This article synthesizes policy and intervention options for youth with disabilities based on recent reports from the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the Department of Labor Office of Disability Employment Policy. To frame findings from both reports, we utilize a life course approach. This approach is important as youth’s needs for supports change as they age, particularly as they prepare to transition from school to the adult world. Our summary highlights potential challenges and then describes promising education and employment interventions. An important theme is the importance of cross-agency collaboration. There is a particular need for a more cohesive, long-term strategy to address gaps in fragmented services to develop the necessary evidence to enhance the long-term outcomes.
AlwinD. (2012). Integrating varieties of life course concepts. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 67, 206–220. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr146
2.
BraddockD.HempR.TanisE. S.WuJ.HafferL. (2015). State of the states in intellectual and developmental disabilities (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
FrakerT.ArifM.HoneycuttT.ThompkinsA.ValentineE. J. (2014). Final report on the youth transition demonstration evaluation. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
6.
FrakerT.CarterE. W.HoneycuttT.KauffJ.LivermoreG.MamunA. (2014). Promoting Readiness of Minors in SSI (PROMISE) evaluation design report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
7.
FrakerT.MamunA.TimminsL. (2015). Three-year impacts of services and work incentives on youth with disabilities. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
8.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). Federal disability assistance: Wide array of programs needs to be examined in light of 21st century challenges (GAO-05-0626). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05626.pdf
9.
HalfonN.HoutrowA.LarsonK.NewacheckP. W. (2012). The changing landscape of disability in childhood. Future of Children, 22, 13–42.
10.
HockH.LucaD.KautzT.StapletonD. (2017, February22). Improving the outcomes of youth with medical limitations through comprehensive training and employment services: Evidence from the National Job Corps study (Working Paper 53). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
11.
HoneycuttT.WittenburgD.CraneK.LevereM.LueckingR.StapletonD. (2018). SSI youth formative research project: Considerations for identifying promising and testable interventions (Final report submitted to the Office of Disability Employment Policy). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
12.
LipscombS.HaimsonJ.LiuA. Y.BurghardtJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. L. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across disability groups (NCEE 2017-4018). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
13.
LivermoreG.GoodmanN. (2009). A review of recent evaluation efforts associated with programs and policies designed to promote the employment of adults with disabilities. Ithaca, NY: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Employment Policy for Persons with Disabilities.
14.
MamunA. A.TimminsL.StapletonD. C. (2016). Prospects for an impact evaluation of Project SEARCH: An evaluability assessment. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
15.
MartinJ. E.van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316. doi:10.1177/001440290607200303
16.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsM. E.ShearerM. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 196–215. doi:10.1177/2165143415588047
17.
MorningstarM. E.KurthJ. A.JohnsonP. E. (2017). Examining national trends in educational placements for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 3–12. doi:10.1177/0741932516678327
18.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Mental disorders and disabilities among low-income children. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
19.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Opportunities for improving programs and services for children with disabilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25028
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school (A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2; NCSER 2011-3005]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
23.
Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2016). Vocational rehabilitation services and supported employment services programs: Federal FY 2017 monitoring and assistance guide. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
24.
ReynoldsM. C.GottoG. S.ArnoldC.BoehmT. L.MagañaS.DinoraP.. . . ShaffertR. (2015). National goals for supporting families across the life course. Inclusion, 3, 260–266. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-3.4.260
25.
ShiL.SinghD. A. (2014). Delivering health care in America. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
26.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.BurkeK. M.PalmerS. B. (2017). The self-determination learning model of instruction: Teacher’s guide. Lawrence: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
27.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733
28.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859
29.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
30.
WehmanP.CarolS.McDonoughJ.MolinelliA.RiehleE.HamW.ThissW. (2013). Project SEARCH for youth with autism spectrum disorders: Increasing competitive employment on transition from high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 15, 144–155. doi:10.1177/1098300712459760
WittenburgD.MannD.ThompkinsA. (2013). The disability system and programs to promote employment for people with disabilities. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2, 2–25. doi:10.1186/2193-9004-2-4
33.
World Health Organization. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health: Children and youth version. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
