulthood outcome constructs in youth with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207316667732
29.
ShogrenK. A.WardM. J. (2018). Promoting and enhancing self-determination to improve the post-school outcomes of people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180935
30.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
31.
ShowersA. H.KinsmanJ. W. (2017). Factors that contribute to college success for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 40(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717690115
32.
SpauldingL. S.PrattS. M. (2015). A review and analysis of the history of special education and disability advocacy in the United States. American Educational History Journal, 42(1), 91–109.
33.
SunH.LiW.ShenB. (2017). Learning in physical education: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0067
34.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
35.
TrainorA. A. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 233–249.
36.
VansteenkisteM.AeltermanN.De MuynckG. J.HaerensL.PatallE.ReeveJ. (2018). Fostering personal meaning and self-relevance: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381067
WisniewskiT.WhiteC.GreenC.ElderA. F.SohelS.PerryN. E.ShapkaJ. D. (2018). Supporting students through role redefinition: A self-determination theory perspective. Education as Change, 22(1), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/3700
40.
WuI.MolinaR. M.Jr. (2019). Self-determination of college students with learning and attention challenges. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 32(4), 359–375.
41.
YuM.NovakJ. A.LaveryM. R.VostalB. R.MatugaJ. M. (2018). Predicting college completion among students with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417750093
