The expected increase in age-related health care costs over the coming decades underscores the need to characterize the effects of biological aging in our cells and tissues. Our objective is to use in vivo multiphoton microscopy (MPM) to find endogenous biomarkers of skin aging.
Approach:
MPM was performed on the skin of 2- and 21-month-old mice to measure the autofluorescence of metabolic cofactors, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), and second-harmonic generation signal from collagen. A suite of quantitative biomarkers with sensitivity to age-related changes in bioenergetic demands, mitochondrial organization, and collagen composition and organization was evaluated using these optical sources of contrast.
Results:
An optical redox ratio of FAD/(NADH + FAD) autofluorescence, NADH fluorescence lifetime imaging, and mitochondrial fractal dimension measurements indicated that aged keratinocytes have more fragmented mitochondria that undergo less catabolism of carbon substrates. Analysis of the dermal regions indicated that aged collagen has more nonenzymatic cross-links and has a more fragmented organization.
Innovation:
This study identifies a suite of biomarkers from label-free MPM sensitive to intrinsic aging and provides the first in vivo demonstration of sensitivity to age-dependent metabolic changes in skin through multiple independent optical parameters.
Conclusion:
Our results demonstrate that surrogate markers of metabolic function, mitochondrial organization, collagen cross-linking, and fiber organization are sensitive to a loss of homeostasis with advanced age and may be used in future studies to longitudinally assess the progression of aging.
MacNeeW, RabinovichRA, ChoudhuryG. Ageing and the border between health and disease. Eur Respir J, 2014; 44(5):1332–1352; doi: 10.1183/09031936.00134014
HarmanD. Aging: A theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. Sci Aging Knowl Environ, 2002; 2002(37); doi: 10.1126/sageke.2002.37.cp14
4.
MiwaS, KashyapS, ChiniE, et al.Mitochondrial dysfunction in cell senescence and aging. J Clin Invest, 2022; 132(13):e158447; doi: 10.1172/JCI158447
5.
CheonSY, KimH, RubinszteinDC, et al.Autophagy, cellular aging and age-related human diseases. Exp Neurobiol, 2019; 28(6):643–657; doi: 10.5607/en.2019.28.6.643
6.
KaczanowskiS. Apoptosis: Its origin, history, maintenance and the medical implications for cancer and aging. Phys Biol, 2016; 13(3):031001; doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/13/3/031001
7.
SembaRD, NicklettEJ, FerrucciL. Does accumulation of advanced glycation end products contribute to the aging phenotype? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2010; 65(9):963–975; doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq074
8.
FarageMA, MillerKW, ElsnerP, et al.Characteristics of the aging skin. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2013; 2(1):5–10; doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0356
9.
GeorgakoudiI, QuinnKP. Label-free optical metabolic imaging in cells and tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2023; 25(1):413–443; doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044730
10.
JonesJD, RamserHE, WoessnerAE, et al.In vivo multiphoton microscopy detects longitudinal metabolic changes associated with delayed skin wound healing. Commun Biol, 2018; 1(1):198; doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0206-4
11.
JonesJD, RamserHE, WoessnerAE, et al.Quantifying age-related changes in skin wound metabolism using in vivo multiphoton microscopy. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2020; 9(3):90–102; doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1030
12.
WoessnerAE, WittNJ, JonesJD, et al.Quantification of age-related changes in the structure and mechanical function of skin with multiscale imaging. Geroscience, 2024; 46(5):4869–4882; doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01199-9
13.
KolencOI, QuinnKP. Evaluating cell metabolism through autofluorescence imaging of NAD(P)H and FAD. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2019; 30(6):875–889; doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7451
14.
AlhallakK, RebelloLG, MuldoonTJ, et al.Optical redox ratio identifies metastatic potential-dependent changes in breast cancer cell metabolism. Biomed Opt Express, 2016; 7(11):4364–4374; doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.004364
15.
LiuZ, PouliD, AlonzoCA, et al.Mapping metabolic changes by noninvasive, multiparametric, high-resolution imaging using endogenous contrast. Sci Adv, 2018; 4(3):eaap9302; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9302
16.
QuinnKP, SridharanGV, HaydenRS, et al.Quantitative metabolic imaging using endogenous fluorescence to detect stem cell differentiation. Sci Rep, 2013; 3(1):3432; doi: 10.1038/srep03432
17.
LakowiczJR, SzmacinskiH, NowaczykK, et al.Fluorescence lifetime imaging of free and protein-bound NADH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1992; 89(4):1271–1275; doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1271
18.
FurmanD, AuwerxJ, BulteauA-L, et al.Skin health and biological aging. Nat Aging, 2025; 5(7):1195–1206; doi: 10.1038/s43587-025-00901-6
19.
