This study confirmed the reliability and validity of the Quality Indicators of Exemplary Transition Programs Needs Assessment–2 (QI-2). Quality transition program indicators were identified through a systematic synthesis of transition research, policies, and program evaluation measures. To verify reliability and validity of the QI-2, we administered rigorous methods including a content analysis, an expert review, and instrument field test. Forty-seven indicators were categorized into seven domains: (a) transition planning, (b) transition assessment, (c) family involvement, (d) student involvement, (e) transition-focused curriculum and instruction, (f) interagency collaboration, and (g) systems-level infrastructure. The QI-2 was found to be reliable and valid for use by transition stakeholders, districts, and states for evaluating quality of transition programs and identifying areas for program improvement.
AlwellM.CobbB. (2006). A systematic review of the effects of curricular interventions on the acquisition of functional life skills by youth with disabilities (What Works Transition Research Synthesis). Retrieved from http://nsttac.org/content/what-works-transition-research-synthesis
2.
BaerR. M.DavisoA.IIIMcMahan QueenR.FlexerR. W. (2011). Disproportionality in transition services: A descriptive study. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 172–185.
3.
BaerR. M.FlexerR. W.BechS.AmstutzN.HoffmanL.BrothersJ.. . . ZechmanC. (2003). A collaborative followup study on transition service utilization and post-school outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 7–25.
4.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.UnruhD.WaintrupM. (2004). Sustaining secondary transition programs in local schools. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 39–50.
5.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
6.
BooneR. (1992). Involving culturally diverse parents in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 15, 205–221.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
BuiY. N.TurnbullA. (2003). East meets west: Analysis of person-centered planning in the context of Asian American values. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–31.
11.
BullisM.DavisC.BullB.JohnsonB. (1995). School-to-community transition experiences of young adults who are deaf: What variables relate to success?Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 130–150.
12.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 50–63.
13.
CarterE. W.TrainorA. A.CakirogluO.ColeO.SwedeenB.DitchmanN.OwensL. (2009). Exploring school-employer partnerships to expand career development and early work experiences for youth with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 145–159.
14.
ChoS.GannottiM. E. (2005). Korean-American mothers’ perception of professional support in early intervention and special education programs. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 2, 1–9.
15.
ChristensonS. L.ThurlowM. L. (2004). School dropouts: Prevention considerations, interventions, and challenges. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 36–39.
16.
CobbB.AlwellM. (2009). Transition planning/coordinating interventions for youth with disabilities: A systematic reviewCareer Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 70–81.
17.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative meta-synthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114.
18.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
DevellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
21.
FowlerF. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
GeenenS.PowersL. E.Lopez-VasquezA. (2005). Barriers against and strategies for promoting the involvement of culturally diverse parents in school-based transition planning. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 27(3), 4–14.
23.
GreenS. B.SalkindN. L. (2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
24.
HetheringtonS. A.Durant-JonesL.JohnsonK.NolanK.SmithE.Taylor-BrownS.TuttleJ. (2010). The lived experiences of adolescents with disabilities and their parents in transition planning. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 163–172.
25.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §1401.
26.
KeyesM. W.Owens-JohnsonL. (2003). Developing person-centered IEPs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38, 145–152.
27.
KohlerP. D. (1993). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied?Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 107–121.
28.
KohlerP. D. (1996). Taxonomy for transition programming: Linking research and practice. Champaign: Transition Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
29.
KohlerP. D.RuschF. R. (1996). Secondary education programs and transition perspectives. In WangM. C.ReynoldsM. C.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Handbook of special and remedial education: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 107-130). Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science.
30.
MahonM. J.BullockC. C. (1992). Teaching adolescents with mild mental retardation to make decisions in leisure through the use of self-control techniques. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 26, 9–26.
MenchettiB. M.GarciaL. A. (2003). Personal and employment outcomes of person-centered career planning. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 145–156.
33.
MichaelsC. A.FerraraD. L. (2005). Promoting post-school success for all: The role of collaboration in person-centered transition planning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16, 287–313.
34.
MiglioreA.MankD.GrossiT.RoganP. (2007). Integrated employment or sheltered workshops: Preferences of adults with intellectual disabilities, their families, and staff. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 5–19.
35.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
MooreR. J.CartledgeG.HeckamanK. (1995). The effects of social skill instruction and self-monitoring on game-related behaviors of adolescents with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 253–266.
37.
MorningstarM. E. (2006). Quality indicators of exemplary transition programs needs assessment instrument. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
38.
MorningstarM. E.Clavenna-DeaneE. (2014). Preparing secondary special educators and transition specialist. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris-KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation. Florence, KY: Routledge.
39.
MorningstarM. E.EricksonA. G.LattinD. L.LeeH. (2012). Quality indicators of exemplary transition programs. Lawrence: Department of Special Education, University of Kansas.
40.
MorningstarM. E.FreyB. B.NoonanP. M.NgJ.Clavenna-DeaneB.GravesP.. . . Williams-DiehmK. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 80–94.
41.
MorningstarM. E.TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (1995). What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family involvement in the transition from school to adult life?Exceptional Children, 62, 249–260.
42.
MurawskiW. W.HughesC. E. (2009). Response to intervention, collaboration, and co-teaching: A logical combination for successful systemic change. Preventing School Failure, 53, 267–277.
43.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
44.
NameyE.GuestG.ThairuL.JohnsonL. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In GuestG.MacQueenK. M. (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–162). Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press.
45.
National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. (2011). Parent/professional collaboration topic. Minneapolis: Institute for Community Integration, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.ncset.org/topics/family/default.asp?topic=29
46.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center. (2013). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition: What we know and what we still need to know. Charlotte, NC: Author.
47.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
48.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
49.
NoonanP. M.MorningstarM. E.EricksonA. G. (2008). Improving interagency collaboration: Effective strategies used by high-performing local districts and communities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 132–143.
50.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416.
51.
StoddenR. A.LeakeD. W. (1994). Getting to the core of transition: A re-assessment of old wine in new bottles. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 65–76.
52.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.MazzottiV.WhiteJ.WalkerA. R.. . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128.
53.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL. J.KohlerP. H. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
54.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
ToddT.ReidG. (2006). Increasing physical activity in individuals with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 167–176.
56.
Van ReusenA. K.BosC. S.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1994). The self-advocacy strategy for educational and transition planning. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
57.
WalkerA.BartholomewA. (2012). Student development: Employment skills. In TestD.W. (Ed.), Evidence-based instructional strategies for transition (pp. 79–95). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
58.
WehmeyerM. L.LawrenceM.KelchnerK.PalmerS.GarnerN.SoukupJ. (2004). Whose future is it anyway? A student directed transition planning process (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Beach Center on Disability.
59.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
60.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK. L.LittleT. D.BoultonA. (2012). The impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78, 135–153.
61.
WolgemuthJ. R.CobbR. B.DuganJ. J. (2007). The effects of self-management interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.
