Under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), transition needs and services are to be discussed as part of the Individual Education Program (IEP) planning process, and decisions based on students’ future goals are to be documented in the IEP. These transition requirements were included in IDEA in order to plan with the student, family, school, and agencies; assist students to see the path to the future; and increase their success post high school. In this study, 27 secondary teachers received professional development (PD) on the transition components in the IEP. The impact on the inclusion and quality of these components was evaluated using 302 IEPs collected before and after the PD. Preliminary findings show promise in positively affecting the IEP components.
BenitezD. T.MorningstarM. E.FreyB. B. (2009). A multistate survey of special education teachers’ perceptions of their transition competencies. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 6–16. doi:10.1177/0885728808323945
2.
BirmanB. F.DesimoneL.PorterA. C.GaretM. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57, 28–33.
3.
BorkoH. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
4.
BuysseV.SparkmanK. L.WesleyP. W. (2003). Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional Children, 69, 263–277.
DorenB.FlanneryK. B.LombardiA. R.McGrath-KatoM. (2012). The impact of professional development and student and teacher characteristics on the quality of postsecondary goals. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932512468037
7.
DuFourR. (2004). What is a professional learning community?Educational Leadership, 61, 6–11. doi:10.4135/9781452218991.n8
8.
EversonJ. M.ZhangD.GuilloryJ. D. (2001). A statewide investigation of individualized transition plans in Louisiana. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 37–49. doi:10.1177/088572880102400104
9.
GeenenS. J.PowersL. E. (2006). Transition planning for foster youth. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 28, 4–15.
10.
GrigalM.TestD. W.BeattieJ.WoodW. M. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 63, 357–372.
11.
Individuals With Disabilities Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
12.
LandmarkL. J.ZhangD. (2012). Compliance and practices in transition planning: A review of individualized education program documents. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932511431831
13.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. R.KelleyK. R.TestD. W.FowlerC. H.KohlerP. D.KorteringL. J. (2009). Linking transition assessment and post-secondary goals: Key elements in the secondary transition planning process. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(2), 44–51.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data, 2010-2011 [Database]. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/
15.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center. (2011). Analysis of 2009-2010 state annual performance reports for indicator 13. Available from http://www.nsttac.org/
16.
PowersK. M.Gil-KashiwabaraE.GeenenS. J.PowersL.BalandranJ.PalmerC. (2005). Mandates and effective transition planning practices reflected in IEPs. Career Development of Exceptional Individuals, 28, 47–59. doi:10.1177/08857288050280010701
17.
SchummJ. S.VaughnS. (1995). Meaningful professional development in accommodating students with disabilities lessons learned. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 344–354. doi:10.1177/074193259501600604
18.
ShrinerJ. G.DestefanoL. (2003). Participation and accommodation in state assessment: The role of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 69, 147–161.
19.
SteeleR. B.KonradM.TestD. W. (2005). An evaluation of IEP transition components and post-school outcomes in two states. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 27, 4–18.
20.
StormsJ.O’LearyE.WilliamsJ. (2000). Transition requirements: A guide for states, districts, schools, universities and families. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