HeX, GaoX, XieW. Research progress in skin aging, metabolism, and related products. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(21):15930; doi: 10.3390/ijms242115930
20.
XylasJ, QuinnKP, HunterM, et al.Improved Fourier-based characterization of intracellular fractal features. Opt Express, 2012; 20(21):23442–23455; doi: 10.1364/OE.20.023442
21.
VargasI, AlhallakK, KolencOI, et al.Rapid quantification of mitochondrial fractal dimension in individual cells. Biomed Opt Express, 2018; 9(11):5269–5279; doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.005269
22.
XylasJ, VaroneA, QuinnKP, et al.Noninvasive assessment of mitochondrial organization in three-dimensional tissues reveals changes associated with cancer development: Noninvasive Assessment of Mitochondrial Organization. Int J Cancer, 2015; 136(2):322–332; doi: 10.1002/ijc.28992
23.
PouliD, BaluM, AlonzoCA, et al.Imaging mitochondrial dynamics in human skin reveals depth-dependent hypoxia and malignant potential for diagnosis. Sci Transl Med, 2016; 8(367):367ra169; doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2202
24.
MacDonaldDH, HunterM, QuinnKP, et al.Autocorrelation method for fractal analysis in nonrectangular image domains. Opt Lett, 2013; 38(21):4477–4479; doi: 10.1364/OL.38.004477
25.
CampagnolaPJ, DongC‐Y. Second harmonic generation microscopy: Principles and applications to disease diagnosis. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2011; 5(1):13–26; doi: 10.1002/lpor.200910024
26.
LaCombR, NadiarnykhO, CampagnolaPJ. Quantitative second harmonic generation imaging of the diseased state osteogenesis imperfecta: Experiment and simulation. Biophys J, 2008; 94(11):4504–4514; doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114405
27.
LiuZ, QuinnKP, SperoniL, et al.Rapid three-dimensional quantification of voxel-wise collagen fiber orientation. Biomed Opt Express, 2015; 6(7):2294–2310; doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.002294
28.
LiuZ, PouliD, SoodD, et al.Automated quantification of three-dimensional organization of fiber-like structures in biological tissues. Biomaterials, 2017; 116:34–47; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.041
29.
WittNJ, WoessnerAE, HerrmannJ, et al.Mechanical models of collagen networks for understanding changes in the failure properties of aging skin. J Biomech Eng, 2024; 146(7):071002; doi: 10.1115/1.4064406
30.
LynchB, Bonod-BidaudC, DucourthialG, et al.How aging impacts skin biomechanics: A multiscale study in mice. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):13750; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13150-4
31.
WoessnerAE, JonesJD, WittNJ, et al.Three-dimensional quantification of collagen microstructure during tensile mechanical loading of skin. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021; 9:642866; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.642866
32.
LynchB, BancelinS, Bonod-BidaudC, et al.A novel microstructural interpretation for the biomechanics of mouse skin derived from multiscale characterization. Acta Biomater, 2017; 50:302–311; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.051
33.
SherlockBE, HarvestineJN, MitraD, et al.Nondestructive assessment of collagen hydrogel cross-linking using time-resolved autofluorescence imaging. J Biomed Opt, 2018; 23(3):1–9; doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.3.036004
34.
ZhaoHL, ZhangCP, ZhuH, et al.Autofluorescence of collagen fibres in scar. Skin Res Technol, 2017; 23(4):588–592; doi: 10.1111/srt.12375
35.
CsukaEA, WardSC, EkelemC, et al.Reflectance confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and multiphoton microscopy in inflammatory skin disease diagnosis. Lasers Surg Med, 2021; 53(6):776–797; doi: 10.1002/lsm.23386
36.
StrasswimmerJ, PierceMC, ParkBH, et al.Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography of invasive basal cell carcinoma. J Biomed Opt, 2004; 9(2):292–298; doi: 10.1117/1.1644118
37.
GongP, Es’haghianS, HarmsK-A, et al.Optical coherence tomography for longitudinal monitoring of vasculature in scars treated with laser fractionation. J Biophotonics, 2016; 9(6):626–636; doi: 10.1002/jbio.201500157
38.
WanB, GanierC, Du‐HarpurX, et al.Applications and future directions for optical coherence tomography in dermatology. *Br J Dermatol, 2021; 184(6):1014–1022; doi: 10.1111/bjd.19553
39.
HoogedoornL, PeppelmanM, Van De KerkhofPCM, et al.The value of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory and infectious skin diseases: A systematic review. Br J Dermatol, 2015; 172(5):1222–1248; doi: 10.1111/bjd.13499
40.
