Briefings on Hospital Safety. (1995). Special report: Needle stick study.Briefings on Hospital Safety. June Suppl., 1–7.
2.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1998). The National Surveillance System for Hospital Health Care Workers (NaSH). Summary report for data collected from June 1995 through December 1997. Available online at http://www.cdc.gov.
3.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1997a). Evaluation of blunt suture needles in preventing percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers during gynecologic surgical procedures—New York City, March 1993–June 1994.MMWR, 46(2), 25–29.
4.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1997b). Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during phlebotomy procedures. Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993–1995.MMWR, 46(2), 21–29.
5.
CorserW. (1998). Occupational exposure of health care workers to bloodborne pathogens: A proposal for a systematic intervention approach.AAOHN Journal, 46(5), 246–252.
6.
CulverJ. (1997). Preventing transmission of blood-borne pathogens: A compelling argument for effective device-selection strategies.American Journal of Infection Control, 25(5), 430–433.
7.
EnglishJ. (1992). Reported hospital needle stick injuries in relation to knowledge/skill, design, and management problems.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 13(5), 259–264.
8.
EPINet. (1997). Exposure prevention information network (EPINet) data reports. 1993 through 1995, 77 hospitals. International Health Care Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia. http://www.med.Vir-ginia.EDU/~epinet/epinet4.html
9.
GartnerK. (1992). Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospital.American Journal of Infection Control, 20(2), 75–79.
10.
HaiduvenD., DeMaioT., & StevensD. (1992). A five-year study of needle stick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 13(5), 265–271.
11.
HartleyJ., AhmedS., MilkinsR., NaylorG., MonsonJ., & LeeP. (1996). Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen.British Journal of Surgery, 83(8), 1156–1157.
12.
JaggerJ. (1990). Estimated cost of needlestick injuries for six major needled devices.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 11(11), 584–588.
13.
KellyD. (1996). Trends in U.S. patents for needlestick prevention technology.Advances in Exposure Prevention, 2(4), 7–8.
14.
KempenP. (1997). Assessing blunt cannulae as replacements for hypodermic needles during intravenous therapy: Safety and utility.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 18(3), 169–174.
15.
L'EcuyerP., SchwabE., IademarcoE., BarrN., AtonE., & FraserV. (1996). Randomized prospective study of the impact of three needleless intravenous systems on needlestick injury rates.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17, 803–808.
16.
LawrenceL., DelclosG., FelknorS., JohnsonP., FrankowskiR., CooperS., & DavidsonA. (1997). The effectiveness of a needleless intravenous connection system: An assessment by injury rate and user satisfaction.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 18(3), 175–182.
17.
LinnemannC., CannonC., DeRondeM., & LanphearB. (1991). Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 12(4), 214–219.
18.
MacPhersonJ. (1996). The interlink needleless intravenous system did not reduce the number of needlestick injuries in Christchurch hospital operating theatres.New Zealand Medical Journal, 109(1031), 387–388.
19.
MulherinS., RickmanL., & JacksonM. (1996). Initial worker evaluation of a new safety syringe.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 17(9), 593–594.
20.
OrensteinR., ReynoldsL., KarabaicM., LambA., MarkowitzS., & WongE. (1995). Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?American Journal of Infection Control, 23(6), 344–351.
21.
PatelN., & TignorG. (1997). Device-specific sharps injury and usage rates: An analysis by hospital department.American Journal of Infection Control, 25(2), 77–84.
22.
PrinceK., SummersL., & KnightM. (1994). Needleless i.v. therapy: comparing three systems for safety.Nurse Management, 25(3), 80N.
23.
RamseyP., & GlennL. (1996). Nurses' body fluid exposure reporting, HIV testing, and hepatitis B vaccination rates.AAOHN Journal, 44(3), 129–137.
24.
RibnerB., & RibuerB. (1990). An effective educational program to reduce the frequency of needle recapping.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 11(12), 635–638.
25.
RiceD., MacKenzieE. & Associates. (1989). Cost of Injury in the United States: A report to Congress.San Francisco and Balitmore: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California and Injury Prevention Center, The Johns Hopkins University.
26.
RutowskiJ., & PetersonS. (1993). A needleless intravenous system: An effective risk management strategy.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 14(4), 226–227.
27.
SkolnickR., LaRoccaJ., BarbaD., & PaiciusL. (1993). Evaluation and implementation of a needleless intravenous system: Making needlesticks a needless problem.American Journal of Infection Control, 21(1), 39–41.
28.
WhitbyM., SteadP., & NagmanJ. (1991). Needlestick injury: Impact of a recapping device and an associated education program.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 12(4), 220–225.
29.
YassiA., McGillM., & KhokharJ. (1995). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a needleless intravenous access system.American Journal of Infection Control, 23(2), 57–64.
30.
YoungerB., HuntE., RobinsonC., & McLemoreC. (1993). Impact of a shielded safety syringe on needlestick injuries among healthcare workers.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 13(6), 349–353.
31.
ZuckermanA. (1995). Occupational exposure to hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus: A comparative risk analysis.American Journal of Infection Control, 23(5), 286–289.