An increased focus on expanding and synthesizing the transition evidence base, while important, should be supplemented with research highlighting the lived experiences of young adults with disabilities as they move from high school to adult roles. This study documents the experiences of four successful college students with varied disabilities (i.e., learning disability, blind, hearing impairment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). Analysis derived from a series of in-depth phenomenological interviews highlighted a range of informal transition supports they utilized in their transitions (e.g., self-advocacy, family support, inclusive high school programming), but just one participant described comprehensive and coordinated transition supports. Discussion topics include suggestions for transition teachers to better utilize students’ informal supports.
AberyB. H.StancliffeR. J. (2003). An ecological theory of self-determination: Theoretical foundations. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB. H.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. J. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 25–42). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
2.
BaerR. M.FlexerR. W.BeckS.AmstutzN.HoffmanL.BrothersJ.. . . ZechmanC. (2003). A collaborative followup study on transition service utilization and post-school outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 7–25.
3.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509−541.
4.
BogdanR.TaylorS. J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
6.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 50–63.
7.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. (2006). Self-determination skills and opportunities of transition-age youth with emotional disturbance and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 333–346.
8.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
9.
CookB. G.CookL.LandrumT. J. (2013). Moving research into practice: Can we make implementation stick?Exceptional Children, 79, 163–180.
10.
deFurS. H.Todd-AllenM.GetzelE. E. (2001). Parent participation in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 19–36.
11.
DevliegerP. J.TrachJ. S. (1999). Mediation as a transition process: The impact on postschool employment outcomes. Exceptional Children, 65, 507–523.
12.
DorenB.GauJ. M.LindstromL. E. (2012). The relationship between parent expectations and postschool outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 79, 7–23.
13.
FieldS.SarverM. D.ShawS. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349.
14.
GeenenS.PowersL.Lopez VasquezA.BersaniH. (2003). Understanding and promoting the transition of minority adolescents. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 27–46.
15.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 77–84.
16.
HarryB.AllenN.McLaughlinM. (1995). Communication versus compliance: African-American parents’ involvement in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 364–377.
17.
HermanowiczJ. C. (2013). The longitudinal qualitative interview. Qualitative Sociology, 36, 189–208.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments, P.L. 105-17 (1997).
20.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments, P.L. 108-446 (2004).
21.
JamesonD. R. (2007). Self-determination and success outcomes of two year college students with disabilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37, 26–46.
KimK.MorningstarM. E. (2005). Transition planning involving culturally and linguistically diverse families. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28, 92–103.
24.
KohlerP. D. (1996). Taxonomy for transition programming: Reflecting on transition-focused education. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
25.
KohlerP. D.FieldS. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 174–183.
26.
KuriyanA. B.PelhamW. E.Jr.MolinaB. S. G.WaschbuschD. A.GnagyE. M.SibleyM. H. . .KentK. M. (2013). Young adult educational and vocational outcomes of children diagnosed with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 27–41.
27.
LightnerK. L.Kipps-VaughanD.SchulteT.TriceA. D. (2012). Reasons university students with a learning disability wait to seek disability services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25, 145–159.
28.
LindstromL.DorenB.MethenyJ.JohnsonP.ZaneC. (2007). Transition to employment: Role of the family in career development. Exceptional Children, 73, 348–366.
29.
LindstromL.DorenB.MieschJ. (2011). Waging a living: Career development and long-term employment outcomes for young adults with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77, 423–434.
30.
MartinJ. E.Williams-DiehmK. (2013). Student engagement and leadership of the transition planning process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 43–50.
31.
MorningstarM. M.FreyB. B.NoonanP. M.NgJ.Clavenna-DeaneB.GravesP.. . .WilliamsD. K. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 80–94.
32.
MorningstarM. M.TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R.III. (1995). What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family participation in transition from school to adult life?Exceptional Children, 62, 249–260.
33.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school [A Report From the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS-2)]. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
34.
PalmerC.RoesslerR. T. (2000). Requesting classroom accommodations: Self-advocacy and conflict resolution training for college students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 38–43.
35.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
ShandraC. L.HoganD. P. (2008). School-to-work program participation and the post-high school employment of young adults with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 29, 117–130.
37.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career and Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128.
38.
TestD. W.MasonC.HughesC.KonradM.NealeM.WoodW. M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 391–412.
39.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
40.
ThomaC. A.GetzelE. E. (2005). “Self-determination is what it’s all about”: What post-secondary students with disabilities tell us are important considerations for success. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 234–242.
41.
TuffordL.NewmanP. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 80–96.
42.
U.S. Department of Education. (2012). 31st annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2009. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.JavitzH.ValdesK. (2012). A national picture of parent and youth participant in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 140–155.
45.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS-2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
46.
WalkerA. R.TestD. W. (2011). Using a self-advocacy intervention on African American college students’ ability to request academic accommodations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 134–144.
47.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
48.
WhiteJ.WeinerJ. S. (2004). Influence of least restrictive environment and community based training on integrated employment outcomes for transitioning students with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 21, 149–156.