CentonzeVE, WhiteJG. Multiphoton excitation provides optical sections from deeper within scattering specimens than confocal imaging. Biophys J, 1998; 75(4):2015–2024; doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77643-X
41.
RushmerRF, BuettnerKJK, ShortJM, et al.The skin: The most accessible tissue of the body serves as a potential focus for multidisciplinary research. Science (1979), 1966; 154(3747):343–348; doi: 10.1126/science.154.3747.343
42.
BlairMJ, JonesJD, WoessnerAE, et al.Skin structure–function relationships and the wound healing response to intrinsic aging. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2020; 9(3):127–143; doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1021
43.
GruberF, KremslehnerC, EckhartL, et al.Cell aging and cellular senescence in skin aging — Recent advances in fibroblast and keratinocyte biology. Exp Gerontol, 2020; 130:110780; doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.110780
44.
QuinnKP, SullivanKE, LiuZ, et al.Optical metrics of the extracellular matrix predict compositional and mechanical changes after myocardial infarction. Sci Rep, 2016; 6(1):35823; doi: 10.1038/srep35823
45.
SyedA, LesoineMD, BhattacharjeeU, et al.The number of accumulated photons and the quality of stimulated emission depletion lifetime images. Photochem Photobiol, 2014; 90(4):767–772; doi: 10.1111/php.12248
46.
ZomerHD, TrentinAG. Skin wound healing in humans and mice: Challenges in translational research. J Dermatol Sci, 2018; 90(1):3–12; doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.12.009
47.
LinkKA, PenjweiniR, KnutsonJR. BPS2025 - Ultrafast fluorescence lifetimes of NADH via FLIM. Biophys J, 2025; 124(3):330a; doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.1817
48.
KammlJ, KeC-Y, AcevedoC, et al.The influence of AGEs and enzymatic cross-links on the mechanical properties of collagen fibrils. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2023; 143:105870; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105870
49.
CorstjensH, DicanioD, MuizzuddinN, et al.Glycation associated skin autofluorescence and skin elasticity are related to chronological age and body mass index of healthy subjects. Exp Gerontol, 2008; 43(7):663–667; doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.01.012
50.
DiamantidesN, SlykerL, MartinS, et al.Pre‐glycation impairs gelation of high concentration collagen solutions. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2022; 110(12):1953–1963; doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37431
51.
BarzilaiN, HuffmanDM, MuzumdarRH, et al.The critical role of metabolic pathways in aging. Diabetes, 2012; 61(6):1315–1322; doi: 10.2337/db11-1300
52.
LiuZ, BianX, LuoL, et al.Spatiotemporal single-cell roadmap of human skin wound healing. Cell Stem Cell, 2025; 32(3):479–498.e8; doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.11.013
53.
VaroneA, XylasJ, QuinnKP, et al.Endogenous two-photon fluorescence imaging elucidates metabolic changes related to enhanced glycolysis and glutamine consumption in precancerous epithelial tissues. Cancer Res, 2014; 74(11):3067–3075; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2713
54.
OstranderJH, McMahonCM, LemS, et al.Optical redox ratio differentiates breast cancer cell lines based on estrogen receptor status. Cancer Res, 2010; 70(11):4759–4766; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2572
55.
WalshAJ, CookRS, ManningHC, et al.Optical metabolic imaging identifies glycolytic levels, subtypes, and early-treatment response in breast cancer. Cancer Res, 2013; 73(20):6164–6174; doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0527
56.
GilharA, UllmannY, KarryR, et al.Aging of human epidermis: Reversal of aging changes correlates with reversal of keratinocyte Fas expression and apoptosis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2004; 59(5):411–415; doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.5.B411
57.
LintzeriDA, KarimianN, Blume‐PeytaviU, et al.Epidermal thickness in healthy humans: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2022; 36(8):1191–1200; doi: 10.1111/jdv.18123
58.
PrahlS, KueperT, BiernothT, et al.Aging skin is functionally anaerobic: Importance of coenzyme Q10 for anti aging skin care. Biofactors, 2008; 32(1–4):245–255; doi: 10.1002/biof.5520320129
59.
MarticI, PapaccioF, BelleiB, et al.Mitochondrial dynamics and metabolism across skin cells: Implications for skin homeostasis and aging. Front Physiol, 2023; 14:1284410; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1284410
60.
SreedharA, Aguilera-AguirreL, SinghKK. Mitochondria in skin health, aging, and disease. Cell Death Dis, 2020; 11(6):444; doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2649-z
61.
