BennerP. (1991). Writers tell nursing's stories: Nurse authors share writing tips. The American Nurse, 23(1), 27–32.
3.
BergA.O. (1990). Misconduct in science: Does family medicine have a problem?Family Medicine, 22(2), 137–142.
4.
BerkR.N. (1991). Is plagiarism ever insignificant? Editorial. American Journal of Roentgenology, 157(3), 614.
5.
BrinkP.J., & WoodM.J. (1988). Basic steps in planning nursing research: From question to proposal, 3rd Ed.Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
6.
ChopR.M., & SilvaM.C. (1991). Scientific fraud: Definitions, policies, and implications for nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 7(3), 166–171.
7.
HawleyD.J., & JeffersJ.M. (1992). Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24(1), 51–55.
8.
IversonC.I.DanB.B., & GlitmanP. (1989). American Medical Association Manual of Style, 8th ed.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
9.
MarkhamR.H.MarkhamP.T., & Wad-DellM.L. (1989). Ten steps in writing the research paper, 4th ed.New York, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
10.
SagelS.S. (1991). Reply to letter to the editor: Effective audiovisual presentation: Proper citation of sources (Cunningham, J.J.). American Journal of Roentgenology, 157(3), 643–644.
11.
SiwekJ. (1990). Misconduct and misunderstanding. Letter to the editor. Family Medicine, 22(4), 254.