A strengths-based approach to transition assessment and planning can ensure that special education services are person-centered. To better understand the strengths and needs of students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD), we compared the perceptions of students and their teachers from three public high schools. A convergent mixed-methods analysis of transition assessments, interviews, and educational documents revealed significant differences between perspectives. On the Transition Planning Inventory–2, student ratings (n = 8) were higher than teacher ratings (n = 8) on 8 out of 11 domains. Interview transcripts and transition plan documents revealed differences in strengths and needs related to career-related skills, academic subjects and skills, and personal characteristics. Based on these findings, we provide suggestions for further research and implications for practice.
BuchananR.NeseR. N.ClarkM. (2016). Stakeholders’ voices: Defining needs of students with emotional and behavioral disorders transitioning between school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 41(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.17988/BD-15-73.1
2.
BullisM.MoranT.BenzM.TodisB.JohnsonM. (2002). Description and evaluation of the ARIES project. Achieving rehabilitation, individualized education, and employment success for adolescents with emotional disturbance. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25(1), 41–58. http://doi.org/10.1177/088572880202500104
3.
BuntinxW. H. E. (2013). Understanding disability: A strengths-based approach. In WehmeyerM. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 7–18). Oxford University Press.
4.
CarterE. W.BoehmT. L.BiggsE. E.AnnandaleN. H.TaylorC. E.LoockA. K.LiuR. Y. (2015). Known for my strengths. Positive traits of transition-age youth with intellectual disability and/or autism. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(2), 101–119. http://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915592158
5.
CarterE. W.BrockM. E.TrainorA. A. (2014). Transition assessment and planning for youth with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 47(4), 245–255. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912456241
6.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. (2006). Self-determination skills and opportunities of transition-age youth with emotional disturbance and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 333–346. http://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200305
7.
CarterE. W.TrainorA.SunY.OwensL. (2009). Assessing the transition-related strengths and needs of adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(1), 74–94. http://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907600104
8.
CavendishW.ConnorD. (2018). Toward authentic IEPs and transition plans: Student, parent, and teacher perspectives. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(1), 32–43. http://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716684680
9.
CheneyD. (2012). Transition tips for educators working with students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 22–29. http://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212443149
10.
ClarkG. M.PattonJ. R. (2006). Transition Planning Inventory: Administration and resource guide. Pro-Ed.
11.
CreswellJ. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
12.
EpsteinM. H.RudolphS.EpsteinA. A. (2000). Using strengths-based assessment in transition planning. TEACH-ING Exceptional Children, 32(6), 50–54. http://doi.org/10.1177/004005990003200607
13.
FarmerT. (2013). When universal approaches and prevention services are not enough: The importance of understanding the stigmatization of special education for students with EBD: A response to Kauffman and Badar. Journal of Behavioral Disorders, 39(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900105
14.
FlowerA.McKennaJ.HaringC.PazeyB. (2015). School-to-life transition: Perceptions of youth in behavior intervention programs. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(4), 217–226. http://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.917602
15.
GreeneG. (2011). Transition planning for culturally and linguistically diverse youth. Brookes.
16.
HennesseyM.TerryR.MartinJ.McConnellA.WillisD. (2018). Factor structure and basic psychometric properties of the transition assessment and goal generator. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(2), 99–110. http://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417691021
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2018). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (11th ed.). Pearson.
19.
LeakeD.BooneR. (2007). Multicultural perspectives on self-determination from youth, parent, and teacher focus groups. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30(2), 104–115. http://doi.org/10.1177/08857288070300020101
20.
LipscombS.HalmsonJ.LieuA. Y.BurghardtJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. (2017). Findings from the national longitudinal transition study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across disability groups. Full Report. Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174016/
21.
MalloyJ.SundarV.HagnerD.PieriasL.VietT. (2010). The efficacy of the RENEW model: Individualized school-to-career services for youth at risk of school dropout. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 15(1), 19–26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ942876
22.
McDonaldJ. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House.
23.
MurrayC.ZvochK. (2011). The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610366250
24.
ObiakorF. E.EnwefaS.UtleyC.ObiS. O.Gwalla-OgisiN.EnwefaR. (2004). Serving culturally and linguistically diverse students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.
25.
PrinceA. M.PlotnerA. J.YellM. L. (2014). Postsecondary transition and the courts: An update. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25(1), 41–47. http://doi.org/10.1177/1044207314530469
26.
RehfeldtJ. D.ClarkG. M.LeeS. W. (2012). The effects of using the transition planning inventory and a structured IEP process as a transition planning intervention on IEP meeting outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 33(1), 48–58. http://doi.org/10.1177/074193510366038
27.
RoweD.MazzottiV.HiranoK.AlversonC. (2015). Assessing transition skills in the 21st century. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 47(6), 301–309. http://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915587670
28.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
29.
SandersonK. A.GoldmanS. E. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to increase adolescent IEP meeting participation. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(3), 157–168. http://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420922552
30.
StigerT. R.KosinskiA. S.BarnhartH. X.KleinbaumD. G. (1998). ANOVA for repeated ordinal data with small sample size? A comparison of ANOVA, MANOVA, WLS, and Gee methods by simulation. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 27(2), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919808813485
31.
TestD.MazzottiV.MustianA.FowlerC.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. http://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960
32.
TrainorA. A. (2007). Perceptions of adolescent girls with LD regarding self-determination and postsecondary transition planning. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(1), 31–45. http://doi.org/10.2307/30035514
33.
TrainorA. A. (2008). Using cultural and social capital to improve postsecondary outcomes and expand transition models for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 148–162. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907313346
34.
TrainorA. A.CarterE. W.KarpurA.MartinJ. E.MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E.NewmanL.RojewskiJ. W. (2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future study. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Children, 43(1), 5–17. http://doi.org/10.177/2165143419864551
35.
TrainorA. A.GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. http://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100
36.
TrainorA. A.MorningstarM.MurrayA. (2016). Characteristics of transition planning and Services for students with high-incidence disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(2), 113–124. http://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607348
37.
WagnerM.NewmanL. (2012). Longitudinal transition outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35(3), 199–208. http://doi.org/10.2975/35.3.2012.199.208
38.
Williams-DiehmK.PalmerS.LeeY.SchroerH. (2010). Goal content analysis for middle and high school students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(3), 132–142. http://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810380230
39.
WoodsL.SylvesterL.MartinJ. (2010). Student-directed transition planning: Increasing student knowledge and self-efficacy in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 106–114. http://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810368056
40.
ZolkoskiS. M.BullockL. M.GableR. A. (2016). Factors associated with student resilience: Perspectives of graduates of alternative education programs. Preventing School Failure, 60(3), 231–243. http://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2015.1101677