NavarroA, BoverisA. The mitochondrial energy transduction system and the aging process. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2007; 292(2):C670–C686; doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00213.2006
YaoC-H, WangR, WangY, et al.Mitochondrial fusion supports increased oxidative phosphorylation during cell proliferation. Elife, 2019; 8:e41351; doi: 10.7554/eLife.41351
64.
AgrawalR, HuA, BollagWB. The skin and inflamm-aging. Biology (Basel), 2023; 12(11):1396; doi: 10.3390/biology12111396
65.
BancelinS, AiméC, GusachenkoI, et al.Determination of collagen fibril size via absolute measurements of second-harmonic generation signals. Nat Commun, 2014; 5(1):4920; doi: 10.1038/ncomms5920
66.
GaoJ, GuoZ, ZhangY, et al.Age-related changes in the ratio of Type I/III collagen and fibril diameter in mouse skin. Regen Biomater, 2023; 10:rbac110; doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac110
67.
LovellCR, SmolenskiKA, DuanceVC, et al.Type I and III collagen content and fibre distribution in normal human skin during ageing. Br J Dermatol, 1987; 117(4):419–428; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1987.tb04921.x
68.
MaysP, BishopJ, LaurentG. Age-related changes in the proportion of types I and III collagen. Mech Ageing Dev, 1988; 45(3):203–212; doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(88)90002-4
69.
WuS, LiH, YangH, et al.Quantitative analysis on collagen morphology in aging skin based on multiphoton microscopy. J Biomed Opt, 2011; 16(4):040502; doi: 10.1117/1.3565439
70.
WangH, ShyrT, FevolaMJ, et al.Age-related morphological changes of the dermal matrix in human skin documented in vivo by multiphoton microscopy. J Biomed Opt, 2018; 23(3):1–4; doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.3.030501
71.
YasuiT, TakahashiY, FukushimaS, et al.Observation of dermal collagen fiber in wrinkled skin using polarization-resolved second-harmonic-generation microscopy. Opt Express, 2009; 17(2):912–923; doi: 10.1364/OE.17.000912
72.
FisherGJ, QuanT, PurohitT, et al.Collagen fragmentation promotes oxidative stress and elevates matrix metalloproteinase-1 in fibroblasts in aged human skin. Am J Pathol, 2009; 174(1):101–114; doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080599
73.
SloserisD, FordeNR. AGEing of collagen: The effects of glycation on collagen’s stability, mechanics and assembly. Matrix Biol, 2025; 135:153–160; doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2024.12.007
74.
KuehneA, HildebrandJ, SoehleJ, et al.An integrative metabolomics and transcriptomics study to identify metabolic alterations in aged skin of humans in vivo. BMC Genomics, 2017; 18(1):169; doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3547-3
75.
HeT, FisherGJ, KimAJ, et al.Age-related changes in dermal collagen physical properties in human skin. PLoS One, 2023; 18(12):e0292791; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292791
76.
BaluM, MazharA, HayakawaCK, et al.In vivo multiphoton NADH fluorescence reveals depth-dependent keratinocyte metabolism in human skin. Biophys J, 2013; 104(1):258–267; doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3809
77.
KönigK, BreunigHG, BatistaA, et al.Translation of two-photon microscopy to the clinic: Multimodal multiphoton CARS tomography of in vivo human skin. J Biomed Opt, 2020; 25(1):1–12; doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.1.014515
78.
FastA, LalA, DurkinAF, et al.Fast, large area multiphoton exoscope (FLAME) for macroscopic imaging with microscopic resolution of human skin. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):18093; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75172-9
79.
MontgomeryKL, NovoaRA, KoJM, et al.Handheld multiphoton and pinhole-free reflectance confocal microscopy enables noninvasive, real-time cross-sectional imaging in skin. Sci Rep, 2024; 14(1):26129; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76908-7
80.
KoehlerMJ, KönigK, ElsnerP, et al.In vivo assessment of human skin aging by multiphoton laser scanning tomography. Opt Lett, 2006; 31(19):2879–2881; doi: 10.1364/OL.31.002879
81.
KönigK. Multimodal multiphoton tomography with a compact femtosecond fiber laser. Jopr, 2023; 1(2):51–58; doi: 10.47852/bonviewJOPR32021730
82.
SkalaMC, RichingKM, Gendron-FitzpatrickA, et al.In vivo multiphoton microscopy of NADH and FAD redox states, fluorescence lifetimes, and cellular morphology in precancerous epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007; 104(49):19494–19499; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708425104
83.
JonesJD, RodriguezMR, QuinnKP. Automated extraction of skin wound healing biomarkers from in vivo label‐free multiphoton microscopy using convolutional neural networks. Lasers Surg Med, 2021; 53(8):1086–1095; doi: 10.1002/lsm.23375
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
