Reaching workers in small worksites presents economic and access barriers for occupational health nurses. Some barriers can be overcome through strategies based on cultural sensitivity. Day care centers employ young, low income, mostly minority women in settings with few workers onsite at any one center. These settings were used to develop a culturally sensitive approach tested through onsite cardiovascular screening, informal interviews, and discussion of behavior change for better health. The study examined both the impact of the Healthier People Health Risk Appraisal (HPHRA) as a culturally appropriate recruitment strategy to involve a group of child day care workers in a cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening and risk reduction program and the effect of that program on observable CVD measures. Faculty and students from an institution of higher education forged a trust relationship with day care providers at nine day care centers in a large metropolitan area. Cardiovascular health was the impetus for the project because minority populations in the southeastern United States have high heart attack and stroke mortality and morbidity rates. Participation rates in the project increased from 26% of the day care workers in the first year of the project to 73% when long term relationships were built on culturally appropriate strategies. The project's culturally sensitive educational intervention focused on individual risks and lifestyle. Statistical analysis of outcomes of the intervention and personal interviews demonstrated the improvement of cardiovascular status in the day care workers. This psychosocial approach can provide the foundation for culturally sensitive care in larger occupational and community settings.
References
1.
AldanaS.G.JacobsonB.H.HarrisC.J., & KelleyP.L. (1994). Mobile worksite health promotion programs can reduce selected employee health risks. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 35(9), 922–928.
2.
AlexanderJ. (1988). The ideological construction of risk: An analysis of corporate health promotion programs in the 1980s. Social Science and Medicine, 26(5), 559–567.
3.
AllenJ. (1993). Impact of the cholesterol education program for nurses: A pilot program evaluation. Cardiovascular Nursing, 29(1), 1–5.
American Heart Association. (1999a). 1998 heart facts. Dallas, TX: National Center for Cardiovascular Disease Statistics of the American Heart Association.
6.
American Heart Association. (1999b). The AHA names top 10 research advances in 1998. Clinician Reviews, 9(4), 83–86, 89–90.
7.
American Nurses Association. (1992). Nursing's agenda for health care reform. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
AmlerR.W.EvansR.C.JacobsT.A.ScetgajM., & SlighD. (1995). Healthier people, version 41B: The Carter Center of Emory University health risk appraisal program. Atlanta, GA: The Carter Center of Emory University.
9.
BloomfieldR.YoungL.D., & GravesJ. (1993). Racial differences in perceptions concerning hypertension and its consequences. Southern Medical Journal, 86(7), 767–770.
10.
BodenL.I., & CabalH. (1995). Company characteristics and workplace medical testing. American Journal of Public Health, 85(8), 1070–5.
11.
BraithwaiteR.L., & TaylorS.E. (Eds.). (1992). Health issues in the black community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BreslowL. (1996). Social ecological strategies for promotion healthy lifestyles. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 253–257.
13.
BrillP.A.KohlH.W.RogersT.CollingwoodT.R.SterlingC.L., & BlairS.N. (1991). The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and recruitment, retention, and health improvements in a worksite health promotion program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 5(3), 215–221.
14.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1996). Current population surveys: National child care staffing study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
15.
ChrousosG.P., & GoldP.W. (1992). The concept of stress and stress system disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(9), 1244–1252.
16.
Cogwell-AndersonR., & Edward-AndersonK. (1991). Worksite health promotion: The benefits of providing personal health status feedback and education programs to employees. AAOHN Journal, 39(2), 57–61.
17.
EnglerM.M.EnglerM.B.DavidsonD.M., & SlaughterR.E. (1992). Cardiovascular disease prevention: Knowledge and attitudes of graduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(10), 1220–1225.
18.
The Expert Panel. (1988). Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Archives of Internal Medicine, 148, 36–39.
19.
FieldingJ. (1982). Appraising the health of health risk appraisal. American Journal of Public Health, 72(4), 337–340.
