DeauxK. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In HarveyJ.H., IckesW.J., & KiddR.F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol 1) Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 335–352.
2.
DeauxK., & EmswillerT. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80–85.
3.
GalperR.E., & LuckD. (1980). Gender, evaluation, and causal attribution: The double standard is alive and well. Sex Roles, 6, 273–283.
4.
HeilmanM.E. (1980). The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 386–396.
5.
JonesE.E., & DavisK.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In BerkowitzE. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2).New York: Academic Press.
6.
NeugartenD.A., & ShafaritzJ.M. (1980). Sexuality in organizations: Romantic and coercive behaviors at work.Oak Park, Illinois: Moore.
7.
PinesA. (1979). The influence of goals on people's perceptions of a competent woman. Sex Roles, 5, 71–76.
8.
WellsG.L. (1980). Asymmetric attributions for compliance: Reward vs. punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 47–60.
