This position paper describes the Division of Career Development and Transition’s stance and recommendations for identifying and promoting secondary transition evidence-based practices and predictors of postschool success for students with disabilities. Recommendations for experimental research, correlational research, and secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 data are provided. Finally, suggestions related to planning for future research in the area of secondary transition are discussed.
BaerR. M.DavisoA. W.IIIFlexerR. W.QueenR. M.MeindlR. S. (2011). Students with intellectual disabilities: Predictors of transition outcomes. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 134–141. doi:10.1177/0885728811399090
2.
BakerS. K.ChardD. J.Ketterline-GellerL. R.ApichatabutraC.DoablerC. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75, 303–318.
3.
BerlinerD. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researchers, 31(8), 18–20.
4.
BouckE. C.JoshiG. S. (2012). Functional curriculum and students with mild intellectual disabilities: Exploring postschool outcomes through the NLTS2. Education and Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 47, 139–153.
5.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
6.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
7.
CarterE. W.BrockM. E.Bottema-BeutelK.BartholomewA.BoehmT. L.Cease-CookJ. (2013). Methodological trends in secondary education and transition research: Looking backward and moving forward. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 15–24.
8.
CookB. G.CookL.LandrumT. J. (2013). Moving research into practice: Can we make dissemination stick?Exceptional Children, 79, 163–180.
9.
CookB. G.OdomS. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144.
10.
FabianE.LentR.WillisS. (1998). Predicting work transition outcomes for students with disabilities: Implications for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 311–316.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
13.
HalpernA. S. (1985). Transition: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 51, 479–486.
14.
HalpernA. S. (1992). Transition: New wine in old bottles. Exceptional Children, 58, 202–211.
15.
HarnB.ParisiD.StoolmillerM. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools?Exceptional Children, 79, 181–193.
16.
HarveyM. W. (2002). Comparison and postsecondary transitional outcomes between students with and without disabilities by secondary vocational education participation: Findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 99–122.
17.
HockenburyJ. C.KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (2000). What is right about special education. Exceptionality, 8, 3–11.
18.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. No.108-446, 20 U.S.C. (2004)
20.
Innes-HelselF. K.HitchcockJ. H.MillerG.MalinowA.MurrayE. (April7–11, 2006). Identifying evidence-based, promising and emerging practices that use screen-based and calculator technology to teach mathematics in grades K-12: A research synthesis. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
21.
KellemsR.UnruhD. (2011). Statewide longitudinal data systems and Indicator 14: What you need to know. Eugene: National Post-School Outcomes Center, University of Oregon.
22.
KlingnerJ. K.BoardmanA. G.McMasterK. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices?Exceptional Children, 79, 195–211.
23.
KohlerP. D. (1996). A taxonomy for transition programming: Linking research and practice. Champaign: University of Illinois, Transition Research Institute.
24.
KohlerP. D. (1998). Implementing a transition perspective of education. In RuschF.ChadseyJ. (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 179–205). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25.
KohlerP. D.FieldS. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 174–183.
26.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75, 321–340.
27.
MadausJ. W.GelbarN. W.DukesL. L.Fagella-LubyM.LalorA. R.KowittJ. S. (2013). Thirty-five years of transition topics: A review of CDTEI issues from 1978-2012. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 1–8.
28.
McDonnellJ.O’NeillR. (2003). A perspective on single/within subject research methods and scientifically based research. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 138–142.
29.
MorningstarM. E.KnollmanG.SemonS.Kleinhammer-TramillJ. (2012). Accountability for what matters: Using postschool outcomes to build school and community renewal. In BurrelloL. C.SailorW.Kleinhammer-TramillJ. (Eds.), Unifying educational systems: Leadership and policy perspectives (pp. 158–167). Florence, KY: Routledge, Taylor & Frances Group.
30.
MorseJ.RichardsL. (2002). Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school (A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf.
32.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD. . . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school (A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/
33.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
34.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
35.
OdomS. L.CoxA. W.BrockM. E. & the National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders. (2013). Implementation science, professional development, and autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 79, 233–251.
36.
RepettoJ. B.WebbK. W.GarvanC. W.WashingtonT. (2002). Connecting student outcomes with transition practices in Florida. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 123–139.
37.
RuschF. R.SzymanskiE.Chadsey-RuschJ. (1992). The emerging field of transition services. In RuschF.DeStefanoL.Chadsey-RuschJ.PhelpsL. A.SzymanskiE. (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Models, linkages, and policy (pp. 5–17). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.
38.
SanfordC.NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M.ShaverD. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school (Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, NCSER 2011-3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/.
39.
SingerG. H. S. (2000). Special education research agenda in the United States: Sources of influence. Exceptionality, 8, 235–246.
40.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2003). Scientifically based research in education and students with low incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 117–125.
41.
TestD. W.CarterE. W.BaerR. M.MorningstarM. (2012, April). Research in secondary transition: Where are we now and where should we be going?Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children 2012. Denver, CO: Annual Convention and Expo.
42.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS.WhiteJ. A.MazzottiV. L.WalkerA. R. . . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128.
43.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL. J.KohlerP. H. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
44.
ThompsonB.DiamondK. E.McWilliamR.SnyderP.SnyderS. W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71, 181–194.
45.
TrainorA. A.LindstromL.Simon-BurroughsM.MartinJ. E.SorrellsA. M. (2008). From marginalized to maximized opportunities for diverse youths with disabilities: A position paper of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 56–64. doi:10.1177/0885728807313777
46.
TwymanJ. S.SotaM. (2008). Identifying research-based practices for response to intervention: Scientifically based instruction. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 9, 86–101.
47.
UngerD. D.RumrillP. D. (2013). An assessment of publication productivity in career development and transition for exceptional individuals: 1978–2012. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36,25–30.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities (A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/nlts2_report_2005_04_complete.pdf
50.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.JavitzH.ValdesK. (2012). A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1044207311425384
51.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.GarzaN. (2006). An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_08/nlts2_report_2006_08_complete.pdf.
52.
WehmanP. (1992). Transition for young people with disabilities: Challenges for the 1990s. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 112–118.
53.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2008). WWC study review standards. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/documentsum.aspx?sid=19
54.
WillM. (1984). OSERS programming for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