20.
FowlerB.A., & Baker-RisnerP. (1994). A health promotion program evaluation in a minority industry. The ABNF Journal, 5(3), 72–76.
21.
GambleV.N. (1997). Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87(11), 1773–1778.
22.
GeisslerE.M. (1994). Pocket guide to cultural assessment. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
23.
GillumR.F. (1996). Epidemiology of hypertension in African American women. American Heart Journal, 131(2), 385–395.
24.
GomelM.OldenburgB.SimpsonJ.M., & OwenN. (1993). Worksite cardiovascular risk reduction: A randomized trial of health risk assessment, education, counseling, and incentives. American Journal of Public Health, 83(9), 1231–1238.
25.
HallA.G.CollinsK.S., & GliedS. (1999). Employer-sponsored health insurance: Implications for minority workers. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
26.
Hill-BaileyP.RukholmE.E.VanderleeR., & HylandJ. (1994). A heart health survey at the worksite: The first step to effective programming. AAOHN Journal, 42(1), 9–14.
27.
Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. (1997). The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI). Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
28.
KamanR.L.LicciardoneJ.C., & HoffmanM.A. (1991). Comparison of health risk prevalence reported in a health risk appraisal and predicted through demographic analysis. American Journal of Health Promotion, 5(5), 378–383.
29.
KreuterM.W., & StretcherV.J. (1995). Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: Results from a randomized trial. Health Psychology, 14(1), 56–63.
30.
KriegerN. (1990). Racial and gender discrimination: Risk factors for high blood pressure?Social Science and Medicine, 30(12), 1273–1281.
31.
MagnusM.H. (1991). Cardiovascular health among African-Americans: A review of the health status, risk reduction, and intervention strategies. American Journal of Health Promotion, 5(4), 282–289.
32.
PaneG.A., & TaliaferoE.H. (1994). Health care cost containment: An overview of policy options. The Annals of Emergency Medicine, 23(1), 103–108.
PenderN.J. (1996). Health promotion in nursing practice (3rd ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
35.
PenderN.J.WalkerS.N., & SechristK.R. (1990). Predicting health-promoting lifestyles in the workplace. Nursing Research, 39(6), 326–332.
36.
Pew Health Professions Commission (1998). Recreating health professions practice for a new century. The fourth report of the Pew Health Professions Commission. San Francisco: Author.
37.
SchneiderD.GreenbergM.R., & LuL.L. (1997). Region of birth and mortality from circulatory diseases among Black Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 87(5), 800–804.
38.
SciaccaJ.SeehaferR.ReedR., & MulvaneyD. (1993). The impact of participation in health promotion on medical costs: A reconsideration of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 7(5), 374–383.
39.
SpectorR.E. (1996). Cultural diversity in health and disease (4th ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
40.
StanhopeM., & LancasterJ. (1996). Community health nursing: Promoting health of aggregates, families, and individuals (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
ThomasS.B., & CurranJ.W. (1999). Tuskegee: From science to conspiracy to metaphor. The American Journal of Medical Sciences, 317(1), 1–4.
43.
USDHHS, Public Health Service. (1991). Healthy people 2000: Objectives for the Nation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
44.
USDHHS, Public Health Service. (1995a). Healthy people 2000: Mid-course review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
45.
USDHHS, Public Health Service. (1995b). Healthy people 2000: Progress report for: Heart disease and stroke. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
46.
USDHHS, Public Health Service. (2000). Healthy people 2010 objectives. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
47.
WoldJ.L., & WilliamsA.M. (1997). Student/faculty practice and research in occupational health: Health promotion and outcome evaluation. AAOHN Journal, 45(2), 76–82.
48.
WrightJ.T.Jr. (1989). Case 4: The black hypertensive patient. In DiPetteD.J. (Ed.), Hypertension: Approaches to the management puzzle (pp. 21–24). Cedar Grove, NJ: Health Scan, Inc.
