Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93 – 112 as amended, 29 U.S.C. §794.
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. No. 101-336, 42 U.S.C. § 12101.
3.
BarberP. (2012). College students with disabilities: What fac- tors influence successful degree completion? A case study (Disability and work research report). New Brunswick, NJ: John. J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development.
4.
Council for Exceptional Children’s Division on Career Development and Transition. (CEC-DCDT; 2014). The International Division on Career Development and Transition of the International Council for Exceptional Children: Constitution. Article II, Section 4.
5.
DukesL. L.MadausJ. W.Faggella-LubyM.LombardiA.GelbarN. (2017). PASSing College: A taxonomy for students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30, 113–129.
6.
EaganM. K.StolzenbergE. B.ZimmermanH. B.AragonM. C.Whang SaysonH.Rios-AguilarC. (2015). The American freshman: National norms fall 2015. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from https://www.heri.ucla.edu/briefs/TheAmericanFreshman2015-Brief.pdf
7.
GrigalM.HartD.WeirC. (2013). Postsecondary education for people with intellectual disability: Current issues and critical challenges. Inclusion, 1, 50–63.
8.
HendersonC. (1999). College freshmen with disabilities: Statistical year 1998. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
9.
Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, Public Law 110-315. (2008).
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 § et seq. (2004).
12.
MadausJ. W.ShawS. F.DukesL. L.III. (2011). Introduction. In ShawS. F.MadausJ. W.DukesL. L., III (Eds.), Preparing students with disabilities for college success: A practical guide to transition planning (pp. 1–6). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
MadausJ. W.GelbarN. W.DukesL.L.LalorA. R.LombardiA.KowittJ.Faggella-LubyM. (2018). Literature on Postsecondary Disability Services: A Call for Research Guidelines. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(2), 133-145. doi:10.1037/dhe0000045
14.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 196–215.
15.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2010_09/nlts2_report_2010_09_complete.pdf
16.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA. M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20113005/pdf/20113005.pdf
17.
RaueK.LewisL. (2011). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93 – 112 as amended, 29 U.S.C. §794.
19.
SniateckiJ. L.PerryH. B.SnellL. H. (2014). Faculty attitudes and knowledge regarding college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28, 259–275.
20.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
21.
Think College. (2016). College options for people with intellectual disabilities. Boston: Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston.