Very little systematic research has been conducted on mentoring of youth with disabilities, especially science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) mentoring. This article describes findings from a qualitative study, conducted as a component of an explanatory, sequential mixed-methods investigation of the outcomes and processes of a STEM mentoring intervention for high school–aged youth with disabilities, provided by mentors with and without disabilities. Focus groups were conducted with 30 youth, 30 parents, and 28 mentors following their participation in a randomized trial of a mentoring intervention. Key themes include the benefits of mentoring for STEM career development, especially for older youth; the importance of relationship development, encouraging guidance, and participation in experiential activities; and personality and interest compatibility in successful mentor–mentee matching.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2002, June). New career paths for students with disabilities: Opportunities for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–44). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
4.
BellE. C. (2012). Mentoring transition-age youth with blindness. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 170–179. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466910374211
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
DuBoisD. L.PortilloN.RhodesJ. E.SilverthornN.ValentineJ. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 57–91. doi:10.1177/1529100611414806
9.
HernandezB. (2005). A voice in the chorus: Perspectives of young men of color on their disabilities, identities, and peer-mentors. Disability & Society, 20, 117–133. doi:10.1080/09687590500059051
10.
HibbardM. R.CantorJ.CharatzH.RosenthalR.AshmanT.GundersenN.GartnerA. (2002). Peer support in the community: Initial findings of a mentoring program for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their families. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 112–131.
11.
LeddyM. H. (2012, June). Postsecondary students with disabilities in STEM: Degree choices, retention and career options. Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the ORAU Council of Sponsoring Institutions, Oak Ridge, TN. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/orau/mark-leddy#btnNext
12.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
13.
MocciaR. E.SchumakerJ. B.HazelJ. S.VernonD. S.DeshlerD. D. (1989). A mentor program for facilitating the life transitions of individuals who have handicapping conditions. Reading, Writing, and Disabilities International, 5, 177–195. doi:10.1080/0748763890050206
14.
MuhrT. (2004). User’s manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. Berlin, Germany: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.
15.
NagleK.MarderC.SchillerE. (2009). Research in disabilities education program evaluation: Study 1 methods and evaluation. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
16.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering digest: 2011 (NSF 11–309). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf11309.pdf
17.
PowersL. E.SowersJ.StevensT. (1995). An exploratory, randomized study of the impact of mentoring on the self-efficacy and community-based knowledge of adolescents with severe physical challenges. Journal of Rehabilitation, 61, 33–41.
18.
RhodesJ. E.ReddyR.GrossmanJ. B.LeeJ. M. (2002). Volunteer mentoring relationships with minority youth: An analysis of same- versus cross-race matches. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2114–2133. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02066.x
19.
SowersJ.KellerT.SchmidtJ.TurnerA.SalazarA.PowersL. E. (2013). Engaging students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: A Randomized Trial of a STEM Mentoring Program. Manuscript in preparation.
20.
SowersJ.PowersL. E.ShpigelmanC.-N. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) mentoring for youth and young adults with disabilities: A review of the research [Monograph]. Portland, OR: Regional Research Institute on Human Services, Portland State University.
21.
StumboN. J.MartinJ. K.NordstromD.RolfeT.BurgstahlerS.WhitneyJ.. . . MisquezE. (2010). Evidence-based practices in mentoring students with disabilities: Four case studies. Journal of Science Education for Students With Disabilities, 14, 33–54. Retrieved from http://library.rit.edu/oajournals/index.php/jsesd/article/view/339
